ServiceSource is a leader in an emerging field called Service Revenue Management, which for most technology companies refers to management of their ongoing subscription maintenance streams.  The company offers a technology platform and a suite of applications, as well as a managed services capability for some of their largest technology customers.  Some of their recognizable customers include Adobe, Cisco WebEx, NetApp and Xactly.  Montclair Advisors did a Smart SaaS Business Profile on ServiceSource in 2011 that provides background on the company, their strategy and product portfolio.

Last week I visited the ServiceSource offices in San Francisco to get a sneak peak of their new Avalon platform. Avalon is ServiceSource’s next generation SaaS platform that will pull together multiple capabilities including a beautiful new user experience, integration services with other leading Cloud platforms, a connected ecosystem of ServiceSource managed services and their continuous intelligence capability.

I was very impressed by their new user interface, its very clean and uses info-graphics metaphors along with in-line analytics to create a very easy-to-use, and understand product.  The graphics were elegant and provided a lot of drill down and mouse over information for the user.  Because ServiceSource is using HTML5, this interface is available on mobile devices as well as through a standard web browser.  The charts and graphs are all available inside of the product, which makes it easier to use than other CRM-like systems. The design point was to create a system that offers a walk-up interface, one that required little or no training for the users.  Here’s a screen shot of the new user interface.

Another unique aspect to the product is that there is a near real-time data warehouse that feeds the analytics for Avalon.  For example, when their customers are comparing their renewal rates against the industry or even their peer group, they will be looking at really fresh data.  It is common for most aggregated data of this type to be compiled and delivered in a quarterly or in some cases a monthly basis. So this continuous intelligence capability may deliver a competitive edge to ServiceSource customers because the information is representing how the company is operating right now. For most SaaS companies, it is difficult to gather service revenue-related data about their business on a continual basis but with this aspect of the ServiceSource Avalon product, it will make it really straightforward because it will be delivered through easy-to-use metrics and dashboards.

ServiceSource is using a very modern Cloud infrastructure for their Avalon platform.  The infrastructure is build on Node.js and Amazon Web Services, which is interesting because I haven’t seen a lot of enterprise software vendors building their next generation platform on the Amazon infrastructure.  There are clearly some scalability and elasticity advantages to using the AWS platform for a SaaS offering and ServiceSource is using many of these capabilities.  The company also has a strong Avalon development team with some ex-Coghead alumni leading the efforts.

With their new user interface and the flexibility they are building into their SaaS platform, it may be very easy for the company to allow their customers and prospects to ‘try before they buy’ new software modules and capabilities.  I believe that this inherent flexibility, for this type of application suite, should really increase user adoption and consumption levels, which should help ServiceSource continue to renew their customers and sell them additional products and managed services.

The Avalon service will be generally available later in 2012.

With Cornerstone OnDemand’s recent IPO (NASDAQ: CSOD) and their high valuation based on a negative EBIDTA, many are starting to ask if we are headed for a second Internet or SaaS Bubble?

I do agree that some of the valuations at this point are a lot higher than a reasonable person would expect, but this is probably just pent up interest in the technology sector. It doesn’t help that Facebook and LinkedIn has seriously pumped up the valuations for Internet/Social Media firms, but today’s SaaS companies are very different from the Dot Bombs of 1999/2000.

Remember these companies?

All of these companies were built on bad business models, too much money and expectations that were out of control. And by the way are all out of business.

But not all of the Internet companies that were formed during this period were bombs; in fact there are a number of firms that are now pillars of the technology industry including these firms:

It would be safe to say that each of these companies struggled during and after the Dot-Com collapse but they were able to modify their models to take advantage of the efficiencies that the Internet provided. Amazon has built a business that can effectively compete against the largest retailer in the world, Walmart, even though its sales are only 1/12^th their revenues.

All of these Internet Survivors had to develop a real business model that would deliver solid margins, profits and growth. They each had to assemble experienced management teams, learn how to deliver superior customer service and build trusted brands. Not easy to do, but they did it.

Fast-forward to today and we have a whole new set of Internet and Software-as-a-Service companies that have emerged and gone public including these firms:

(1) CSOD IPO: March 17, 2011

(2) SREV IPO: March 25, 2011

As you can see most of these companies were founded before the Internet Bubble burst and were forced to create real business models that could deliver profits.

At Montclair Advisors, we specialize in SaaS business advisory services and we know many of these firms quite well and they all have strong management teams, growing businesses and staying power. Unlike the Internet firms that went IPO in 1999 or 2000, most of these firms have had to build up their businesses over ten or more years and are based on some form of recurring revenues.

