While walking through the exhibit area of Salesforce.com’s recent Dreamforce event in San Francisco, I was struck by large number of enterprise customers present and the low number of enterprise applications being marketed. I started to think about my experience earlier in the year helping my prior company successfully secure their Series B funding and why the word “enterprise” generates an immediate negative reaction with many venture capital firms when it comes to investing in SaaS providers offering enterprise solutions? When making the venture capital rounds earlier in the year to secure this additional funding, I was surprised by the polarity of views on enterprise applications for SaaS. One group of VC’s defined SaaS applications from a commercial market perspective … high transaction volume, low sales touch and low cost per transaction. To this group, SaaS and enterprise software were mutually exclusive. The other group of VC’s understood the higher costs associated with selling SaaS for complex enterprise requirements and saw the potential rewards. We successfully completed the funding with a group of VC firms in the later group. Their message to us was clear, we believe in the value of your business model but you must lower the cost of acquiring new customers.

The commoditization of SaaS is clearly happening in the small to medium size business market and for some enterprise market companies with relatively simple solution requirements. SaaS solution examples like Intuit’s Quicken Online and their new website building service are examples of the high volume, low sales touch, low customer acquisition cost business model. Some SaaS services offer free trials like Salesforce.com or open source downloads of their applications like Adaptive Planning to help move the prospective buyer cost effectively through the sales cycle. The sales “touch” of this style of selling is typically sending additional information via email, using web seminars and using telesales representatives to close the deal and complete the transaction. For prospective customers who need a straight-forward application that requires little or no professional services assistance for implementation, the cost of customer acquisition can be lowered significantly. It’s very understandable why some VCs only want to invest in the commoditization of SaaS with its high-volume and low-cost of sales. Can the lessons learned in this process of commoditization be applied to SaaS based enterprise solutions targeting companies with complex application needs or implementation requirements?

The answer is yes… and no. Certainly, the days of high touch enterprise style selling in the SaaS marketplace are not over yet but change needs to happen. Enterprise companies with sophisticated business requirements want to evaluate SaaS solutions but need a “high touch” approach to working with the software vendor. This typically involves lengthy requests for proposals, face-to-face meetings with executives, users and IT, customized demos, pilot programs and site visits to the vendor’s data center or reference accounts. I am sure that selling Salesforce.com to Dell or Successfactors to Siemens was not accomplished with just a free trial, web seminar and telesales rep. The challenge is in how to effectively start moving these more complex sales towards a lower customer acquisition cost business model. Here are ten ideas to reduce customer acquisition cost for a SaaS vendor to consider when selling into the enterprise market …

1) Develop, document and articulate a high impact solution methodology that can provide a prospective enterprise market customer with a clear roadmap on how the SaaS application integrates into their business requirements. A solution methodology typically involves documenting how real world business processes map to the SaaS solution and how the SaaS solution can be successfully implemented without the need for extensive consulting.

2) Use web marketing effectively to improve the quality, quantity and impact of information for the enterprise company buyer. Answer the prospect’s questions before they ask them using Flash based graphical displays, testimonials, videos, structured demos, FAQs and case studies. Web based training materials can be very instrumental in helping a company though the evaluation process.

3) Leverage social networking techniques and processes to allow prospective customers to tap into the collective knowledge of your customer base to help them through the purchase process. Of course, this implies that you are maintaining very high levels of customer satisfaction and you can filter information as needed. Suffice to say, there’s an inverse relationship between customer acquisition costs and customer satisfaction.

4) Use web conferencing technology as an alternative to on-site visits. The quality of web conferencing for both audio and video has improved dramatically over the past few years while dropping in cost. Using web conferencing to stage demos for more than one prospect also helps to reduce selling costs.

5) Organize group visits to data centers or training facilities. A large enterprise company that I worked for a few years ago would stage CIO conferences that included a visit to their data center so they could reduce the number of one-off site visits. This also allowed prospective buyers to meet and network with key vendor staff and existing customers.

6) Focus on cutting the cost of lead and opportunity generation. It’s all about conversion rates…. lead to qualified sales opportunity, sales opportunity-to-close. For SaaS-based applications designed for defined markets, target marketing to specific market segments can be much more effective than broad-based marketing to diverse market segments. The velocity of conversions from responses to leads or leads to opportunities has definitely slowed through the course of this recession. Improving the conversion rate from leads to opportunities by using lead scoring and lead nurturing techniques can significantly improve the ROI of marketing programs.

