As it turned out I was right about 50% of my predictions last year, so here’s my educated guesses for what is going to happen to the SaaS market in 2012:
#10 Oracle will buy Netsuite.
I know this isn’t much of a surprise since Larry Ellison owns approximately 65% of Netsuite, but with the RightNow acquisition, this type of move makes more sense as part of coordinated Cloud acquisition strategy.
#9 SaaS IPO window remains open.
There are a number of SaaS firms who have either filed, like Eloqua, or are seriously considering going public in 2012, like Workday, Dropbox, Box, and Guidewire. This window can be opened even wider by successful IPO’s from companies like Yelp and Facebook. The only problem is that there are over 100 companies who have already filed to go public in 2012, so it might be difficult for smaller SaaS firms to do their IPO.
#8. Master brands will continue to chase SaaS offerings.
IBM just purchased DemandTec and SAP bought SuccessFactors, while Oracle bought RightNow. This is a big change from 2010 when most of these companies were not interested in the Cloud or SaaS. All of these master brands have tried to build their own SaaS businesses, but I think they have now finally realized that SaaS is a business model, not just new technology. The smart firms will keep their SaaS businesses and their core license businesses separate and not try and merge them. Good luck.
#7. Workday will have a monster IPO.
There is no doubt that the 2012 IPO of Facebook will set all sorts of records but for enterprise software, I think Workday will be one of the biggest on record. The company just took in $85 million in funding over the past few months, in what was termed an IPO preview round. Workday could raise as much as $500 million in an IPO, which would force the big ERP players to start building out their SaaS businesses as a defensive strategy at the bare minimum.
#6. SaaS starts to go global.
I was involved in an Oracle SaaS webinar a couple of weeks ago for an audience in Europe and the response was really impressive. I initially thought that most of the registrants would be from the UK, the Netherlands, Germany and Scandinavia. Actually there were attendees from almost every country in Europe. I have also started to hear about strong SaaS interest in Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, Japan, China and many other countries. 2012 will just continue to build on the SaaS market’s growing global momentum.
#5. Salesforce continues to expand beyond CRM.
During 2011 Salesforce purchased several firms that added new capabilities to their platform including DimDim (collaboration), Radian6 (social analytics), Model Metrics (mobility) and then they bought Rypple in December, which launched them into the Human Capital market. I predict that Salesforce will add several other HCM tuck-in acquisitions (JobScience, Jobvite), financial applications (FinancialForce, Zuora), or even supply chain management (Glovia OM, Kenandy).
#4. IT Management and Security SaaS offerings emerge.
Companies like CA have been successful in launching their new Nimsoft ITM SaaS offering during 2011, but there are also many other firms that are beginning to gain momentum with their new SaaS offerings as well. This is a very big market opportunity to replace existing legacy infrastructure and security offerings. Companies to watch include Service-Now, Trustwave, Splunk, PingIdentity and Proofpoint.
(Note: CA/Nimsoft and PingIdentity are Montclair Advisors clients)
#3. SaaS continues to be social.
With Jive going public during December 2011, they are just the most recent example of SaaS social applications gaining market acceptance. Salesforce has been very successful with their Chatter and Radian6 offerings. Independents like Yammer, SocialCast, Lithium and CentralDesktop will continue to see increased demand for their social/collaboration platforms.
#2. More big VC rounds for SaaS firms.
2012 will continue to see VC’s put a lot of money to work with leading SaaS companies. We saw some major investments during 2011 including Box ($81 million), Dropbox ($250 million), HubSpot ($32 million), Marketo ($50 million), Workday ($85 million) and Zuora ($35 million). This trend will continue in 2012 and companies will be putting a lot of money to work to build out their platforms and distribution capabilities.
#1. Storage is a major story for 2012.
As more and more data is stored in the Cloud, consumers and businesses are looking to all different types of on-line storage services. During the year that Apple launched its iCloud small business and music storage service, we also saw major funding rounds for SaaS companies including Dropbox and Box. We even saw a new IPO from Carbonite that provides a small business/consumer Cloud back-up service. This is definitely a segment of the SaaS market to keep an eye on in 2012.
