The buying habits of software buyers over the past couple of years has really shifted. The way software was sold in the recent past was by promoting its revenue-producing benefits or the Return On Investment (ROI). This changed when the Great Recession hit the broader software market and buyers started thinking less about ROI and more about reducing or controlling their overall operational costs.
Between 2008-2009 this was a natural reaction by most businesses because their revenues began to dry up and they needed to reduce costs, payrolls and other investments in order to survive. This was when SaaS all of sudden made a lot of sense to software buyers because:
During this period of time most SaaS companies sold their products based solely on their Total Cost of Ownership or TCO benefits. It was possible to make a strong case around shifting the software buyer’s costs from their capital budgets to their operating budgets, and this was attractive since most businesses were focused on conserving their cash. This is why leading SaaS firms like Salesforce.com and SuccessFactors enjoyed very strong Compound Annual Growth Rates, usually in excess of 40%, even during the depths of the Great Recession.
With Dreamforce ‘11 coming up later this month, I thought it might be interesting to do a quick review of what I am seeing in the market around the Force.com initiative. Salesforce has been one of the early proponents of using a Platform-as-a-Service or PaaS solution in building out your SaaS business. I believe that the Force.com platform offers new and existing ISV’s several real value propositions:
Pay-as-you-go pricing model. This is really helpful to small companies just getting started and Salesforce will allow the customers to tie their their revenues to the royalty fees for the platform.
Packaged platform. The platform contains everything from a development kit, database, configurable UI, reporting and the hosting infrastructure, all for one price. In addition to the price advantages it is just the streamlining of vendor relationships by getting all of your technology from a single supplier.
Elastic scalability. Because Force.com is built on the Salesforce infrastructure, it can scale up and down to meet the needs of high transaction or even periodic type applications. This is a very nice feature that makes true multi-tenant Cloud Computing infrastructures so cost efficient to operate.
For a company that is new to the Cloud and looking to launch a SaaS business quickly, Force is a great way to start. Based on some of my discussions with clients and other ISVs, here are some of the real and perceived challenges associated with Force.com and other PaaS solutions.
Lock-in. Most companies tell me that having a PaaS package is attractive but they don’t like putting all of their technology needs in the hands of a single provider.
Development environment. For many companies who are used to coding in Java or other languages, the Apex 4GL language is not very appealing to hard core developers. It also doesn’t offer enough flexibility for certain types of applications.
Complexity. Companies who offer complex enterprise applications that require robust rules and calculation engines, workflow, integration or are offering other types of deep infrastructure solutions, find that Force is not a good match for their requirements.
Even with these potential drawbacks, there are many companies who are building their SaaS businesses on top of the Force platform. Here is my short list of some of the more well know firms:
FinancialForce. The company is a joint venture between Salesforce.com and Unit4, a Dutch ERP firm. FinancialForce offers both financial and professional services applications.
RemedyForce. Developed by BMC Software and Salesforce.com, it is based on the popular Remedy ITIL and help desk product.
AgileVision. This is CA Technologies Agile development tool based on Force.com.
ServiceMax. Independent company that is offering a Cloud-based Field Service Management solution. The company just landed a Series B round of funding for $14M.
JobScience. Offers a talent relationship management suite on top of Force.com.
Veeva Systems. Offers CRM and regulated content management solutions.
BasicGov. Delivers a suite of applications designed for the needs of state and local governments.
CyberU. Cloud-based learning management system.
Less Software. Provides a light-weight supply chain management software product.
Other traditional software firms, or Hybrids, and even some SaaS firms are using the Force.com platform to extend their existing products and solutions. Some of these companies include:
Montclair Advisors did a SaaS business profile in April 2009 and recently participated in the company’s SuccessConnect 2011 in San Francisco, where we were able to hear from key members of their management team about recent news and a business update.
SuccessFactors had changed their focus about two years to be corporate performance management focused. Darryl Dickens their new chief marketing officer announced that although Business X is still the core positioning, they wanted to reach back out to the HR buyer. Their new tag line is now more HR friendly; ‘It’s time to love work again.’ (… and by the way, I like the new branding).