Major differences between the companies on this list versus the early Dot Bomb firms include:

• Proven Over Time. As you can see most of these firms are at least ten years old and have weathered the economic changes through the last two recessions.

• Businesses at Scale. Most of these companies are over $100M in annual revenues, which means they have been successful in selling into multiple markets and geographies.

• Recurring Revenue Streams. Anyone who has been involved with a company that has developed a subscription business can tell you how hard it is to create a meaningful recurring revenue stream. The advantages of being a SaaS software company based on subscriptions means that revenues remain consistent so there is a high degree of transparency and visibility.

• High Degree of Customer Satisfaction. All of these companies are dependent on satisfied customers that want to renew their annual subscription agreements and purchase more services. This is quite different than the ‘drive-by’ relationships many of the early Internet companies developed with their customers.

• Strong Management Teams. After the Dot Com crash it became much harder to file for an IPO and manage a company in the post Sarbanes-Oxley world. These next generation of Internet companies have attracted leading management expertise that knows how to innovate and rapidly scale viable businesses.

So are the valuations of companies like Cornerstone OnDemand and Servicesource, Facebook and LinkedIn too high? Are we beginning to see a SaaS Bubble? Maybe, but all of these companies have been built for the long term and will be around long after any correction, unlike their early Internet cousins Web Van or Kozmo.com.

By Kevin Dobbs

Montclair Advisors, LLC

Dreamforce 2010 was in San Francisco last week and there were a lot of announcements and it is only now that I am starting post my thoughts.   This post is going be around Force.com 2 and how Salesforce has rethought their approach, repackaged their platform and now have relaunced their PaaS.

This table provides a quick summary of how Salesforce has repackaged the Force.com 2 Platform.

What is interesting is that several of these offerings are just new packaging concepts and several are net-new products.  Let me walk you through the suite:

Appforce

This is basically the original Force platform using their proprietary 4GL, point-click-language APEX that has been repackaged as a departmental application platform.  What is interesting is that this environment is not just for departments, large enterprises like Japan Post and Thomson Reuters have done very large Cloud development projects using this platform.  I think that Salesforce realizes that due to its proprietary nature, most organizations will be attracted to Force.com but would prefer a more open and portable development environment.  Applications built with Appforce are also able to be easily integrated with Salesforce’s collaboration capability Chatter

.

Siteforce

This is a development environment specifically designed for building websites without having to write code. There was a great demonstration of how you can build and modify websites, even for mobile devices, using their drag-and-drop interface.  This will be popular with firms that do a lot of campaigns and need to design a lot of landing pages which can be tied back to Salesforce.  Like the Appforce products, Siteforce can be linked to Chatter to add social and mobile features to websites.  This was an existing capability inside of Force.com that has now been exposed as a new offering.  The marketing materials we were given state that there have been more than 20,000 website built using Siteforce.

VMforce

This platform is a result of a partnership with VMware, that opens up the Force.com platform to more than 6 million Java developers.  Using VMforce, developers can now run their Java-based applications on the Force.com platform, similar to what they would do it they were using Amazon EC2.  Developers can also use Java IDE’s like Spring or Eclipse as well as other open standards.  With my clients, this is a popular approach, it provides some leverage with existing Java-based apps as well as professional developers prefer to develop in this type of environment, rather than using a 4GL point-and-click product.   VMforce is currently in beta and will be ready for general availability in 2011.

Heroku

In a really interesting move, Salesforce went out an purchased a leading provider of Ruby-on-Rails for $212M in cash, $27M in stock and another $10M for un-vested employee shares.  Like VMforce, Heroku will offer developers a way to write applications using Ruby and then run them on Force.com.  The rumor was that VMware had made a run at the firm several months ago, but wanted to remain independent.  Marc Benioff in his keynote indicated that Heroku would remain independent from Salesforce, I am assuming in the way VMware has remained independent from EMC.  Several benifits for Heroku as part of Salesforce will be access to their 87,000 customers as well as their technology stack including Chatter.  Today, there are more than 100,000 websites and applications written using their platform including BestBuy and FlightCaster.

ISVforce

In another re-packaging move Salesforce has taken the Force.com platform and created a new program to help larger ISV’s to build their next generation applications on top of their PaaS.  This is a program that contains services and tools to help Independent Software Vendors to move their apps to the Cloud. Salesforce provides development services, trails and provisioning, connections to AppExchange and application monitoring along with their multi-tenant Infrastructure-as-a-Service.  Some early adopter ISV’s include Blackboard (who did a quick little demo), BMC (RemedyForce) and CA (Agile Vision).