Montclair Advisors did a SaaS business profile in April 2009 and recently participated in the company’s SuccessConnect 2011 in San Francisco, where we were able to hear from key members of their management team about recent news and a business update.
SuccessFactors had changed their focus about two years to be corporate performance management focused. Darryl Dickens their new chief marketing officer announced that although Business X is still the core positioning, they wanted to reach back out to the HR buyer. Their new tag line is now more HR friendly; ‘It’s time to love work again.’ (… and by the way, I like the new branding).
With the new branding SuccessFactors wanted to re-focus their messaging around being a proven, visionary Cloud-brand for HR and business performance solutions. This new branding means there is a new logo, website, and icon system.
Part of the strategy behind the re-branding has to do with the new products and capabilities now available across the SuccessFactors product portfolio including collaboration (CubeTree), learning (Plateau and Jambok), reporting and analytics (YouCalc and Infohrm) and HRMS like Employee Central. The new brand is a laminate designed to put a logical wrapper around the suite, which can help to rationalize product bundles, pricing and packaging.
As customers have grown more comfortable with the Cloud, those who have older versions of PeopleSoft are now looking for alternative options for their core HR systems, and that is where Employee Central fits in. The Employee Central solution has been built for the BizX suite to integrate talent management, analytics, collaboration as well as employee services. Employee Central 2.0 was made GA in March 2011.
Most talent management providers have shied away from offering a system of HR system of record. SuccessFactors sees a real opportunity to integrate their offerings as well as a potentially large market for new Cloud-based HRIS offerings. As Workday offers not only core HR solutions but also talent management applications, both of these firms are chasing a growing replacement market in the SMB and enterprise markets.
Employee Central offers a basic system of record but stops short of a full HR and payroll system. SuccessFactors has decided to partner for payroll with Patersons, Ceridian and Meta4.
The biggest news was that SuccessFactors purchased SaaS-based talent management provider Plateau Systems in April 2011 for $290 million in cash and stock. This was the largest acquisition to-date for SuccessFactors and marked the first time that the company had purchased a talent management application instead of an add-on technology. Plateau has a large and satisfied customer-base of both commercial and federal accounts.
Doug Dennerline, SuccessFactors new president (ex-Salesforce.com) was very clear that they were planning on getting very close to Plateau’s customers and assure them that they will allow them to do what makes the most sense for their businesses. Unlike the other learning-related acquisition, Jambok, Plateau offered an enterprise-class Learning Management System with a world-class customer-base. Plateau not only adds revenues and customers but also provides an interesting SaaS architecture and platform that SuccessFactors may be able to leverage to service their their very largest customers.
With this business combination, SuccessFactors is now one of the largest HCM SaaS providers based on total revenues, customers and numbers of users. After all of these acquisitions, it is clear that the company now has many different growth engines moving into 2012. Based on our briefing with the very seasoned SuccessFactors management team, it will be interesting to see how they are able to integrate all of these offerings and manage all of these potential business opportunities.

Mercer HR Outsourcing and Consulting Briefing
Mercer provided an update on their HR outsourcing, talent management and consulting products and services for 2011. Mercer is a major player in the overall Human Capital Management and Health and Benefits markets with total revenues at $3.5 billion, 27,000 customers, and over 4 million employees using their solutions. Here is a quick take on some of the interesting things that they are up to.
Mercer’s global outsourcing leadership provided an update on their business that includes their Total Benefits and point solutions outsourcing offerings. The company has made an important shift from the broader HRO market to focus more on their strength around Total Benefits Outsourcing or TBO. Mercer’s outsourcing clients make up 80% of the US Fortune 500, so they are very strong at the high-end of the market.
In a recent announcement Mercer is now partnering with SAP in Germany for their pension administration. This partnership will allow SAP to deliver a robust pension solution to their large German and multi-national customers including organizations like Dow, Rockwood Holdings and J.P Morgan.