With the new branding SuccessFactors wanted to re-focus their messaging around being a proven, visionary Cloud-brand for HR and business performance solutions. This new branding means there is a new logo, website, and icon system.
Part of the strategy behind the re-branding has to do with the new products and capabilities now available across the SuccessFactors product portfolio including collaboration (CubeTree), learning (Plateau and Jambok), reporting and analytics (YouCalc and Infohrm) and HRMS like Employee Central. The new brand is a laminate designed to put a logical wrapper around the suite, which can help to rationalize product bundles, pricing and packaging.
As customers have grown more comfortable with the Cloud, those who have older versions of PeopleSoft are now looking for alternative options for their core HR systems, and that is where Employee Central fits in. The Employee Central solution has been built for the BizX suite to integrate talent management, analytics, collaboration as well as employee services. Employee Central 2.0 was made GA in March 2011.
Most talent management providers have shied away from offering a system of HR system of record. SuccessFactors sees a real opportunity to integrate their offerings as well as a potentially large market for new Cloud-based HRIS offerings. As Workday offers not only core HR solutions but also talent management applications, both of these firms are chasing a growing replacement market in the SMB and enterprise markets.
Employee Central offers a basic system of record but stops short of a full HR and payroll system. SuccessFactors has decided to partner for payroll with Patersons, Ceridian and Meta4.
The biggest news was that SuccessFactors purchased SaaS-based talent management provider Plateau Systems in April 2011 for $290 million in cash and stock. This was the largest acquisition to-date for SuccessFactors and marked the first time that the company had purchased a talent management application instead of an add-on technology. Plateau has a large and satisfied customer-base of both commercial and federal accounts.
Doug Dennerline, SuccessFactors new president (ex-Salesforce.com) was very clear that they were planning on getting very close to Plateau’s customers and assure them that they will allow them to do what makes the most sense for their businesses. Unlike the other learning-related acquisition, Jambok, Plateau offered an enterprise-class Learning Management System with a world-class customer-base. Plateau not only adds revenues and customers but also provides an interesting SaaS architecture and platform that SuccessFactors may be able to leverage to service their their very largest customers.
With this business combination, SuccessFactors is now one of the largest HCM SaaS providers based on total revenues, customers and numbers of users. After all of these acquisitions, it is clear that the company now has many different growth engines moving into 2012. Based on our briefing with the very seasoned SuccessFactors management team, it will be interesting to see how they are able to integrate all of these offerings and manage all of these potential business opportunities.
Montclair Advisors had done a SaaS business profile of Patersons in April 2010 and we wanted to get an update from their new CEO, Andrew Pearson. Andrew was brought into the company shortly after our profile was completed and came from SaaS collaboration provider IntraLinks where he was the Managing Director of EMEA.
With the change in management, the company has re-focused its strategy primarily around providing a robust global payroll software and services platform. This has been the company’s strength over time and they felt that this approach would open up some new ways to partner with the leading SaaS Talent Management and HCM providers if they weren’t also offering competitive products. Patersons solutions tend to be a very agile and can fit into any organization’s environment based on their infrastructure requirements. In addition, to their software platform Patersons will continue to offer customers a managed services option for their payroll processing needs.
The big news was Paterson’s new partnership with Workday and how they were planning on supporting several of their larger customers who were looking for global payroll capability. Workday is focusing more on building out their financials platform in the near term and less on extending their payroll solutions, so partnering with Patersons for their Logon2 global payroll platform makes a lot of sense. The plan is to offer Workday customers not only their HCM and Talent Management solutions but also an integrated global payroll solution that allows the customer to turn off competitive payroll solutions over time. Often these types of companies may have many different payroll providers by the countries or regions that they are doing business in and by consolidating onto a single platform over time, this approach can deliver value on many different levels. This partnership was announced in January 2011.
