After our post on January 26th we got several great comments about the cost of starting a SaaS company.  It definitely takes a commitment to build a true SaaS company, especially when you consider some the following facts about the 15 public companies that I tracked in my high level analysis:

• Average Start-up Capital Required:                                   $44M
• Average Time Required from Start-up till IPO:                 7 years
• Average Capital Required per Year till IPO (Burn):             $6.8M
• Average IPO Proceeds:                                                    $76M
• Additional Capital Raised After the IPO:                           $243M
• Average Total Capital Raised:                                          $363M
• Average Market Capitalization:                                      $1,262M
• Companies Who are Profitable:                                            8

The costs of getting a SaaS start-up off the ground are substantial but only about half of the firms we tracked actually started out as a pure SaaS company.   These other Cross-Over firms started out as either Application Service Providers (ASP’s) or were traditional On-premise ISV’s that move to SaaS through a combination of organic migration or through a series of acquisitions.  Companies like Concur, Kenexa, Taleo and Ultimate Software have all transitioned to SaaS from an on-premise heritage.

Montclair Advisors - SaaS Start Up Costs - Pre IPO

The shortest time to go from start-up phase to an IPO was 4 years and the longest was 13 years.  Most of the firms we tracked were founded between 1997 to 1999, which was prior and during the Internet Bubble.

When these firms went public they raised a range between $30M (LivePerson and Ultimate Software) to over $150M (DealerTrack and NetSuite), but on average they raised about $75M.  All the firms then went on to do additional capital raises from $32M (LivePerson) up to $750M (DealerTrack) but on average each raised $243M!   The total capital raised, when considering both pre IPO, IPO and post IPO capital raised, these firms raised between $100M (LivePerson and Ultimate Software) to close to more than $500M (DealerTrack, Salesforce.com and SuccessFactors).

Montclair Advisors - SaaS Start Up Costs - Post IPO

After going public, this SaaS market basket of companies have done well as a group.  The majority of the firms are profitable, which makes for solid cash flow performance, revenue visibility and overall stability of the company’s stock, for the real SaaS firms.

The most valuable company, based on their Market Cap is Salesforce.com at more than $8B and there are at least 4 other SaaS firms with valuations over $1B (Blackboard, Concur, NetSuite and SuccessFactors).  When comparing the amount of capital raised to the market valuation, the 5 best performing firms are Salesforce.com (.09), Ultimate Software (.13) , Concur (.19), RightNow (.22) and LivePerson (.31).

Montclair Advisors - SaaS Start Up Costs - Market Caps

This year, as the economy improves, promises to launch a few new SaaS IPOs and we will continue to track this core group as well as a larger group of Hybrids and Cross Overs and will periodically report back with our findings.

Last week at Salesforce.com’s Dreamforce conference, the big news was around the launch of the new business collaboration set of platform capabilities called “Chatter”.

After updating the audience on Service and Sales Cloud 2, which both had some really cool new capabilities, Marc Benioff announced the latest Cloud offering – Chatter or the Collaboration Cloud.

This new business collaboration offering, which was never to be confused with Social CRM, consists of a wide range of Chatter platform capabilities. Many of which look very similar to Twitter, but don’t get confused, this is NOT Twitter. Although Chatter will be integrated with popular social networking sitesl like Twitter and Facebook, these integrations are only feeds into Chatter.

The key line that kept getting repeated was “Why do I know more about strangers on Facebook than I do about my own employees?” This apparently was a major driver in the development of Chatter by Salesforce.

On a funny note, during the analyst meeting, someone asked Marc if he was going provide Chatter on-premise? (Remember Salesforce is in the Cloud!) In a sarcastic reply said that he was actually packaging up the Exodata Chatter servers and that they were being shipped out to clients at the time of the launch. That got a big laugh from the audience. This was also humorous because Chatter won’t be Generally Available in the Cloud until sometime in 2010.