7) If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it. Taking a disciplined approach to using CRM, analytics and marketing automation to measure, monitor and manage sales and marketing results is key to cutting customer acquisition costs. If you don’t know what your pipeline metrics or your customer acquisition costs are, I doubt if you will be able to manage them effectively.

8) Know a duck when you see one, particularly when it comes to enterprise sales. Actively manage the sales cycle and accurately access the reality of each sales situation. Chasing enterprise deals that are not properly qualified will most likely not close and will dramatically increase your customer acquisition cost.

9) Drive your order processing costs down. Make your pricing and contractual models easy to access and understand. Complex pricing and contracts beg for long and costly negotiation cycles. Utilize SaaS focused billing solutions from companies like Dreamforce exhibitor Zuora to help simplify the process and reduce costs. One company that I spoke to at Dreamforce told me that their internal cost to process an individual order exceeded a thousand dollars.

10) Automate as much of the implementation and data integration process as possible, articulate an implementation methodology and make configuration an end user process. This is a significant challenge for SaaS based enterprise solutions because implementations are typically complex and there is a large quantity of data that most be extracted from an in-house system, transformed and loaded into the SaaS solution. Without an efficient process or tool set to simplify implementations, the cost of sales goes up because the sales cycle is extended to explain and build confidence that the prospect’s requirements can be successfully met.

Implementing any number of these ideas will help to lower customer acquisition cost. Years ago, Salesforce.com successfully competed against Siebel Systems in large enterprise accounts by following a number of the ideas mentioned above. They showed that a complex enterprise application could be sold and delivered more cost effectively using SaaS than its licensed based counterpart. Companies like Salesforce.com and Successfactors did not turn their back on enterprise sales with its implicit high customer acquisition costs but instead adapted their sales model to lower customer acquisition costs by leveraging a balanced approach to telesales and field sales, web marketing, social networking and their most important asset… satisfied and successful customers. I doubt that selling a SaaS based application to an enterprise company with complex requirements will ever become a true commodity sale but customer acquisition costs must continue to managed and reduced. As customer acquisition costs are reduced, I am confident that VC community interest in SaaS-based enterprise solutions will soon increase.

This week’s Smart SaaS blogger is Gary Damiano.
He can be reached on LinkedIn or at gedamiano@gmail.com.

When I was learning to drive many, many years ago, I remember my dad telling me to pay attention to not only where the other driver’s eyes were looking but also to where their wheels were pointed. So it was with my search for SaaS at the recent Oracle OpenWorld event in San Francisco. Amid the hundreds of exhibitors and sessions, Cloud Computing in the form of SaaS based applications was being called out, acknowledged and exhibited. There were “campgrounds” of SaaS based applications exhibiting and the normal spread of CRM On Demand sessions. Clearly, Oracle senses the need to position itself as a supporter of Cloud Computing which requires them to encompass and embrace the growing proliferation of SaaS-based services and vendors. Like Levi Straus during the Gold Rush, who made his fortune supplying the miners with clothes and supplies, Oracle has the opportunity to provide the platform and infrastructure that can be a significant enabler in the Cloud Computing story.

But this blog is not about Cloud Computing, it’s about where Oracle is with SaaS-based applications. Certainly, they are continuing their efforts to build out their primary SaaS offering, CRM On Demand with new features and social networking capabilities. There were large banners in the exhibit areas for CRM On Demand and a section of the exhibit hall was dedicated to a few dozen SaaS add-on applications like Helpstream, Adaptive Planning and Eloqua. Oracle’s decision to allow a huge presence for one of their primary SaaS competitors, Salesforce.com, in the west convention hall was interesting. Even more interesting was the opportunity that was provided to Salesforce.com’s CEO, Marc Benioff, to present at an SRO executive session. Marc eloquently thanked Oracle for the opportunity to participate in OracleWorld, talked about the growth of Cloud Computing, their newest offering, Service Cloud 2 and gave away copies of his insightful new book “Behind the Cloud.” In comparison to the exhibits of SaaS vendors and the mega-exhibit of salesforce.com, Oracle’s SaaS offerings had a relatively small presence. No new SaaS offerings for key markets like Human Capital Management or Enterprise Performance Management.