The other big announcement that occurred after my interview with Andrew was that SuccessFactors had formed a similar partnership with Patersons’ for global payroll. Patersons will join the SuccessFactors’ partner program as a Strategic SuccessCloud Partner to provide complementary global payroll services to SuccessFactors’ multi-national customer base. The Patersons product will also be integrated into SuccessFactors’ Employee Central product, which will allow customers to streamline their payroll administration especially for multi-national operations.
This re-focused strategy has been working with the company experiencing strong growth in excess of 40% annual growth and currently support more than 160 countries. Patersons today is concentrating on offering core ‘gross-to-net’ capabilities to 15 countries and will continue to expand their payroll platform out to up to 50 high GDP states and regions over the next few years. The only other software firm that has this level of cover is SAP but they aren’t going to SaaS anytime in the near future.
The future vision for Patersons is to offer their customers and partners a fully integrated global solution that allows large firms control over their payroll, ability to comply with governmental regulations as well as to reduce the cost of administration. For many of their target customers, who have grown through M&A, they have multiple vendors and a lot of technology, this level of complexity is driving up costs, and Patersons can help to streamline their payroll processes using both software and managed services.
The re-focusing of the Patersons’ strategy to primarily offer a SaaS-based global payroll platform appears to be gaining momentum and it appears that they are a company to watch here in the second half of 2011.
I was going to write this post earlier in the week but it seemed that everywhere I turned I saw more developments and wanted to include them. The market is really starting to get frothy and there are many big SaaS/Cloud deals happening and companies going public with very large market caps. Let’s take a look:
SuccessFactors (NASDAQ: SFSF) Acquires Plateau Systems for $290M, which was paid in half cash and half in stock. This is an interesting move since it is the first acquisition that could be considered ‘core’ functionality when compared with other acquisitions like CubeTree (Collaboration), YouCalc (Analytics), Inform (Analytics) and Jambok (eLearning). Plateau also has a fairly significant product portfolio overlap including compensation, performance management and succession planning, so it should be interesting to see how these offerings are consolidated.
Plateau has a very respectable customer-base with a large number of federal government customers as well as many large enterprise customers. The company also was profitable and has some interesting Platform-as-a-Service capabilities that should be very useful for a larger SaaS portfolio.
Based on the market basket of publicly traded SaaS firms, this deal will make SuccessFactors the second largest firm in the group based on current revenues. We estimate that at their current quarterly run-rate of $68M and Plateau’s estimated annual revenues, the combined company now is probably around $340M, which is only second to Salesforce.com.

CenturyLink (NASDAQ: CTL) Buys Savvis (NASDAQ: SVVS) for $2.5B, which is now third largest telecommunications company in the US with $18B in annual revenues. The company had purchased Qwest earlier in the year and that deal was finalized on April 1st. Now with the acquisition of Savvis, CenturyLink is moving into the Cloud Computing market with more than 48 data centers globally.
This is the second major deal in the Cloud Computing market of an emerging Infrastructure-as-a-Service provider, when Verizon purchased Terremark for $1.4B in January. This should stimulate further consolidation of other providers and Rackspace may be the next target.
![]()
Salesforce.com (NASDAQ: CRM) Picks Up Radian6 for $326M for the Canadian social media monitoring company. Radian6 helps their customers monitor ‘hundreds of millions’ of social media conversations. Salesforce believes that the acquisition will enable it to enhance all of its products, including Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, Chatter and Force.com.
![]()
Infor and Golden Gate Capital Buys Lawson Software for $2B. Now this is technically not a SaaS or Cloud related deal but it just is another example of the pressure traditional providers are feeling from the up and coming SaaS and Cloud providers like Netsuite, Workday and even Oracle’s new Fusion offerings.
![]()
Cornerstone OnDemand (NADSAQ: CSOD) went public on March 16th and quickly captured a market cap of $800M, even when the company lost more than $45M. The company offers a suite of Talent Management solutions similar to what is offered by SuccessFactors and Taleo.