Mercer has made a major investment in building out a very high quality offshore processing center in India, their Global Operations and Shared Services center over the past 2-3 years. The key to making this offshore capability work is that Mercer isn’t just outsourcing benefits work to a partner, the GOSS employees are Mercer employees and part of their core delivery teams. Today this service center handles only back office and delivery functions, at a much lower cost than could be achieved from US-based resources. This positions the company to offer lower cost TBO solutions to mid-market sized organizations. Mercer also doesn’t offshore their call center or employee-facing functions to India at this time, due to possible concerns from their customers, these functions are still handled by US employees.
Mercer’s Americas operations provided an overview of their business which is primarily based on their TBO platform. Mercer’s Health and Benefits business capabilities include defined contribution, defined benefits, health and benefits and absence management. Their TBO business typically services clients with at least 7,500 employees and more than 80% of their new clients are leaving existing benefits engagements with other industry providers. Unlike competitors, Mercer’s Americas TBO business has very high customer retention rates, in excess of 95%.
Recently launched their integrated Performance and Rewards solution built on top of PeopleclickAuthoria’s SaaS-based talent management platform. This solution has been infused with Mercer’s rewards best practices as well as a link to their ePRISM compensation management technology. Mercer clients and prospects like the idea of leveraging the company’s extensive embedded intellectual capital, integrated into a leading a TMS SaaS platform to help them deliver faster and better HR transformations.
The initial uptake on the offering has been a little slower than they planned but are now seeing stronger momentum and should be able to announce some new wins in the second half of this year.
Mercer’s Information Products team previewed their upcoming product called the Workforce Information Network that is a new rewards analytics platform that accesses Mercer’s vast warehouse of compensation and job family information. Mercer has compiled comprehensive data from more than 20 million employees and 8,000 organizations globally.
The Mercer WIN offering is now in beta, with 50 charter clients, and the company is planning to expand the offering to service up to 10,000 users by the end of 2011. The plan for 2012 is to broaden the available data sources to include survey data from other providers along with other Mercer data, that will them to deliver libraries of benchmarks for pricing, reporting and survey submissions. These tools will allow their clients to deliver more competitive pay programs segmented by regions and against their peer groups. Over time this data can be shared among other Mercer offerings including ePRISM and with the Human Capital Connect product set.
This potentially is a very interesting subscription service based on a large data asset that Mercer has been sitting on, that could be made available to all of the company’s clients over the next few years.
Montclair Advisors had done a SaaS business profile of Patersons in April 2010 and we wanted to get an update from their new CEO, Andrew Pearson. Andrew was brought into the company shortly after our profile was completed and came from SaaS collaboration provider IntraLinks where he was the Managing Director of EMEA.
With the change in management, the company has re-focused its strategy primarily around providing a robust global payroll software and services platform. This has been the company’s strength over time and they felt that this approach would open up some new ways to partner with the leading SaaS Talent Management and HCM providers if they weren’t also offering competitive products. Patersons solutions tend to be a very agile and can fit into any organization’s environment based on their infrastructure requirements. In addition, to their software platform Patersons will continue to offer customers a managed services option for their payroll processing needs.
The big news was Paterson’s new partnership with Workday and how they were planning on supporting several of their larger customers who were looking for global payroll capability. Workday is focusing more on building out their financials platform in the near term and less on extending their payroll solutions, so partnering with Patersons for their Logon2 global payroll platform makes a lot of sense. The plan is to offer Workday customers not only their HCM and Talent Management solutions but also an integrated global payroll solution that allows the customer to turn off competitive payroll solutions over time. Often these types of companies may have many different payroll providers by the countries or regions that they are doing business in and by consolidating onto a single platform over time, this approach can deliver value on many different levels. This partnership was announced in January 2011.
The other big announcement that occurred after my interview with Andrew was that SuccessFactors had formed a similar partnership with Patersons’ for global payroll. Patersons will join the SuccessFactors’ partner program as a Strategic SuccessCloud Partner to provide complementary global payroll services to SuccessFactors’ multi-national customer base. The Patersons product will also be integrated into SuccessFactors’ Employee Central product, which will allow customers to streamline their payroll administration especially for multi-national operations.
