At Montclair Advisors I work with many different types and sizes of software firms that are jumping into the SaaS business model for the first time.   Here are a few tips that I would tell a new client who is looking to get into the SaaS business in 2012.

Think “Whole Product”

A SaaS offering is more than just software, it is also the services to get the product up and running, training, support, the infrastructure and security.

For most SaaS firms, they really view their platform as synonymous with their company’s overall brand, which includes more than just the technology. This brand promise is a product experience that is smooth and consistent. It also takes into account issues like business continuity and being able to quickly restore systems and data after an outage. This also means that SaaS offerings must understand and how to properly manage security and compliance concerns for large, complex customers.  In some cases this promise needs to do a high level of monitoring and even anticipate and correct problems before they occur.

When considering the professional service component of a SaaS offering, there should be extra focus on efficient provisioning and on-boarding of new customers. It is important to make this initial experience quick and easy in order to improve the customer’s overall time-to-value. By combining many customer-facing functions like support, training and service into a Customer Success team is also another popular way of trying to deliver a positive ‘whole’ product experience.

Focus on Adoption and Consumption

The economics of SaaS requires both a high rate of new customer sales combined with a better than 90% renewal rate for the financial model to work. The trick that the really fast growing SaaS firms have discovered is that up-selling additional capacity and cross-selling new products not only increases top line revenues but also improves overall Customer Acquisition Costs (CAC) and business margins.

The objective in any software company should always be to build a satisfied customer-base, but in the SaaS model you can’t stop there, it is important get customers to actively use and adoption the product. When a product is easy-to-use, intuitive, being used every day, and built on a solid platform, then it can become viral. Viral products like DropBox, Yammer and Salesforce.com’s Chatter can throw off high marginal add-on sales, that can boost a SaaS company’s revenues very quickly. This type of product consumption is important for all SaaS company’s even if the use of their product may never go viral.

It’s All About Growth

Many new SaaS firms spend a lot of time and capital building out their products, which makes sense. Often they underestimate the amount of effort and focus required to build a high growth sales and marketing machine. Because it is hard initially to jump start the recurring revenue model, it is important to develop a highly productive sales methodology, usually based on a ‘land and expand’ approach. For the most successful SaaS companies (SuccessFactors, Salesforce.com, Workday), an aggressive Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) is imperative to building a profitable company.  Many of these firms, even though they are large, are still growing at 30-50% per year.

In order to build this sales and marketing engine, it requires a meaningful investment in lead generation, a sales organization that separates hunters from farmers and has a set of metrics that are tracked at least weekly. For ISV’s that are moving to a SaaS model, don’t co-mingle the SaaS and non-SaaS sales teams. Each sales team should be very focused on selling a single type of product or a single function. For example, having a SaaS team that focuses on selling only new SaaS deals, another is only doing renewals or up-selling.

Because products and markets are different, it is important to constantly be testing lead generation, pricing, packaging and sales processes in order to find the best one that works for your business. If something doesn’t work, stop doing it, and pivot to another idea. The best SaaS companies are always testing and trying to improve their revenue generation processes.

Optimize Cost of Goods Sold

Most SaaS executives are focused on their COGS and how best to optimize them. This is why many early SaaS firms use free open source software and Infrastructure-as-a-Service providers to build out their platforms, or outsource components of their business to partners to save money. The best way to optimize COGS is to reduce the number of people required to on-board, provision and operate your SaaS platform. It is better to automate as many of your processes as possible, which not only saves precious capital, but also can often improve the overall scalability of the business.

One the best examples of this type of automation is with the popular commercial SaaS storage solution DropBox [Check out this video]. They have built a service that is easy to use, self-provisioning and needs no human intervention. This is why they were able to on-board 40 million new customers during the last 12 months with a net increase of only 7 people across their entire company! This is where SaaS companies can become very profitable and grow very quickly.

Another area that can really impact COGS is related to the 30-day trials associated with most SaaS software. Without a scalable platform that has a sufficient level of automation, the launching, management, tear down and re-provisioning of resources will all be done by an ever growing team of professional services or IT professionals. Best practice is to leverage a multi-tenant platform and automate everything possible.