AppExchange

Salesforce continues to promote their on-line application marketplace, which is similar to what Apple offers with their App Market, and how has over 1,000 applications available. Some interesting facts provided by Salesforce about the AppExchange include there have been more than 360,000 application test drives through the AppExchange, nearly 700,000 application installs and more than $1B invested in companies who are on the AppExchange.

Database.com

Another interesting announcement is that Salesforce has gone into the database business.  When I first heard this, I thought it wasn’t necessarily a good idea, but then I read that they were just repackaging a gigantic Cloud-based version of Oracle and selling the database by-the-slice.  Apparently Oracle thinks this is not a secure approach to selling databases, but let’s see how this all works out.  Amazon has something similar with their RDS offering.

The result is that Salesforce now has a suite of offerings that are designed to meet the needs to enterprise customers, software companies, professional and casual developers.  The strategic benefit of all of these offerings is to open up several new revenue streams for the company and continue their leadership momentum in the Cloud.

By Kevin Dobbs

The last few months have been quite active in the SaaS market and here are some things that caught my attention:

• Who would have believed that we would be seeing Initial Public Offerings after our recent recession but new offerings include SciQuest (NASDAQ: SQI), Qlik Technologies (NASDAQ: QLIK), Ancestory.com (NASDAQ: ACOM) and Financial Engines (NASDAQ: FNGN).  There are a number of upcoming IPO’s including Talent Management provider Cornerstone OnDemand.

• You can tell the SaaS and Software markets continue to gain momentum based on the number of M&A deals over the past 90 days including Oracle buying Art Technology Group, hardware company Dell purchased SaaS integration firm Boomi, Deltek buys government market research firm INPUT, talent management leader SuccessFactors buys analytics firm Youcalc, Taleo purchasing Learn.com for $125M, recruiting firm Kenexa acquired Salary.com and even PE-owned SumTotal Systems buying Softscape.

• Firms that are making good progress in their SaaS transitions include Callidus (NASDAQ: CALD) and Plateau Systems.

• Software companies who seem to be having more trouble with their current subscription and license models include Concur (NASDAQ: CNQR), MicroStrategy (NASDAQ: MSTR), Manhattan Associates (NASDAQ: MANH), and SAP (NYSE: SAP).

• The Venture community continues to fund SaaS and Cloud Computing firms, several who have been profiled by this blog have received funding in the last six months (congrats!) internet billing firm Zuora lands $20M, Cloud management platform RightScale grabbed $25M, multi-tenancy Cloud platform firm Nimbula raises $15M, marketing automation provider Marketo, Bill.com, social platform provider Jive Software raises $30M, Gooddata and Cloud9 Analytics.

• SaaS, Software and Cloud Computing firms have also made some interesting management changes over the past few months including; ex-Oracle president Charles Phillips (video) moved over to become the new CEO at Infor, Taleo lands a new CFO former Palm executive Douglas Jefferies, Saba has added a SaaS-experienced CMO Karen Steele, SuccessFactors brings in seasoned President from Salesforce.com - Doug Dennerline, PeopleclickAuthoria Chairman Charles Jones returns as CEO to run company and well-respected analyst Ray Wang joins Constellation Research.

Last week’s Oracle OpenWorld show was quite an event with many different story lines including the tie-in to the Iron Man 2 movie.  In fact, in the main area outside the keynote hall there were three Iron Man suites along side their Exadata and Exalogic cousins.  So here is what we learned:

Cloud in a Box according to Marc Benioff and Larry Ellison.  There was quite a number of heated, yet humorous references to Marc Benioff’s (CEO at Salesforce) comments related to Oracle’s view of Cloud Computing that it has to reside in an Exadata box.  In fact in one session I attended, he even said that the Internet was not made of Cloud boxes that were even taller than Marc, and he is tall.  In the Sunday afternoon session, Larry was very dismissive of both Marc’s vision of the Internet and his book Behind the Cloud. If you have some time check out Marc Benioff’s OpenWorld keynote, very funny.

What is really interesting is that in many ways they are both right.  Larry is very famous about a his rant on Cloud Computing and that it is nothing more than a network, servers and software.  This is true, even the most Cloudy providers in the market like Amazon and Salesforce.com are dependent on a real infrastructure that can scale and is reliable and many of these firms are Oracle customers.