ServiceSource International (NASDAQ: SREV) completed their IPO on March 25th and were valued at more than $800M as well. ServiceSource helps companies manage their revenue streams from renewals, maintenance and subscription agreements, which is especially important for SaaS firms.
![]()
Responsys (NASDAQ: MKTG) was able to launch into the public markets on April 21st and got a very respectable market value of $2.4B. The company offers SaaS-based software and services that help retailers and eCommerce firms build and manage online campaigns.
With Cornerstone OnDemand’s recent IPO (NASDAQ: CSOD) and their high valuation based on a negative EBIDTA, many are starting to ask if we are headed for a second Internet or SaaS Bubble?
I do agree that some of the valuations at this point are a lot higher than a reasonable person would expect, but this is probably just pent up interest in the technology sector. It doesn’t help that Facebook and LinkedIn has seriously pumped up the valuations for Internet/Social Media firms, but today’s SaaS companies are very different from the Dot Bombs of 1999/2000.
Remember these companies?
|
Company |
Business |
Market Cap (000’s) |
|
On-line Groceries |
$1,200 |
|
|
On-line Pet Supplies |
$ 325 |
|
|
Marketing |
$5,400 |
|
|
Delivery Services |
Private |
All of these companies were built on bad business models, too much money and expectations that were out of control. And by the way are all out of business.
But not all of the Internet companies that were formed during this period were bombs; in fact there are a number of firms that are now pillars of the technology industry including these firms:
|
Company |
Founded |
Business |
Ticker |
Market Cap (000’s) |
|
1994 |
eCommerce |
$76,380 |
||
|
1996 |
eProcurment |
$ 3,140 |
||
|
1995 |
eCommerce |
$39,370 |
||
|
1995 |
Communications |
$ 1,340 |
||
|
1997 |
eCommerce |
$23,790 |
||
|
1996 |
Health Content |
$ 3,150 |
It would be safe to say that each of these companies struggled during and after the Dot-Com collapse but they were able to modify their models to take advantage of the efficiencies that the Internet provided. Amazon has built a business that can effectively compete against the largest retailer in the world, Walmart, even though its sales are only 1/12th their revenues.
All of these Internet Survivors had to develop a real business model that would deliver solid margins, profits and growth. They each had to assemble experienced management teams, learn how to deliver superior customer service and build trusted brands. Not easy to do, but they did it.
Fast-forward to today and we have a whole new set of Internet and Software-as-a-Service companies that have emerged and gone public including these firms:
|
Company |
Founded |
Business |
Ticker |
Market Cap (000’s) |
|
1997 |
$ 1,560 |
|||
|
1997 |
Education |
$ 1,280 |
||
|
1993 |
Travel & Expense |
$ 2,960 |
||
|
1999 |
Talent Mgmt |
$ 855 |
||
|
1995 |
Marketing |
$ 1,000 |
||
|
1998 |
Search, PaaS |
$187,000 |
||
|
1987 |
Talent Mgmt |
$ 622 |
||
|
1998 |
ERP |
$ 1,880 |
||
|
1997 |
CRM |
$ 1,030 |
||
|
1999 |
CRM, PaaS |
$16,930 |
||
|
Servicesource (2) |
1999 |
Service Mgmt |
$ 774 |
|
|
2001 |
Talent Mgmt |
$ 2,990 |
||
|
1996 |
Talent Mgmt |
$ 1,430 |
||
|
1990 |
Payroll |
$ 1,490 |
||
|
1992 |
Marketing |
$ 478 |
As you can see most of these companies were founded before the Internet Bubble burst and were forced to create real business models that could deliver profits.
At Montclair Advisors, we specialize in SaaS business advisory services and we know many of these firms quite well and they all have strong management teams, growing businesses and staying power. Unlike the Internet firms that went IPO in 1999 or 2000, most of these firms have had to build up their businesses over ten or more years and are based on some form of recurring revenues.
