With Dreamforce ‘11 coming up later this month, I thought it might be interesting to do a quick review of what I am seeing in the market around the Force.com initiative. Salesforce has been one of the early proponents of using a Platform-as-a-Service or PaaS solution in building out your SaaS business. I believe that the Force.com platform offers new and existing ISV’s several real value propositions:
Pay-as-you-go pricing model. This is really helpful to small companies just getting started and Salesforce will allow the customers to tie their their revenues to the royalty fees for the platform.
Packaged platform. The platform contains everything from a development kit, database, configurable UI, reporting and the hosting infrastructure, all for one price. In addition to the price advantages it is just the streamlining of vendor relationships by getting all of your technology from a single supplier.
Elastic scalability. Because Force.com is built on the Salesforce infrastructure, it can scale up and down to meet the needs of high transaction or even periodic type applications. This is a very nice feature that makes true multi-tenant Cloud Computing infrastructures so cost efficient to operate.
For a company that is new to the Cloud and looking to launch a SaaS business quickly, Force is a great way to start. Based on some of my discussions with clients and other ISVs, here are some of the real and perceived challenges associated with Force.com and other PaaS solutions.
Lock-in. Most companies tell me that having a PaaS package is attractive but they don’t like putting all of their technology needs in the hands of a single provider.
Development environment. For many companies who are used to coding in Java or other languages, the Apex 4GL language is not very appealing to hard core developers. It also doesn’t offer enough flexibility for certain types of applications.
Complexity. Companies who offer complex enterprise applications that require robust rules and calculation engines, workflow, integration or are offering other types of deep infrastructure solutions, find that Force is not a good match for their requirements.
Even with these potential drawbacks, there are many companies who are building their SaaS businesses on top of the Force platform. Here is my short list of some of the more well know firms:
FinancialForce. The company is a joint venture between Salesforce.com and Unit4, a Dutch ERP firm. FinancialForce offers both financial and professional services applications.
RemedyForce. Developed by BMC Software and Salesforce.com, it is based on the popular Remedy ITIL and help desk product.
AgileVision. This is CA Technologies Agile development tool based on Force.com.
ServiceMax. Independent company that is offering a Cloud-based Field Service Management solution. The company just landed a Series B round of funding for $14M.
JobScience. Offers a talent relationship management suite on top of Force.com.
Veeva Systems. Offers CRM and regulated content management solutions.
BasicGov. Delivers a suite of applications designed for the needs of state and local governments.
CyberU. Cloud-based learning management system.
Less Software. Provides a light-weight supply chain management software product.
Other traditional software firms, or Hybrids, and even some SaaS firms are using the Force.com platform to extend their existing products and solutions. Some of these companies include:
Last week at Salesforce.com’s Dreamforce conference, it was interesting to see how their Platform-as-a-Service offering, Force.com is starting to gain momentum among the Independent Software Vendor community including Computer Associates and BMC Software.
What is clear for traditional software providers who are starting think seriously about getting into the SaaS and Computing arena, it might be cheaper and faster to use a partner platform than trying to re-invent the wheel. Both CA and BMC have resources to rewrite their older applications but it isn’t the cost that seems to drive them it is the time to market. Force.com can provide a real advantage to software firms who have the domain expertise but lack the infrastructure and skills required to write Cloud and SaaS-based products quickly.
Other interesting aspects are that traditional ISV’s are not rewriting the old applications they have, they are re-inventing these applications leveraging newer development techniques. CA’s Agile Planner is actually filling a hole in the company’s product portfolio and could be a logical cross-sell or up-sell product for them. BMC’s Service Desk offering is designed to dove tail with Salesforce’s Service Cloud 2 offering, and provide something else ISV’s are looking for, leverage.
I am sure that many traditional software firms will have the internal discussion about build, buy or partner their way into SaaS. Up until recently there hasn’t been a good partner alternative for ISV’s who wanted to build their own solutions but were looking for a partner with SaaS and Cloud Computing expertise. Even though rumors abound about Oracle looking to buy Salesforce, firms competitive to Oracle like CA and BMC are dipping their toes in the water.
For these firms leverage doesn’t just stop at the platform, Salesforce delivers a very effective go-to-market capability that few other partners can offer. Witness the 19,000 participants at Dreamforce. This type of reach and ability to get IT and business buyers attention might make a bet on Force.com worth the risk. More importantly, these firms are also looking to bridge their older brands to the Cloud by bridging the Salesforce brand power. CA and BMC aren’t the only firms interested in upgrading their image how about Dell, Callidus, Fujitsui (Glovia) and the momentum is growing. According to the AppExchange, there are currently more than 200 native Force.com applications currently available.
While at Dreamforce I spent some time with the FinancialForce.com team at the booth and this is a really interesting story. FinancialForce.com is a wholly owned subsidiary of a European software firm, Agresso and their CODA division.
FinancialForce.com was started about three years ago at the time that Salesforce.com initially launched the Force.com platform. Jeremy Roche the CEO at FinancialForce.com, reached out to Marc Benioff to just learn on how to build a net-new SaaS product and learned about their platform. They had a number of discussions and then finally decided to build their new accounts receivable product on Force.com in 2006.
The CODA team started out by building an integration connector Saleforce.com and the CODA2Go (On-demand version) of their Accounts Receivable module. They wanted to understand how the products worked together and that required workflow between products. It took them about a year to get comfortable with the Force.com platform, there were issues that were specific to complex ERP-like applications but Salesforce was responsive and did update the platform to support these deficiencies.
Once the new company was formed, FinancialForce.com, CODA then built out an Enterprise Service BUS (ESB) to connect their SaaS solutions with their on-premise solutions. One of FinancialForce.com’s early customers, a UK-based newspaper, were using Salesforce for their CRM requirements and CODA for their back office financials but were custom developing an invoicing/AR solution. When approached about the FinancialForce.com AR module as a possible solution, what was appealing to the customer that this solution was able to integrate to both Salesforce.com and CODA. About 6 months ago FinancialForce.com also launched their General Ledger and Accounts Payable modules and now they have a solid SMB mini-financial suite.
As more partners begin building and launching applications and businesses on top of Force.com, it is clear that the momentum is building.