This re-focused strategy has been working with the company experiencing strong growth in excess of 40% annual growth and currently support more than 160 countries. Patersons today is concentrating on offering core ‘gross-to-net’ capabilities to 15 countries and will continue to expand their payroll platform out to up to 50 high GDP states and regions over the next few years. The only other software firm that has this level of cover is SAP but they aren’t going to SaaS anytime in the near future.
The future vision for Patersons is to offer their customers and partners a fully integrated global solution that allows large firms control over their payroll, ability to comply with governmental regulations as well as to reduce the cost of administration. For many of their target customers, who have grown through M&A, they have multiple vendors and a lot of technology, this level of complexity is driving up costs, and Patersons can help to streamline their payroll processes using both software and managed services.
The re-focusing of the Patersons’ strategy to primarily offer a SaaS-based global payroll platform appears to be gaining momentum and it appears that they are a company to watch here in the second half of 2011.
By Kevin Dobbs
Montclair Advisors, LLC
The best-in-class SaaS companies are obsessed with operational efficiency, and they are constantly testing and monitoring all different types of business processes to improve speed and reduce costs.
A good example of this focus on efficiency is the use of the Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) metric to measure the overall effectiveness of marketing and sales efforts. Since it is not possible for a SaaS firm to spend as much to sell new customers like a traditional software company, this becomes a very important efficiency metric to track because it has a direct impact on both the top and bottom line of the company.
SaaS Metrics
Just like CAC, there are a number of other process-specific SaaS business metrics that are commonplace for firms to use to monitor all areas of their company. Leading firms will usually track some subset of these types of these SaaS metrics on a quarterly, monthly or even in some cases daily basis. Here is a list of sample SaaS metrics that I have shared with my clients that can be used to kick start the discussion with operational groups inside of a firm that is considering a move to SaaS:
The most obvious areas to track are revenues, COGS, cash flows, bookings, CAC, profits, customer satisfaction, customer lifetime value, revenue per unit, customer satisfaction and churn. Beyond that there are a myriad of process specific metrics and dashboards that can be tracked and monitored, but start with the most important ones first.
Other Resources
Here are some great sources of information on SaaS metrics including:
David Skok of Matrix Partners, forEntrepreneurs blog and his SaaS Metrics post, which is really comprehensive and easy to read.
ReadWrite Cloud’s, 6 SaaS Metrics You Should Track
Michael Dunham of Scio Consulting, Haut SaaS Blog did a great post on SaaS Metrics – SaaSoNomics 101
Joel York’s Chaotic Flow Blog is always really useful and he did a fantastic post on SaaS Metrics and Economics. Joel provides a very scientific approach and a lot of details for those who are really interested in getting into what comprises SaaS metrics theory.
Some firms like j2Communications tracks hundreds of metrics related to their subscription software services but it took them ten years to get to that point. My advice to clients is always, start with something simple, make sure that works and then you can always add complexity as you go along.
It is always hard to predict the future, but here are my 10 Predictions for the SaaS market in 2011, and they might just happen:
A number of large consumer subscription software players including Facebook, Groupon, LinkedIn, Zynga and Skype could really open up the public markets with a major blockbuster IPO (or IPO’s) in 2011. SaaS firms that look to get everyone’s attention with potential IPO’s next year include Cornerstone OnDemand, Workday, Marketo, Service-Now and possibly Plateau.
So my prediction (which is a pure guess) is that SuccessFactors and Taleo finally get over their respective CEO ego issues and decide to merge. Sounds a little crazy, but when you really consider their product portfolios, there might not be as much of an overlap as you might think. SuccessFactors is basically a performance and analytics company and Taleo is a recruiting and learning (after acquiring Learn.com) company. They both have some additional components that could be plugged into to create a more comprehensive suite of CPM and Talent Management offerings.