Major differences between the companies on this list versus the early Dot Bomb firms include:
So are the valuations of companies like Cornerstone OnDemand and Servicesource, Facebook and LinkedIn too high? Are we beginning to see a SaaS Bubble? Maybe, but all of these companies have been built for the long term and will be around long after any correction, unlike their early Internet cousins Web Van or Kozmo.com.
Company: Merced Systems
Started: 2001
Located: Redwood Shores, California
Geography: North America
Market: Sales and Service Performance Management solutions
Products: Merced Performance Suite, Merced ICM, Merced Intelligence and Merced Express Products
Key Customers: Sprint, T-Mobile, Dell, Delta Airlines, Discover Financial Services, Dish Networks, ING Direct, Kaiser Permanente and OnStar.
Website: Merced Systems
Blog: Performance Matters
Twitter: @mercedsystems
Recent News:
Merced Systems Awarded Patent for Temporal Specificity
Merced Systems to Host Sixth Annual Customer Summit for Sales and Service Industry Leaders
Merced Systems Achieves Eight Consecutive Years of Growth and Profitability
I asked Harold Goldberg Merced Systems’ Chief Marketing Officer about his business and his view of the SaaS market for 2011.
Why did Merced launch a Software-as-a-Service business?
We started in 2002 and launched our first private cloud offering. At that time we typically sold to the business user, who in turn had to work with IT to get their approval. Our customers liked our SaaS-based approach, since they could have an expert manage their software on-line, and that expert is Merced.
This service started with just a single company and it has just grown organically over time by just listening to our customers about what they needed.
A few years ago we started to expand this offering and launched our SaaS service with subscription payment plans with users paying a fixed fee per month for access to our products. Most of our initial customers signed up for a 2-year subscription and then they could add more years and users to the contract when they were ready. We know that most of our large customers tend to move a lot of people around inside their organization and like to have a fixed price for our services because it provides them with a predictable way to plan for their costs in the future.
We have seen the use of our SaaS model in a variety of different ways including one customer, who wanted to do a pilot using the SaaS product because they wanted to get into production quickly, then they bought out the subscription and converted to a license and had us managed their solution in our data center.
Merced will usually lead with our SaaS offering but will also offer managed services or perpetual options when that meets our customer’s needs. We find that it all depends on the organization and their resources and capacity to manage another enterprise application.
Customers like our flexibility because they can have it their way and today we are definitely seeing more customers who are interested in SaaS and Private Cloud solutions.
Why is moving to SaaS important for Merced?
Because we sell to large enterprise customers, it has been important to be able to start with an initial sale to a department then spread out across the customer’s organization over time. This is an important part of the SaaS business model. We can get our customers a product to get started with easily and then demonstrate a real ROI, and rapid time-to-value because our products can be turned on relatively quickly compared to their on-premise alternatives.
Most sales and services organizations are looking for ways to the costs associated with internal operations. Our customers look at our ROI as an important driver over the long term. In the near term they are looking for improved performance around sales and services effectiveness, which usually translates into increased revenue production. Our products help by delivering better compensation plans, process visibility, coaching and the result is that reps and agents become more effective, and our customers usually see between a 20-40% productivity increase with the use of our products. Our SaaS products just help us to get our products into the customer’s hands much faster than a traditional on-premise deployment model.
Another value of SaaS is that it provides transparency for our customers as well as their partners. Our customers want to see real business value and since our products are specifically designed for front-line workers, and everyone is focused on making these employees more productive, a monthly investment in Merced translates into visible performance improvements and higher revenues. The SaaS solution allows them to pay monthly and renew and expand their footprint based on real business results.
I think the last reason is around our financial model. Our SaaS and managed services solutions provide a predictable revenue stream that is valued by our management and investors. Because SaaS revenues are recurring it allows us to more accurately forecast revenues and tie them back our expenses in development, support, sales and marketing. Over time this has become a real win-win for the company.
What lessons have you learned in building your SaaS business?
Actually our SaaS model looks a lot like some of the insurance companies I have worked with in the past. Company revenues are based on building a book of business and compensation plans are built on top of customer retention, cross-selling and up-selling new products, so the model is familiar to me.