Strive for Independence

For ISV’s who are either transitioning to or launching a new SaaS offering, it is important to seriously consider keeping the new SaaS organization separate from the main business. I have seen many ‘shared service’ models where different groups share sales, operations, demand generation, services and even support and they experience a lot of challenges. The SaaS business model in many ways is unique and conflicts with most traditional software business practices.

For example, professional services in most software companies is a revenue-center and they are always looking for ways to generate additional projects and revenue. At a SaaS company, the professional services team is doing the opposite.  A SaaS services team is trying to minimize their level of involvement with the customer, and the less services involved in setting up a SaaS product, the better. This would be a difficult group to manage if you have both a revenue quota and are also trying to minimize revenue associated with SaaS accounts.

The other reason I often recommend creating an independent group for transitioning ISV’s is that the overall rate and pace of SaaS companies is quite different than traditional software firms. SaaS firms develop products more quickly, sales processes are faster, deployments are more rapid and this mismatch in speed creates a lot of stress when traditional ISVs try to adopt this rate and pace.

It is also important to continue the care and feeding of the core business and realize that is also a critical success factor. By allowing this type of co-existence you can move at the right rate and pace, while continuing to build and run your core business.

There are many other tips and tricks to starting your SaaS business.  Feel free to email me at kevin@montclairadvisors.com and I have some other materials that can be helpful for those who are new to the SaaS model.

As it turned out I was right about 50% of my predictions last year, so here’s my educated guesses for what is going to happen to the SaaS market in 2012:

#10  Oracle will buy Netsuite.

I know this isn’t much of a surprise since Larry Ellison owns approximately 65% of Netsuite, but with the RightNow acquisition, this type of move makes more sense as part of coordinated Cloud acquisition strategy.

#9  SaaS IPO window remains open.

There are a number of SaaS firms who have either filed, like Eloqua, or are seriously considering going public in 2012, like Workday, Dropbox, Box, and Guidewire.  This window can be opened even wider by successful IPO’s from companies like Yelp and Facebook.  The only problem is that there are over 100 companies who have already filed to go public in 2012, so it might be difficult for smaller SaaS firms to do their IPO.

#8. Master brands will continue to chase SaaS offerings.

IBM just purchased DemandTec and SAP bought SuccessFactors, while Oracle bought RightNow.  This is a big change from 2010 when most of these companies were not interested in the Cloud or SaaS.  All of these master brands have tried to build their own SaaS businesses, but I think they have now finally realized that SaaS is a business model, not just new technology.  The smart firms will keep their SaaS businesses and their core license businesses separate and not try and merge them.  Good luck.

#7. Workday will have a monster IPO.

There is no doubt that the 2012 IPO of Facebook will set all sorts of records but for enterprise software, I think Workday will be one of the biggest on record.  The company just took in $85 million in funding over the past few months, in what was termed an IPO preview round. Workday could raise as much as $500 million in an IPO, which would force the big ERP players to start building out their SaaS businesses as a defensive strategy at the bare minimum.

#6. SaaS starts to go global.

I was involved in an Oracle SaaS webinar a couple of weeks ago for an audience in Europe and the response was really impressive.  I initially thought that most of the registrants would be from the UK, the Netherlands, Germany and Scandinavia.  Actually there were attendees from almost every country in Europe.  I have also started to hear about strong SaaS interest in Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, Japan, China and many other countries.  2012 will just continue to build on the SaaS market’s growing global momentum.

#5. Salesforce continues to expand beyond CRM.

During 2011 Salesforce purchased several firms that added new capabilities to their platform including DimDim (collaboration), Radian6 (social analytics), Model Metrics (mobility) and then they bought Rypple in December, which launched them into the Human Capital market.  I predict that Salesforce will add several other HCM tuck-in acquisitions (JobScience, Jobvite), financial applications (FinancialForce, Zuora), or even supply chain management (Glovia OM, Kenandy).

#4. IT Management and Security SaaS offerings emerge.

Companies like CA have been successful in launching their new Nimsoft ITM SaaS offering during 2011, but there are also many other firms that are beginning to gain momentum with their new SaaS offerings as well. This is a very big market opportunity to replace existing legacy infrastructure and security offerings. Companies to watch include Service-Now, Trustwave, Splunk, PingIdentity and Proofpoint.