This would also create a combined company with a market cap approaching (SFSF + TLEO) $4B and annual revenues in excess of $400M, which would be the second largest SaaS firm in the market, and a clear leader in their space. Another potential marriage might be Concur and Ultimate Software.
It seems like most Oracle SaaS rumors involve the acquisition of Salesforce.com, and that may happen some day, but the more likely combination for 2011 is NetSuite. Larry Ellison is a major investor in NetSuite (early investor) and own/controls more that 50% of the company’s shares. He may come to the conclusion that he needs some real SaaS DNA inside of Oracle to help grow their Fusion business in 2011 and beyond.
Similar to the realization that many other major traditional ISV’s will come to in 2011, that they are too far beyond in SaaS to catch up organically, SAP will buy their way into SaaS. The Business ByDesign project for SAP, by some estimates, has cost more than $1 billion and there isn’t much to show for it. I always thought that the Sybase acquisition was just a smoke screen to cover up how little progress has been made with BBD at their most recent Sapphire user meeting. Like Oracle, I think SAP reaches out into the market and purchases a SaaS firm to jump start BBD. RightNow would be an interesting choice since SAP wants to make a splash in the CRM market.
These big software companies are no longer just paying lip service to SaaS or the Cloud, they continue to catch up with the subscription software market transition that is happening everywhere. All sizes of customers who were battered during the recession are no longer interested in spending a lot of capital and time that has been associated with traditional software projects and are becoming increasing comfortable with SaaS. This shift in the Software market is massive and is going to take at least 10 years, and we are probably only in the second year (post-recession) of this shift. Continue to look to see what SaaS moves firms like Oracle, SAP, HP, CA and Infor make in 2011.
Look at Salesforce.com’s recent moves to expand their Force.com Platform-as-a-Service portfolio with VMForce and then buying Ruby on Rails provider Heroku for over $200 million. Beyond Force.com there are many other offerings here today and coming in 2011 including App Engine by Google, Apprenda, Azure by Microsoft, Corent, Engine Yard, Facebook, Flex by Adobe, Fusion by Oracle, Intalio, IPP by Intuit, LongJump, Nimbula, SuiteCloud by NetSuite, and Wolf Frameworks.
As long as traditional ISV’s continue to move towards SaaS, there will be a green field opportunity for all types of PaaS solutions. Look for several of these firms to be acquired in 2011 by larger ISV’s.
After attending Dreamforce this month, it was curious to see a number of Force.com firms offering ERP extensions starting to gain real market momentum. Companies like FinancialForce.com (they purchased Appirio’s PSE business) who are delivering a growing suite of financial and accounting applications, JobScience who continue to build out their Talent Relationship Management suite on Force.com, Less Software who is selling a targeted Supply Chain Management solution and even Remedy’s Service Desk offering, RemedyForce Cloud. If Salesforce offers an attractive exit for any of these firms or their Force.com products, like they did with Heroku, then it might be possible to do a quick roll-up of key partners to create a competitive Cloud-based ERP solution.
Interestingly this type of move might be triggered by Oracle buying Netsuite or Workday going public.
Although Private Clouds might be a viable alternative for enterprises who are looking to leverage the economics of the Cloud, for software companies this type of approach will only provide short term ‘Fake SaaS‘ types of solutions. This type of business model of hosting single-tenant software was known as Application Service Providers (ASP’s) and none of these companies that emerged about 10 years ago were able to find a business model that really scaled profitably. Private Clouds will offer a short term technology transition steps for software companies who are moving away from just offering traditional on-premise software but this trend will really start to fade by later next year.
At Dreamforce ‘10 Salesforce.com announced that they are launching their new Database.com offering, a Database in the Cloud. What was interesting about this news is that Salesforce is really just reselling a private-label version of Oracle’s database technology. For Salesforce this is a unique way to take proven Oracle software, designed for on-premise deployment, and create a true subscription-based version of this product. No doubt that Salesforce will need to do some work to create a massive multi-tenant version of an ORACLE database and then deliver it as a service, but they are already doing this today through their Force.com platform. This could be a significant new revenue stream for both companies and look for other SaaS firms to try OEM’ing their software as a way to improve their CAGRs in 2011.