A couple of the lessons we have learned over time are that we can deliver value much faster to our customers using the SaaS model. Since we are managing their technical environment, it is possible for us to take lessons learned and apply best practices and how we manage our software much faster than our customers could. This also applies to the entire service delivery process including support, because they can see the customer’s entire environment.In fact we can get in front of issues before they happen. This helps build high customer satisfaction with our customers, which is why we have a 98%+ renewal rate.
Because we manage our customer’s technical environment, it also makes it more efficient to migrate customers from an on-premise version to our SaaS version and even makes our regular SaaS implementations go faster and smoother.
As I mentioned earlier, our customers like the flexibility of our product delivery options. Many customers will start with a departmental pilot using our SaaS offering. Another division might want their version of Merced in their own data center and we can then link those versions to create a hybrid solution to meet our customer’s needs. We think this is the real promise of the Cloud, to be able to integrate our SaaS products with our customers existing and new on-premise systems, which makes us unique.

Company: FrontRange Solutions
Started: 2000
Located: Pleasanton, California
Geography: Global
Products: Help Desk, IT Service Management, IT Asset Management, Customer Service, CRM, Voice and SaaS2.
Geography: Advanstar Communications, Amercian Stock Exchange, Chicago White Sox, City of Des Moines, Instron Corporation, SHI and Swisscom
Website: FrontRange Website
Blog: FrontRange Blog
Twitter: @FrontRange
Recent News:
FrontRange Solutions Announces New ITSM SaaS Solution
FrontRange Solutions delivers much anticipated IT Service Management Enterprise
FrontRange Solutions Announces Release of new Service Catalog Solution
I asked Kevin Smith, FrontRange’s vice president of marketing a few questions about his newly launched SaaS business and his view on the market going into 2011.
Why did you launch a Software-as-a-Service business?
Even as a large, profitable on-premise software company, about five years ago we saw a growing demand in the market for SaaS-based service management and help desk solutions. We knew from our experience that just hosting our existing products like some of our competitors had done in an ASP-type of solution wasn’t a viable strategy. It also wasn’t what customers wanted.
So we decided about three years ago to build a new product that was a pure multi-tenant solution and we have invested millions of dollars to create our new ITSM SaaS solution. When we looked at our version of SaaS, we think of it more as Solutions-as-a-Service that is included in our SaaSIT family of solutions including service desk, asset management and customer service.
What lessons have you learned in building your SaaS business?
One of the main lessons we learned was that our customers still want on-premise solutions, especially companies vertical industries such as healthcare, government and financial services.
Customers we have talked to want a hybrid model, with a single provider. They want their divisions and headquarters to be able to use either on-premise or SaaS, based on their needs, but be able to exchange information between both types of products. We believe it is possible to have world-class products across both on-premise and SaaS. FrontRange will continue to invest in both product lines and create distinct product roadmaps but also look for synergies.
We understand that SaaS is a different business model, including different products, customer service, sales, services and even training. FrontRange used a tiger team approach where we brought in key talent who understood SaaS processes in development, operations and other areas. The idea was to infuse the company with some SaaS DNA in a few important areas, and we will build up this expertise over time. We are also using partners to help us with our SaaS offerings including Amazon Web Services’ EC2 hosting infrastructure.
Interestingly we have seen a halo effect with our existing on-premise customers as a result of having a SaaS product strategy. For instance we have customers who have been using our HEAT product for many years, and had a corporate mandate to look at SaaS, so when they learned about our SaaS strategy it just reinforced their desire to stay on product maintenance. This was attractive for existing customers using our on-premise products because they liked the future opportunity to mix and match both delivery options. Our pipeline for new customers also contains many hybrid deals where companies want both on-premise and SaaS offerings.
We were also fortunate that our company was able to fund the build-out of our SaaSIT product suite from our normal operating income and cash over the past three years and were even still able to remain profitable.