(Note: CA/Nimsoft and PingIdentity are Montclair Advisors clients)

#3. SaaS continues to be social.

With Jive going public during December 2011, they are just the most recent example of SaaS social applications gaining market acceptance.  Salesforce has been very successful with their Chatter and Radian6 offerings.  Independents like Yammer, SocialCast, Lithium and CentralDesktop will continue to see increased demand for their social/collaboration platforms.

#2. More big VC rounds for SaaS firms.

2012 will continue to see VC’s put a lot of money to work with leading SaaS companies.  We saw some major investments during 2011 including Box ($81 million), Dropbox ($250 million), HubSpot ($32 million), Marketo ($50 million), Workday ($85 million) and Zuora ($35 million).  This trend will continue in 2012 and companies will be putting a lot of money to work to build out their platforms and distribution capabilities.

#1. Storage is a major story for 2012.

As more and more data is stored in the Cloud, consumers and businesses are looking to all different types of on-line storage services.  During the year that Apple launched its iCloud small business and music storage service, we also saw major funding rounds for SaaS companies including Dropbox and Box.  We even saw a new IPO from Carbonite that provides a small business/consumer Cloud back-up service.  This is definitely a segment of the SaaS market to keep an eye on in 2012.

For the SaaS world, Oracle’s OpenWorld has lately been all about hardware and the Exastack products. These offerings have limited appeal to all but the largest SaaS ISV’s.   The good news is that there were some new announcements though that were much more interesting for the SaaS community at last week’s Oracle OpenWorld in San Francisco.  Here is a quick summary of the news and drama:

Oracle Public Cloud

This was a welcome move by Oracle, to finally embrace their vision of the Cloud. Oracle is re-packaging many of their assets including the Exastack, Java, and the Oracle Database into a pay-as-you-go service, which should be appealing to smaller customers as well as ISV’s looking for an easier way to leverage Oracle technology.

The key theme that Larry Ellison [video] kept emphasizing was that the Oracle Public Cloud is standards-based and will allow a customer to port products they built on their Cloud to other standards-based Clouds or even on-premise. Larry was quite funny in his keynote by referring to his competitor’s Clouds as the “Roach Motel of Clouds”, because once you go in, you never come out.

In addition to just pure infrastructure services, Oracle will also make available its applications including Fusion CRM and Fusion HCM products as their collaboration platform.

Here are some other interesting articles on the Oracle Public Cloud:

• Ellison Reveals Oracle’s Public Cloud; Calls Salesforce The ‘Roach Motel’ Of Cloud Services, Rip Empson, TechCrunch.
• How Oracle’s Public Cloud Is Different, Charles Babcock, InformationWeek.
• Oracle Public Cloud might be extensive, but it’s boring, Larry Dignan, ZDNet.

Oracle Social Network

Sounds a little like that movie about Facebook. The Oracle social strategy is to provide an easy-to-use interface for both their new Fusion applications as well as the Oracle Public Cloud.

Their social network looks remarkably similar to the Chatter offering from Salesforce.com. The Oracle Social Network allows you to track projects by activity streams, follow people and objects as well as standard collaboration inside the enterprise.  There is no social analytics capability similar to the Radian6 offering that Salesforce offers, but I think this is just version 1 of the Oracle Social Network.

This new collaboration tool will also be available on-premise as well as in the Cloud. The Oracle Social Network also provides an iPad front-end that should be appealing for mobile workforces

Fusion Application Suite – Now Ready

Last year there was a quiet announcement of the general availability of the Oracle Fusion applications. This year was much different with Larry Ellison announcing the full suite of Oracle Fusion apps and he even did a demo of their new Fusion CRM system (BTW he did a great demo).

Oracle spent six years to completely re-write all of the PeopleSoft, Siebel, Hyperion suites of applications and now there is a new generation of Fusion applications including;

• Fusion CRM
• Fusion Financials
• Fusion Governance, Risk and Compliance
• Fusion Human Capital Management
• Fusion Procurement
• Fusion Project Portfolio Management
• Fusion Supply Chain Management
• [Photos] Fusion Apps

The interfaces look modern and don’t appear to be warmed over client/server applications. Coupled with the Oracle Social Network, these products should be quite competitive in the SaaS market. All of the Fusion applications are available either on-premise, as a managed service and as a SaaS service through the Oracle Public Cloud. There weren’t a lot of details about this hybrid architecture and like the Oracle Public Cloud and Social Network, there will probably be more details early in 2012.