This should be an interesting year as the economy improves and the SaaS market really begins to gain some serious momentum. It should be a fun time to be in the Software business again.
Kevin Dobbs, Montclair Advisors, LLC
By Kevin Dobbs
The last few months have been quite active in the SaaS market and here are some things that caught my attention:
Who would have believed that we would be seeing Initial Public Offerings after our recent recession but new offerings include SciQuest (NASDAQ: SQI), Qlik Technologies (NASDAQ: QLIK), Ancestory.com (NASDAQ: ACOM) and Financial Engines (NASDAQ: FNGN). There are a number of upcoming IPO’s including Talent Management provider Cornerstone OnDemand.
Last week’s Oracle OpenWorld show was quite an event with many different story lines including the tie-in to the Iron Man 2 movie. In fact, in the main area outside the keynote hall there were three Iron Man suites along side their Exadata and Exalogic cousins. So here is what we learned:
Cloud in a Box according to Marc Benioff and Larry Ellison. There was quite a number of heated, yet humorous references to Marc Benioff’s (CEO at Salesforce) comments related to Oracle’s view of Cloud Computing that it has to reside in an Exadata box. In fact in one session I attended, he even said that the Internet was not made of Cloud boxes that were even taller than Marc, and he is tall. In the Sunday afternoon session, Larry was very dismissive of both Marc’s vision of the Internet and his book Behind the Cloud. If you have some time check out Marc Benioff’s OpenWorld keynote, very funny.
| Different Viewpoints about Cloud Computing | |||
| Larry Ellison - Oracle | Marc Benioff - Salesforce.com | ||
| Big Picture View | Cloud in a Box | Cloud on a Box | |
| Centralization | Centralized Computing | De-Centralized Computing | |
| Scaleability | Scale up | Scale out | |
| Target Buyer | CIO | Business executive | |
| Pricing | Mostly license | Subscription | |
| Control | Compliance | Experimentation | |
| Cost | $$$ | $ | |
| Big Trend | Vertical Integration | Consumerization of Software | |
What is really interesting is that in many ways they are both right. Larry is very famous about a his rant on Cloud Computing and that it is nothing more than a network, servers and software. This is true, even the most Cloudy providers in the market like Amazon and Salesforce.com are dependent on a real infrastructure that can scale and is reliable and many of these firms are Oracle customers.
On the other hand, Marc is right that the Cloud is less about buying, building and maintaining this scalable architecture and more about leveraging a firm that provides their Infrastructure-as-a-Service. This has been one of the main catalysts for the software industry’s move to a subscription business model or SaaS, just like Salesforce.com.
In some ways both companies are right, it just depends on your viewpoint. I think that Oracle is thinking more like IBM and HP and Salesforce is more aligned to Facebook and Zynga. Even though Larry and Marc were both exchanging jabs last week, they are both customers of each other, and in the end that is good for all of their customers.
Mark Hurd looks like he fits in well with Oracle. The keynote sessions where Mark presented, he was relaxed and really knew the material. Given Oracle’s absorption of Sun, it is really helpful to have someone with Mark Hurd’s background helping Larry run the company. The hardware business is quite different than running a software firm and Oracle was able to secure one of the best hardware executives in the industry from HP.
Oracle is really embracing the hardware world. It was interesting to see the focus on the new Exadata and Exalogic products. The company’s messaging revolved around performance, availability, security and management and not very much around applications or Cloud Computing. A lot of discussion around hardware and software being engineered together to create these incredibly powerful database and middleware server platforms. But does this approach raise concerns around ‘vendor lock-in‘? This hardware-centric strategy makes sense because Oracle really views IBM as their biggest competitor and they need to monetize the Sun acquisition as well.