On the other hand, Marc is right that the Cloud is less about buying, building and maintaining this scalable architecture and more about leveraging a firm that provides their Infrastructure-as-a-Service.  This has been one of the main catalysts for the software industry’s move to a subscription business model or SaaS, just like Salesforce.com.

In some ways both companies are right, it just depends on your viewpoint.   I think that Oracle is thinking more like IBM and HP and Salesforce is more aligned to Facebook and Zynga. Even though Larry and Marc were both exchanging jabs last week, they are both customers of each other, and in the end that is good for all of their customers.

Mark Hurd looks like he fits in well with Oracle.  The keynote sessions where Mark presented, he was relaxed and really knew the material.   Given Oracle’s absorption of Sun, it is really helpful to have someone with Mark Hurd’s background helping Larry run the company.  The hardware business is quite different than running a software firm and Oracle was able to secure one of the best hardware executives in the industry from HP.

Oracle is really embracing the hardware world.  It was interesting to see the focus on the new Exadata and Exalogic products.  The company’s messaging revolved around performance, availability, security and management and not very much around applications or Cloud Computing.  A lot of discussion around hardware and software being engineered together to create these incredibly powerful database and middleware server platforms.  But does this approach raise concerns around ‘vendor lock-in‘?   This hardware-centric strategy makes sense because Oracle really views IBM as their biggest competitor and they need to monetize the Sun acquisition as well.

Fusion applications are coming at the end of the year, but not sure if anyone at Oracle cares. Larry told the crowd that the writing of the new Oracle Fusion applications for Financial Management, Procurement and Sourcing, Project and Portfolio Management, Human Capital Management, Customer Relationship Management, Supply Chain Management, and Governance Risk and Compliance.  These are the products that were promised last year at OpenWorld but they appear to be real at this point.  Although I didn’t attend the deep dive sessions for Fusion, others who did told me that they have done a good job.  At the Wednesday afternoon keynote, the demos of the products looked good and the user interface looks quite modern.

According to Larry the writing of the new Fusion applications was the biggest development project in Oracle’s history, it was interesting to see that there was little for no fanfare surrounding this major milestone.  As long as the Fusion applications sell more database and infrastructure software and more Exadata servers, I guess that’s what is important.   The successful roll out of the Fusion applications later in the year is going to be important for the overall software market but I doubt it will really impact the leading SaaS providers like Salesforce.com, Taleo, SuccessFactors or Workday.  It will be interesting to see how Oracle evolves its thinking about the applications market and it’s approach to the Cloud, because that is where all the growth will come over the next 5 years.

The broader SaaS market (I would include PaaS and Cloud Computing) have been really interesting this year and here are some of the notable news items that have caught my attention over the past couple of months:

Mergers & Acqusitions

SuccessFactors buys CubeTree for $50M… Interesting move into the collaboration space

IBM buys CastIron … Nice compliment to their Cloud Infrastructure offerings.  Is Boomi next?

… then IBM buys CoreMetrics.

Salesforce.com buys JigSaw for $142M! … Surprised that they would pay up for a content company.

CA buys Nimsoft for $350M … gets into the SaaS infrastructure management market.  Good company.

SAP buys Sybase for $5.8B …  not sure about this one?  A diversion to deflect attention away from BBD?

RedPrairie buys SmartTurn … traditional SCM provider begins their move to SaaS.

VMWare looking at EngineYard … interesting since Amazon funded this Ruby-on-Rails PaaS startup.

Fundings & IPO’s

Marketing Automation: Marketo raises $10M Series D, led by Mayfield.

Enterprise Collaboration: Yammer raises $10M Series B, led by Emergence Capital.

Financial Analytics:  Host Analytics raises $15M Series C, led by Next World Capital.

Cloud Business Intelligence:  Cloud9 Analytics raises $8M Series C, led by Mayfield.

Recent SaaS/Cloud IPO’s include Convio, SPS Commerce and Financial Engines.

New Products and Launches

Broadvision launches Clearvale … Ning for the enterprise.

Plateau launches PaaS platform for Talent Management

Mercer partners with PeopleClick Authoria, first combination of HR consulting content with Talent Management technology platform

VMware and Force.com partner, launch VMForce.

Lawson launches ERP Cloud offering on Amazon AWS … too little, too late?

Recently Profiled SaaS Companies by Montclair Advisors

Birst, CentralDesktop, Cloud9 Analytics, GoodData, Marketo, Netsuite and WOLF Frameworks.

There are definitely a lot going on in the SaaS and Cloud Computing markets and we will continue to cover newsworthy events and profile leading players throughout 2010.