Salesforce – Occupy OpenWorld

As always, there is some great theater at OpenWorld when Oracle rescheduled Marc Benioff’s keynote to Thursday morning (the day the conference ended) and he went rogue. Salesforce quickly shifted the keynote to the hotel down the street. Montclair Advisors was right at the press conference but as it turned out it was basically the same Social Enterprise keynote that was delivered at Dreamforce.

A lot of kudos goes out to the Salesforce marketing team for being able to pull off such a solid event, including streaming the keynote speech over the Internet, in less than 24 hours. Talk about business agility!

Here are some pictures from the event and a few articles with more controversy:

• [Video] Marc Benioff’s rogue Oracle OpenWorld keynote.
• [Pictures] Montclair Advisors was at the rogue Salesforce press event, got some good shots.
• A Keynote Cancelled, A Database Dropped, Lauren Carlson, Software Advice.
• Benioff, Denied OpenWorld Keynote, Mounts Podium Anyway, Charles Babock, InformationWeek.
• Oracle OpenWorld snub fails to put off Salesforce CEO, Brid-Aine Parnell The Register.

Workday 13 Update

Workday provided a preview of the latest product update, Workday 13 at the end of April.  This appeared to be a major release of functionality across their entire ERP suite including Workday HCM, Workday Payroll, Workday Initiatives (Work Management), Workday Financial Management, Workday Spend Management as well as some new user experience capabilities.

This was the first update we have received in about two years so it was really impressive to see how much progress the company has made not only with their products but also with their overall business.  Here are some key facts:

• 200 customers and more than 130 of them are live
• Flextronics have over 100,000 employees using their systems
• Over 1,000,0000 employees are using their various products across their customer base
• Targeting an IPO for the second half of 2012
• Releasing about 3 updates per year, compared to 1 every 18+ months for their ERP competitors

Workday HCM

As I mentioned, the last time I saw a Workday product demonstration, they didn’t very much in the way of talent management functionality but that has really changed. They now have compensation planning, performance management, succession planning and competency management.  They have wrapped these capabilities in a robust in-line analytics and decision support framework.  This framework includes pre-packaged reports and some really slick user interfaces for workforce management.  This screen shot is of their 9-box interface for their succession planning product.  What I thought was really cool is how they have integrated their position management and organization charting capabilities right into this 9-box interface for their Talent Matrix.  These capabilities look very competitive to most of the other leading SaaS TMS players in the market.

For capabilities that they don’t currently have in the their talent management products like recruitment they will continue to partner with leading specialists like StepStone (now Lumesse) who acquired MrTed and Taleo.

For learning management they have built an intelligent interface into Plateau (recently acquired by SuccessFactors).

When they demonstrated the Workday 13 product, the one thing that popped out at me was the user experience and how engaging it was.  The user interface appeared to quite flexible, allowing the user to drill down, or across to access important information, as well as the use of compelling charts, graphs and dashboards.  I thought it was interesting to see how an object oriented architecture can really impact the overall usability of your SaaS products.

Workday Payroll

For an ERP system it is very useful to provide a payroll solution to tie into.  Workday’s product has been built from the ground up to be a SaaS-based payroll solution.  Workday Payroll was launched in 2009 and supports US based payroll requirements.  The news for Workday Payroll is a new partnership with OneSource VHR for payroll co-sourcing services such as payroll settlement, tax and garnishment administration.  These are common requirements for organizations with very large workforces.

Workday 13 still offers integrations into third-party payroll providers and payroll aggregators such as Patersons and ADP.

Workday Mobility

Seems like every HR software company is now offering a mobile application for users.  The news in this area was the announcement of limited availability of Workday for the iPad.  Again, one of Workday’s strengths is user interface design and this product is no exception.  The product is not intended for heavy transactional use but more for the executive or manager that wants to easily browse through talent profiles, monitor their Chatter-like personal Workday Workfeed or gain insight into their workforce by running a report or analytics.   The general availability for Workday for iPad is planned for Workday 14.