Fusion applications are coming at the end of the year, but not sure if anyone at Oracle cares. Larry told the crowd that the writing of the new Oracle Fusion applications for Financial Management, Procurement and Sourcing, Project and Portfolio Management, Human Capital Management, Customer Relationship Management, Supply Chain Management, and Governance Risk and Compliance. These are the products that were promised last year at OpenWorld but they appear to be real at this point. Although I didn’t attend the deep dive sessions for Fusion, others who did told me that they have done a good job. At the Wednesday afternoon keynote, the demos of the products looked good and the user interface looks quite modern.
According to Larry the writing of the new Fusion applications was the biggest development project in Oracle’s history, it was interesting to see that there was little for no fanfare surrounding this major milestone. As long as the Fusion applications sell more database and infrastructure software and more Exadata servers, I guess that’s what is important. The successful roll out of the Fusion applications later in the year is going to be important for the overall software market but I doubt it will really impact the leading SaaS providers like Salesforce.com, Taleo, SuccessFactors or Workday. It will be interesting to see how Oracle evolves its thinking about the applications market and it’s approach to the Cloud, because that is where all the growth will come over the next 5 years.
By Kevin Dobbs
Montclair Advisors, LLC
Let’s face it, Hunters and Farmers are very different types of sales people. One is into the thrill of the chase and the high anxiety of selling the next big deal. The other is into cultivating relationships, building communities and patience.
When it comes to sales people inside of a SaaS company, these same attributes apply to this team as well. Trying to get your major account or direct sales reps to effectively manage your existing accounts and still hit an aggressive quota, that usually doesn’t work that well. The same holds true if you are trying to get your account managers to push their customers to close a big deal, and they just don’t want to push too hard because they might ruin their relationship. Then why are you trying to get them to do the same job?
The other big difference is usually how these sales professionals get compensated. A typical software sales rep will have a $1.5-$3M annual quota and want to make at least $200K, where as an account manager might have a much smaller quota, $300-$750K and be making $110-150K. That’s because they have different skill sets but both types of sales are critically important when building your SaaS sales team. Philippe Botteri from BVP discusses what Gary Messiana an EIR told him about how he compensated his reps for delivering MRR:
The second thing he did was to define was the ramp up of the commission rate to make sure the best sales rep would get the most upside. To do that, he applied another simple rule:
I like the simplicity of the concept and it can be applied to all types of sales roles.
Depending on the type of products/services you are selling, you may actually not have high priced outside sales reps and actually focus more on building out a low cost tele-sales capability. Even if you do this, you should still separate out your new sales team from your account management teams. Because SaaS is perfect for the ‘penetrate and radiate‘ sales model, you need teams that can sell that first product and then another team that keeps the customer happy and renewing as well as buying more products and services.
Bessemer Venture’s 10 Laws for being SaaSy also recommends separating your hunters from your farmers. It is important to be able to find new customers but it is also important to be able to renew, upsell and cross-sell customers additional products, which will increase your company’s Monthly Recurring Revenues. This well defined sales structure works well with many of the leading SaaS firms including RightNow and Salesforce.com.
One of the big objections about this type of approach is that if forces the customer to deal with two different sales teams. Although this can be a problem, I have found that these types of channel conflicts can be remedied by using team based compensation plans that have everyone getting paid based on shared goals related to existing customers. This type of approach also encourages development of up-sells/cross-sell opportunities by the account management team, since they often require the new sales team to engage in these deals and close them. The team compensation approach means everyone wins, including the customer.
I keep coming back to skills and personalities when structuring your SaaS organization. Keep your teams small and focused. Make sure you have ways for those promising team members, who might start out in tele-marketing or account management, to have a path to progress up the sales food chain. Just make sure that your organization structure is well defined, there are clear rules of engagement and that that compensation plans encourage your sales teams to work together and keep your customers satisfied.
Stay tuned for Tip #3 Test Everything
On a recent client engagement I was asked to provide a simple set of definitions for basic terms and concepts around Software-as-a-Service and Cloud Computing (which I often use inter-changeably). What was interesting is that there is a lot of buzz out there but I can see why people get confused because there isn’t a standard set of definitions.