So back to my original point, where is Oracle looking regarding SaaS but also, where are their wheels pointing? Gauging by my OracleWorld observations, Oracle definitely feels the need to acknowledge the proliferation of SaaS-based applications. In my opinion, allowing Salesforce.com to present and exhibit is a huge change in course regarding SaaS. Salesforce.com is Oracle’s biggest competitor in the Customer Relationship Management marketplace but they also are built on top of Oracle database technology. This is not a unique situation in the Oracle world of co-opetition. SAP, their biggest competitor in the enterprise resource management marketplace, is also built on top of Oracle database technology. SaaS is here to stay and though Oracle is not showing any signs of interest in building out its SaaS offerings, it is very interested in ensuring that its database, middleware technologies and possibly its expansive infrastructure are used in the SaaS gold rush. The question of why Oracle is not looking at SaaS as an application delivery vehicle but has its wheels pointed to supporting SaaS vendors and gets into a discussion of Oracle’s business priorities and culture.

Oracle’s business model is heavily dependent on maintenance and support revenue. At 22% of license revenue, this represents a significant portion of Oracle’s revenue and margin. Any significant move away from license sales and to SaaS will disrupt this model and the business culture that has been built upon it. A second factor to Oracle’s delay to move to SaaS-based applications can be found in their sales model. The SaaS sales model is significantly different than the license sales model. SaaS sales typically involve a higher volume of transactions at a lower total contract value. Because SaaS based applications are pay-as-you-go and require limited configuration to be production ready, not only is the software component of the total sale reduced, the consulting component of the total sale is reduced as well. Getting a massive sales organization like the one at Oracle to embrace a SaaS applications focus will be a time consuming, culturally altering and expensive proposition. This is not likely to happen soon.

A more likely strategy for Oracle to pursue if they want to become a leader in SaaS based services would be to focus on the small or medium size business market with a dedicated and independent sales team selling SaaS based applications and not try to convert their existing base of global 2000 enterprise customers. Given the investment by Oracle’s CEO, Larry Ellison, in Netsuite, I am tempted to think of them as an experiment to test a new SMB sales model for Oracle. I suspect that part of the reason that Oracle allowed such a significant presence for Salesforce.com at Oracle OpenWorld is that they do not see them as a significant competitive threat to their installed base and need for them to continue their success to help drive the growing need for platform as a service and infrastructure as a service technology, a market that Oracle is definitely interested in. Of course, Oracle could use their merger and acquisition machine to quickly become the leading provider of SaaS based applications. There are definitely candidates out there other than salesforce.com that could help Oracle accomplish that.

Oracle OpenWorld as usual was an interesting window into the thinking and direction of Oracle. Regardless of the rhetoric that we have heard from Oracle about SaaS, as evidenced by the presence of SaaS on the exhibit floor and Marc Benioff’s presentation, Oracle is positioning to be a player in this market … someway, somehow.

This week’s Smart SaaS blogger is Gary Damiano.
He can be reached on LinkedIn or at gedamiano@gmail.com.

Monday October 12th

It has been several years since I went to my last Oracle User Group meeting, prior to them buying PeopleSoft, Siebel and BEA.  Here are my thoughts around the first day:

The Keynote

Charles Phillips and Safra Catz kicked things off and were helpful in shaping how Oracle is planning on not only rolling out Fusion but also how Sun will fit into their strategy.  Unlike other firms like CA or Infor who just purchase software firms and milk them for the maintenance dollars, Oracle is spending $3B a year on research and development.  They are trying to fit all of these acquired pieces together for their customers, to making them easier to install and purchase.  The analogy of buying a car piece by piece is one that is often used by firms that are looking to provide a tightly integrated ecosystem.  I am not sure if this is really what customers are interested in buying because it really creates a classic vendor ‘lock-in’ scenario.

Larry’s vision is to tightly assemble all the technology components a customer might need; horizontal and industry applications, middleware, databases, infrastructure and, after the Sun deal is approved, they can offer hardware too.  This type of vertically integrated strategy seems to work beautifully for Apple and their consumer-oriented iPhone but will this approach be as widely adopted by Global 2000 organizations with very complex requirements?

The other surprise to me was that there was no announcement of any ‘native’ Oracle Fusion applications. Many of us were hoping that there will be more news about Oracle Fusion application delivery dates, but maybe something will be announced over the next few days.  I believe that when the very smart development people at Oracle started working through the plan to rewrite JD Edwards, Siebel, PeopleSoft, Hyperion, Retek, etc…. Maybe taking a phased approach over 5-10 years might be more realistic than rewriting all the products into a new suite all at once.  That is probably why we saw all of the application ‘mash-up’ demonstrations using Fusion this morning.   This Fusion middleware mashup approach is the near term future for Oracle application customers.