Overall, I thought that the Workday 13 release contained some useful improvements and the product is really impressive.  Given their 3 times a year release cycle, they will continue to innovate at a brisk pace which will be difficult for the traditional ERP competitors to keep up with.  Also, their laser focus on usability will also become a huge differentiator when looking at incumbent solutions, as long as Workday can deliver the necessary functionality and security that enterprises are going to continue to demand.

I was going to write this post earlier in the week but it seemed that everywhere I turned I saw more developments and wanted to include them.  The market is really starting to get frothy and there are many big SaaS/Cloud deals happening and companies going public with very large market caps.  Let’s take a look:

Recent Acquisitions

SuccessFactors (NASDAQ: SFSF) Acquires Plateau Systems for $290M, which was paid in half cash and half in stock.  This is an interesting move since it is the first acquisition that could be considered ‘core’ functionality when compared with other acquisitions like CubeTree (Collaboration), YouCalc (Analytics), Inform (Analytics) and Jambok (eLearning).  Plateau also has a fairly significant product portfolio overlap including compensation, performance management and succession planning, so it should be interesting to see how these offerings are consolidated.

Plateau has a very respectable customer-base with a large number of federal government customers as well as many large enterprise customers.  The company also was profitable and has some interesting Platform-as-a-Service capabilities that should be very useful for a larger SaaS portfolio.

Based on the market basket of publicly traded SaaS firms, this deal will make SuccessFactors the second largest firm in the group based on current revenues.  We estimate that at their current quarterly run-rate of $68M and Plateau’s estimated annual revenues, the combined company now is probably around $340M, which is only second to Salesforce.com.

CenturyLink (NASDAQ: CTL) Buys Savvis (NASDAQ: SVVS) for $2.5B, which is now third largest telecommunications company in the US with $18B in annual revenues.  The company had purchased Qwest earlier in the year and that deal was finalized on April 1st.   Now with the acquisition of Savvis, CenturyLink is moving into the Cloud Computing market with more than 48 data centers globally.

This is the second major deal in the Cloud Computing market of an emerging Infrastructure-as-a-Service provider, when Verizon purchased Terremark for $1.4B in January.  This should stimulate further consolidation of other providers and Rackspace may be the next target.

Salesforce.com (NASDAQ: CRM) Picks Up Radian6 for $326M for the Canadian social media monitoring company.  Radian6 helps their customers monitor ‘hundreds of millions’ of social media conversations. Salesforce believes that the acquisition will enable it to enhance all of its products, including Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, Chatter and Force.com.

Infor and Golden Gate Capital Buys Lawson Software for $2B.  Now this is technically not a SaaS or Cloud related deal but it just is another example of the pressure traditional providers are feeling from the up and coming SaaS and Cloud providers like Netsuite, Workday and even Oracle’s new Fusion offerings.

Recent SaaS IPO’s

Cornerstone OnDemand (NADSAQ: CSOD) went public on March 16th and quickly captured a market cap of $800M, even when the company lost more than $45M.  The company offers a suite of Talent Management solutions similar to what is offered by SuccessFactors and Taleo.

ServiceSource International (NASDAQ: SREV) completed their IPO on March 25th and were valued at more than $800M as well.  ServiceSource helps companies manage their revenue streams from renewals, maintenance and subscription agreements, which is especially important for SaaS firms.

Responsys (NASDAQ: MKTG) was able to launch into the public markets on April 21st and got a very respectable market value of $2.4B.  The company offers SaaS-based software and services that help retailers and eCommerce firms build and manage online campaigns.

By Kevin Dobbs

Montclair Advisors, LLC

Dreamforce 2010 was in San Francisco last week and there were a lot of announcements and it is only now that I am starting post my thoughts.   This post is going be around Force.com 2 and how Salesforce has rethought their approach, repackaged their platform and now have relaunced their PaaS.

This table provides a quick summary of how Salesforce has repackaged the Force.com 2 Platform.