So my Friday contribution to the SaaS industry I am publishing the Montclair Advisors’ SaaS Glossary of Terms. I would be interested in your feedback on the definitions and if I miss any key ones.
| Term | Definition |
| ACV | Annual Contract Value of a subscription software agreement. |
| API | Application Programming Interface. |
| ARR | Annual Recurring Revenue. |
| ASP | Application Service Provider. Typically associated with a hosted single tenant software solution. |
| CAC | Customer Acquisition Costs. A key -SaaS metric that measures sales effectiveness based on how long it takes to pay back Sales and Marketing investments. |
| Churn | A SaaS measure of customers who do not renew their annual or monthly subscription agreement. |
| Cloud Computing | A utility computing method that shares many types of computer resources through virtualization and delivers an elastic computing environment over the Internet. |
| CLTV | Customer Lifetime Value. A key SaaS metric that is used to measure customer value, usually over 3 to 5 years. |
| CMRR | Contracted Monthly Recurring Revenue. A key SaaS metric that is calculated for new customers, up-sells, cross-sells and removing churning customers. |
| CoLo | Co-Location facility. A term for leasing a third party’s physical data center infrastructure, which usually includes the building, power, Internet connectivity and security. |
| Cross-Sell | A key SaaS metric measuring new software functionality or modules added to an existing software subscription agreement. |
| Down-Sell | A key SaaS metric that measures when customers remove of functionality, users or capability that lowers the CMRR. |
| Freemium | A business model in which the SaaS or Cloud Computing provider offers basic features to users at no cost and charges a premium for supplemental or advanced features. |
| Hosted Software | Single tenant software that is delivered over the Internet from either the Software vendors own data center or through a third party hosting company. |
| IaaS | Infrastructure-as-a-Service refers to a combination of hosting, hardware, provisioning and basic services needed to run a SaaS or Cloud application that is delivered on a pay-as-you-go basis. |
| Mashup | It is a web application that combines data or functionality from two or more external sources to create a new service. The term implies easy, fast integration, frequently using open APIs and data sources to produce results that were not the original reason for producing the raw source data. |
| MRE | Monthly Recurring Expenses. |
| MRR | Monthly Recurring Revenues. |
| MSP | Managed Services Provider. Usually a hosting or CoLo provider who provides a higher level of application management services (App management, monitoring, reporting, billing and call center support). |
| Multi-tenancy | Refers to a software architecture where a single instance of the software runs on a server, serving multiple client organizations (tenants). Multi-tenancy is contrasted with a multi-instance architecture where separate software instances (or hardware systems) are set up for different client organizations. |
| On-Demand | Is often used as an interchangeable term along with SaaS. |
| On-Premise | Traditional method of installing and customizing software on the customer’s own computers that reside inside of their own data center. |
| Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) | Platform-as-a-Service solutions are development platforms for which the development tool itself is hosted in the Cloud and accessed through a browser. With PaaS, developers can build web applications without installing any tools and then they can deploy their applications and services (reporting, integration, security) without any specialized systems administration skills. |
| Private Cloud | Employs Cloud Computing principles within a customer’s own internal networks. The term implies that the same virtualization and highly flexible and scalable methods used in huge Internet-based enterprise datacenters. |
| Public Cloud | Cloud Computing conducted using the public Internet outside of any enterprise firewall. |
| Renewal | Agreeing to extend an existing software subscription agreement beyond the initial term. |
| SLA | Service Level Agreement. The contractual terms of service associated with SaaS provider’s offerings. |
| SOA | Service Oriented Architecture. |
| SaaS | Software-as-a-Service refers to multi-tenant software delivered over the Internet and customers consume the product as a subscription service that is delivered on a pay-as-you-go basis. |
| Subscription | SaaS licensing method where customers rent their software from the provider usually over a 1-3 year period. |
| TCV | Total Contract Value. Total value of a transaction as measured over the term of the agreement. |
| Up-Sell | A key SaaS metric measuring additional software functionality, users, or capacity that is sold onto an existing software subscription agreement. |
| Virtualization | The creation of a virtual (rather than actual) version of an operating system, a server, a storage device or other network resources. |