Key capabilities include employee profiles, status updates that are familiar with LinkedIn and Facebook, Groups, external and internal feeds, ability to share content with groups and events, alerts and notifications that allow for your apps to speak to you, an extensible API for the Force.com platform, integration with Google Docs, Twitter and Facebook. To learn more watch this Chatter demo by Parker Harris, Salesforce.com’s EVP of products of the opening day keynote.

Unlike other emerging business-related Social CRM players like Jive Software (SAP partner), Lithium, RightNow or even Oracle, Salesforce seems to be focusing much of it competitive energies against Microsoft SharePoint. I think this is probably a red herring.

Another major benefit to the Chatter strategy is the addition of a new Salesforce mascot family. Saasy now has Chatty. People were lining up to get their photo with both of these mascots… wow.

Here’s what I think the real Chatter strategy is based on…

• Stickiness. This is a ‘fun’ business application and if it is widely adopted as a business collaboration tool, it will be hard to replace. This process may take awhile for this adoption to take place but it will have lasting impact on their clients. The flip side to stickiness is that customers will be much less likely to cancel their service if they are hooked on it. With industry attrition averages between 10-20%, this could have a real hidden benefit. This is especially interesting in that they are giving the basic Chatter capability away with the basic and enterprise subscription licensing. Wonder if they have modeled out this impact?

• Barrier to entry. I think that it is interesting that Salesforce is thinking that this capability might actually upset Oracle Fusion and SAP’s next generation of SaaS offerings because it would require a rewrite of their core platforms. Actually this might make it more likely that SAP might do more than expand their partnership with Jive Software, and force them into a situation where they might have to buy them to keep up with the Benioff’s. With Fusion targeted for GA some time in 2010 (probably December), if they were to add in a robust collaboration capability, it would most certainly delay the GA, which would push Fusion into 2011. So Chatter becomes a key differentiator for Salesforce, even if it experiences low user adoption.

• Facebook and Twitter. By aligning themselves with these leading social networking platforms, Salesforce will be able to differentiate their solutions as hip compared to the older generation. With all types of younger workers continuing to move into the market, this makes Salesforce solutions possibly more interesting to the Generation Y workforce.

• Productivity. By putting collaboration (email, chat, document and knowledge management) in context to various business processes, the hidden strategic benefit might actually be a more productive workforce – closing more deals, resolving more issues, and engaging more employees. Because this is a solution that doesn’t need any training, it could be rolled out broadly without a lot of costly change management activities. Difficult to quantify this benefit but as more use cases become exposed over the next 6-12 months, this will be a really interesting benefit to solutions like Chatter.

So what are the issues with Chatter?

• Security. Kept emphasizing that Chatter has been built on a common security architecture that is the same one being used by Salesforce, which meets stringent bank-level security requirements. This actually might be a CIO selling point because it might be a way to reel in employees who are social networking with corporate information on unsecure sites like Facebook and Twitter. By integrating with them but controlling the internal networking, and not allowing export of data to these sites, the security teams can at least protect data access and distribution.

• Adoption. Salesforce has never really launched a enterprise-wide application before and Chatter is even a different animal than a traditional employee-oriented application. This is uncharted territory for Salesforce and it is unclear how rapid or widespread the adoption of their technology will be. What is good is that Marc Benioff did mention that they are not making any projections on what is going to happen with Chatter, they figure it will be popular but were reluctant to make predictions based on wide-scale adoption. It is in Salesforce’s best interest to make sure Chatter is successful because even modest adoption would ensure a level stickiness that their current applications may not even enjoy.

Just try and take away someone’s Facebook and you will understand stickiness!

If employees only want to use Twitter, they probably won’t like Chatter.

So how much does it cost? For existing Salesforce customers who have already purchased seat of Sales or Service Cloud, those seats will get Chatter at no cost, which is good deal. For those employees who don’t have Salesforce seats but want to have limited access to Chatter, the pricing is $50/seat/month. After talking to a product manager on the Dreamforce show floor about this, it seems like a lot of money for almost no functionality. My guess is that when they roll out Chatter later in 2010, they will have a better thought out plan around pricing

In the end, the Chatter strategy makes a lot of sense. The customers I spoke to about it really like it and I will anxiously await the official launch in 2010.