What is interesting is that several of these offerings are just new packaging concepts and several are net-new products.  Let me walk you through the suite:

Appforce

This is basically the original Force platform using their proprietary 4GL, point-click-language APEX that has been repackaged as a departmental application platform.  What is interesting is that this environment is not just for departments, large enterprises like Japan Post and Thomson Reuters have done very large Cloud development projects using this platform.  I think that Salesforce realizes that due to its proprietary nature, most organizations will be attracted to Force.com but would prefer a more open and portable development environment.  Applications built with Appforce are also able to be easily integrated with Salesforce’s collaboration capability Chatter

.

Siteforce

This is a development environment specifically designed for building websites without having to write code. There was a great demonstration of how you can build and modify websites, even for mobile devices, using their drag-and-drop interface.  This will be popular with firms that do a lot of campaigns and need to design a lot of landing pages which can be tied back to Salesforce.  Like the Appforce products, Siteforce can be linked to Chatter to add social and mobile features to websites.  This was an existing capability inside of Force.com that has now been exposed as a new offering.  The marketing materials we were given state that there have been more than 20,000 website built using Siteforce.

VMforce

This platform is a result of a partnership with VMware, that opens up the Force.com platform to more than 6 million Java developers.  Using VMforce, developers can now run their Java-based applications on the Force.com platform, similar to what they would do it they were using Amazon EC2.  Developers can also use Java IDE’s like Spring or Eclipse as well as other open standards.  With my clients, this is a popular approach, it provides some leverage with existing Java-based apps as well as professional developers prefer to develop in this type of environment, rather than using a 4GL point-and-click product.   VMforce is currently in beta and will be ready for general availability in 2011.

Heroku

In a really interesting move, Salesforce went out an purchased a leading provider of Ruby-on-Rails for $212M in cash, $27M in stock and another $10M for un-vested employee shares.  Like VMforce, Heroku will offer developers a way to write applications using Ruby and then run them on Force.com.  The rumor was that VMware had made a run at the firm several months ago, but wanted to remain independent.  Marc Benioff in his keynote indicated that Heroku would remain independent from Salesforce, I am assuming in the way VMware has remained independent from EMC.  Several benifits for Heroku as part of Salesforce will be access to their 87,000 customers as well as their technology stack including Chatter.  Today, there are more than 100,000 websites and applications written using their platform including BestBuy and FlightCaster.

ISVforce

In another re-packaging move Salesforce has taken the Force.com platform and created a new program to help larger ISV’s to build their next generation applications on top of their PaaS.  This is a program that contains services and tools to help Independent Software Vendors to move their apps to the Cloud. Salesforce provides development services, trails and provisioning, connections to AppExchange and application monitoring along with their multi-tenant Infrastructure-as-a-Service.  Some early adopter ISV’s include Blackboard (who did a quick little demo), BMC (RemedyForce) and CA (Agile Vision).

AppExchange

Salesforce continues to promote their on-line application marketplace, which is similar to what Apple offers with their App Market, and how has over 1,000 applications available. Some interesting facts provided by Salesforce about the AppExchange include there have been more than 360,000 application test drives through the AppExchange, nearly 700,000 application installs and more than $1B invested in companies who are on the AppExchange.

Database.com

Another interesting announcement is that Salesforce has gone into the database business.  When I first heard this, I thought it wasn’t necessarily a good idea, but then I read that they were just repackaging a gigantic Cloud-based version of Oracle and selling the database by-the-slice.  Apparently Oracle thinks this is not a secure approach to selling databases, but let’s see how this all works out.  Amazon has something similar with their RDS offering.

The result is that Salesforce now has a suite of offerings that are designed to meet the needs to enterprise customers, software companies, professional and casual developers.  The strategic benefit of all of these offerings is to open up several new revenue streams for the company and continue their leadership momentum in the Cloud.

Company:            Yammer

Started:                2007

Located:               San Francisco, California

Geography:          North America

Market:                Enterprise Microblogging Platform

Products:            Yammer Desktop, Yammer on your Mobile Device, and Yammer Plug-Ins

Key Customers:  Deloitte, AMD, AAA of Northern California, Nevada and Utah, SMG, Cargill, Thomson Reuters, Sungard, Hill & Knowlton and SunCorp.