This was only Day One, so stay tuned.

Here are some other general observations from Day One.

Open World Positives

• I was really impressed with the size of the event with more than 35,000 attendees, even in a recession.  The show appeared to be well organized and all of the keynote sessions that I saw were well executed and informative.  So Judy Sim, Oracle’s CMO, should be given a lot credit for her team’s efforts.

• Most of the customers that I interacted with appeared to be interested and engaged.

• The partner pavilion (trade-show) was completely filled out and appeared to be well attended.

• The Oracle Fusion middleware and Oracle Business Intelligence solutions were full featured and had  many new enhancements.  The little 5-minute demos were helpful and gave the audience a quick look at each product.

• I was pleasantly surprised to see the number of global customers and many provided public testimonials.

• I liked the tables (with power-strips) that were set up for analysts and bloggers for all of the Keynote sessions.

After working at Oracle for almost five years in the early 90’s, I can tell you that when Larry sets his mind to something he usually gets it.

Let’s take a trip down memory lane…

It started by just plain beating your competition at sales and marketing.  Remember, crush Ingres, destroy Informix, smash Sybase … they were close to dead and Larry let them slip away.  He would have obliterated DB2 and SQLServer but IBM and Microsoft were too big.  Still he ended up owning the database market.

With the database market securely in his grasp, he started looking to other places where data resided… Ah, applications.   Larry had always said that Oracle didn’t care about applications and that they were focused only on the database market.  Then starting in 2005, he started his assault on the applications market first with Retek, then PeopleSoft, J.D. Edwards, Portal, Siebel and then Hyperion.  SAP is too big to take out and you still need an aspirational competitor anyway.

Humm… if you combine middleware into databases, you probably would sell more databases… then he acquired BEA and Agile.

In September 2008, Larry ranted about “What the Hell is Cloud Computing?”  Then just a few months ago Oracle buys Sun Microsystems and is arguably now one of the leading Cloud Computing providers.  I guess the ‘Network really is the Computer‘.  Now with his new toy Exadata, he is going after Teradata but when he gets his new toys from Sun - Java, MySQL, storage, grid computing, virtualization - he will have a lot of Cloud Computing fun.   It will be interesting to see if Oracle keeps the hardware part of Sun or spins it out to his friends at HP.

So now we come to SaaS.

The battle between mentor and protege.  Marc Benioff, with the help of Larry Ellison, has done a phenomenal job launching the leading Software-as-a-Service firm, Salesforce.com and creating the entire SaaS industry.  At Oracle’s earnings call last week Larry claimed that although Salesforce.com is the largest SaaS firm at $1 billion annual run rate, and Oracle is now the second largest SaaS provider at an $750 million annual run rate.  This included some high profile wins for their CRM on-demand offering last quarter including NetApps, McAfee, Land O’Lakes and Conoco.   But I can imagine that Salesforce.com won their unfair share of the on-demand CRM deals last quarter.

Oracle Fusion finally arrives.

What I found interesting is that the new Oracle Fusion suite of applications is now code complete and in beta.  This means it will be available from an Oracle sales rep near you in the fall. Oracle Fusion is on-demand ready and will offer three delivery models; traditional On-Premise, SaaS and then there is On-Premise SaaS.   On-premise SaaS, is that like military intelligence? This is usually and incredibly bad idea unless you are a $23 billion dollar company that generates more than $5 billion in profits.  The new Oracle SaaS suite will all ERP modules including CRM and HCM applications focused mainly on F1000 sized organizations.

Even though Fusion might be a positive development for the Oracle On-Demand sales team, it is doubtful this will be enough to enable Oracle to control the SaaS market organically.   So look for Oracle do what they have always done when they want to control a market, buy their way to the top.  That would mean that some Oracle alumni’s like Marc Benioff or NetSuite’s (Larry and his family own a majority of Netsuite) Zack Nelson will probably be on Uncle Larry’s radar screen.  This is just like other Oracle alumni’s Craig Conway from Peoplesoft - who is also on the board of directors of Salesforce.com and Tom Siebel were pursued.

I guess in the end if you can’t beat’em, join’em.

Looks like someone is assuming an attack formation … the end of 2009 should be very interesting for the ever-evolving SaaS market landscape.