Website:               Yammer

Blog:                    Yammer Blog

Twitter:                @Yammer

Recent News:

Yammer is Selected as an MIT Sloan CIO Symposium Innovation Showcase Finalist

Fortune 500 Companies Flock to Yammer

Yammer Secures $10 Million in Series B Funding from Emergence Capital and Previous Investors

I asked David Sacks, Yammer’s Founder, CEO and Chairman of the Board few questions about his business and his view of the SaaS market in 2010.

Did you start out as a Software-as-a-Service company?

Yes, we did start out as a SaaS company. Our company was incubated inside of Geni, which develops family tree software. I was also involved with the consumer Internet with my experience starting PayPal. As both companies scaled, I found it was hard to keep tabs on what everyone was doing, and Yammer was developed to address this challenge. We found that microblogging was a great way to keep current on the status of important projects, individual profiles and information feeds inside of an enterprise.

Then in 2008, we spun out Yammer and that same year won the TechCrunch 50’s Best in Show award.

Initially we were targeting small and medium sized businesses but we are now seeing that Yammer has strong appeal for large enterprises like AAA, AMD, Cargill, Cisco, Deloitte, and Thomson Reuters.

Yammer is very viral because it was very easy for anyone to sign-up, confirm their company’s email address and start using the system. You don’t need to wait for an IT administrator to set up Yammer and you can quickly invite your work colleagues, with the same company email domain, to join in and begin collaborating with you.

When a company wants to claim the network being used by it’s employees, they pay a nominal subscription fee, and then we provide a set of administrative tools that allow them to manage upgrades, security, compliance, deliver premium support, and customize their site.

Part of our initial business model was to base Yammer on the consumer model of software, but make it enterprise-class. We wanted to remove the traditional friction from our software sales process by making our product as easy to use as Facebook.

Why do your customers buy from Yammer?

Our customers never have to pay or upgrade our software unless their employees are using it. This is very attractive, when you compare it to the traditional software selection process where you have to vet vendors, choose one, negotiate the contract, implement the product, pay a lot of money and then no one uses it. Yammer is de-risking the traditional enterprise software value proposition. Employees are valuing it because they use it.

When large companies see thousands of employees using Yammer what do they do? They can do three things - wait and see what happens, shut it down or buy it and we are finding the vast majority of companies are buying Yammer because their employees are being productive and want to collaborate using the software.Our customers also really like our administrative tools for e-discovery, security, directory integration, and network administration.

“If Facebook and Twitter had a baby, it would be Yammer.”

We are like Twitter because we offer a real-time feed of information; you can follow any one, join groups and sort information feeds by hash tags. We are like Facebook because there is no 140-character limit, you can have attachments, threaded replies and we offer a variety of enterprise management tools.

Yammer is a like a virtual office where workers can feel more connected to each other, especially remote workers. We act like the traditional company water cooler for these distributed organizations. As workforces become more mobile, Yammer just make a lot of sense for enterprise collaboration. Today we only offer Yammer in English but we have noticed that there are an increasing number of new customers who are signing up outside of North America. In the near future we will be supporting multiple languages in addition to English.

Customers also like our value-based pricing model. We charge between $3 and $5 per seat per month, depending on the level of support and administrative tools. We also provide volume discounts for our larger customers. This is much more cost attractive than purchasing Chatter from Salesforce.com for $15 per seat, which is quite expensive and most employees don’t want to communicate through the company’s corporate CRM system. Our very fast viral Freemium approach appears to be working, because since we have been live for only the last 18 months we now have over 1 million seats today.

What do you see as the key trend emerging in the SaaS industry?

The first trend is the consumerization of enterprise software; Yammer is a great example of this trend. Real innovation in the technology space over the past 10 years has been on the consumer-side of the software market with products like Facebook and Twitter. At Yammer we want to take these learnings back into the enterprise software world. When I was at PayPal, we were very successful using the Freemium model to promote adoption. This type of approach to software can definitely result in the overall democratization of enterprise software. SaaS is the first step, when the delivery model changed, then there were no upfront costs and the risk is dramatically lower. Using techniques developed by consumer software firms, more and different kinds of buyers can now access enterprise-class software.

The second trend we see is that enterprise software products will be designed more for the end-user than power users or administrators. A good example is how Facebook and Twitter don’t do every possible feature or function and they don’t clutter the user’s screen. This simplified approach to software allow causal users to be more engaged with their products and other users. These types of causal use software products will also appeal to younger employees who have used Facebook and LinkedIn and expect their enterprise software products to be that easy to use.

Social Networking is also a major trend we are seeing. We started thinking about this over the last couple of years, since 2007. Now it seems so obvious, that social networking would grow into an unstoppable trend. The ability to connect workers, to leverage expertise and content all in real-time, which allows everyone to work smarter, just makes a lot of sense. I still think that there is confusion about Enterprise Social Networking, for instance Salesforce sees it as a CRM newsfeed, and we see it as enterprise real-time communication. Eventually we see Enterprise Social Networking replacing corporate email and instant messaging.

What is your outlook for 2010?

In January we raised $10M, led by Emergence, that  provided capital to allow us to expand our team. Our investors liked the fact that we have built a very cost effective business, based on our viral distribution model. Our Q1 sales were greater than all of our sales for last year combined.

The software industry is realizing that Enterprise Collaboration is going to be a huge space. Most software companies will want to get into this market because every company will want one of these collaboration platforms to deploy. The only problem is that most enterprise software firms looks at these types of tools backwards, because they already have multiple different product lines, then they will need to stuff it through their sales channel. At Yammer we have already solved this distribution channel problem and we can actually open up our channel to these companies as a Distribution as a Service model.

We continue to sign up a number of large customers, and this type of adoption makes other large companies comfortable using our technology. Things look great and our traction is accelerating.

After our post on January 26th we got several great comments about the cost of starting a SaaS company.  It definitely takes a commitment to build a true SaaS company, especially when you consider some the following facts about the 15 public companies that I tracked in my high level analysis:

• Average Start-up Capital Required:                                   $44M
• Average Time Required from Start-up till IPO:                 7 years
• Average Capital Required per Year till IPO (Burn):             $6.8M
• Average IPO Proceeds:                                                    $76M
• Additional Capital Raised After the IPO:                           $243M
• Average Total Capital Raised:                                          $363M
• Average Market Capitalization:                                      $1,262M
• Companies Who are Profitable:                                            8

The costs of getting a SaaS start-up off the ground are substantial but only about half of the firms we tracked actually started out as a pure SaaS company.   These other Cross-Over firms started out as either Application Service Providers (ASP’s) or were traditional On-premise ISV’s that move to SaaS through a combination of organic migration or through a series of acquisitions.  Companies like Concur, Kenexa, Taleo and Ultimate Software have all transitioned to SaaS from an on-premise heritage.

Montclair Advisors - SaaS Start Up Costs - Pre IPO

The shortest time to go from start-up phase to an IPO was 4 years and the longest was 13 years.  Most of the firms we tracked were founded between 1997 to 1999, which was prior and during the Internet Bubble.

When these firms went public they raised a range between $30M (LivePerson and Ultimate Software) to over $150M (DealerTrack and NetSuite), but on average they raised about $75M.  All the firms then went on to do additional capital raises from $32M (LivePerson) up to $750M (DealerTrack) but on average each raised $243M!   The total capital raised, when considering both pre IPO, IPO and post IPO capital raised, these firms raised between $100M (LivePerson and Ultimate Software) to close to more than $500M (DealerTrack, Salesforce.com and SuccessFactors).

Montclair Advisors - SaaS Start Up Costs - Post IPO

After going public, this SaaS market basket of companies have done well as a group.  The majority of the firms are profitable, which makes for solid cash flow performance, revenue visibility and overall stability of the company’s stock, for the real SaaS firms.

The most valuable company, based on their Market Cap is Salesforce.com at more than $8B and there are at least 4 other SaaS firms with valuations over $1B (Blackboard, Concur, NetSuite and SuccessFactors).  When comparing the amount of capital raised to the market valuation, the 5 best performing firms are Salesforce.com (.09), Ultimate Software (.13) , Concur (.19), RightNow (.22) and LivePerson (.31).

Montclair Advisors - SaaS Start Up Costs - Market Caps

This year, as the economy improves, promises to launch a few new SaaS IPOs and we will continue to track this core group as well as a larger group of Hybrids and Cross Overs and will periodically report back with our findings.