The SaaSIT product felt like it took a long time to develop, and at it was a difficult process, but we are now excited to have a truly competitive SaaS service offering to sell.
It is always hard to predict the future, but here are my 10 Predictions for the SaaS market in 2011, and they might just happen:
A number of large consumer subscription software players including Facebook, Groupon, LinkedIn, Zynga and Skype could really open up the public markets with a major blockbuster IPO (or IPO’s) in 2011. SaaS firms that look to get everyone’s attention with potential IPO’s next year include Cornerstone OnDemand, Workday, Marketo, Service-Now and possibly Plateau.
So my prediction (which is a pure guess) is that SuccessFactors and Taleo finally get over their respective CEO ego issues and decide to merge. Sounds a little crazy, but when you really consider their product portfolios, there might not be as much of an overlap as you might think. SuccessFactors is basically a performance and analytics company and Taleo is a recruiting and learning (after acquiring Learn.com) company. They both have some additional components that could be plugged into to create a more comprehensive suite of CPM and Talent Management offerings.
This would also create a combined company with a market cap approaching (SFSF + TLEO) $4B and annual revenues in excess of $400M, which would be the second largest SaaS firm in the market, and a clear leader in their space. Another potential marriage might be Concur and Ultimate Software.
It seems like most Oracle SaaS rumors involve the acquisition of Salesforce.com, and that may happen some day, but the more likely combination for 2011 is NetSuite. Larry Ellison is a major investor in NetSuite (early investor) and own/controls more that 50% of the company’s shares. He may come to the conclusion that he needs some real SaaS DNA inside of Oracle to help grow their Fusion business in 2011 and beyond.
Similar to the realization that many other major traditional ISV’s will come to in 2011, that they are too far beyond in SaaS to catch up organically, SAP will buy their way into SaaS. The Business ByDesign project for SAP, by some estimates, has cost more than $1 billion and there isn’t much to show for it. I always thought that the Sybase acquisition was just a smoke screen to cover up how little progress has been made with BBD at their most recent Sapphire user meeting. Like Oracle, I think SAP reaches out into the market and purchases a SaaS firm to jump start BBD. RightNow would be an interesting choice since SAP wants to make a splash in the CRM market.
These big software companies are no longer just paying lip service to SaaS or the Cloud, they continue to catch up with the subscription software market transition that is happening everywhere. All sizes of customers who were battered during the recession are no longer interested in spending a lot of capital and time that has been associated with traditional software projects and are becoming increasing comfortable with SaaS. This shift in the Software market is massive and is going to take at least 10 years, and we are probably only in the second year (post-recession) of this shift. Continue to look to see what SaaS moves firms like Oracle, SAP, HP, CA and Infor make in 2011.
Look at Salesforce.com’s recent moves to expand their Force.com Platform-as-a-Service portfolio with VMForce and then buying Ruby on Rails provider Heroku for over $200 million. Beyond Force.com there are many other offerings here today and coming in 2011 including App Engine by Google, Apprenda, Azure by Microsoft, Corent, Engine Yard, Facebook, Flex by Adobe, Fusion by Oracle, Intalio, IPP by Intuit, LongJump, Nimbula, SuiteCloud by NetSuite, and Wolf Frameworks.
As long as traditional ISV’s continue to move towards SaaS, there will be a green field opportunity for all types of PaaS solutions. Look for several of these firms to be acquired in 2011 by larger ISV’s.
After attending Dreamforce this month, it was curious to see a number of Force.com firms offering ERP extensions starting to gain real market momentum. Companies like FinancialForce.com (they purchased Appirio’s PSE business) who are delivering a growing suite of financial and accounting applications, JobScience who continue to build out their Talent Relationship Management suite on Force.com, Less Software who is selling a targeted Supply Chain Management solution and even Remedy’s Service Desk offering, RemedyForce Cloud. If Salesforce offers an attractive exit for any of these firms or their Force.com products, like they did with Heroku, then it might be possible to do a quick roll-up of key partners to create a competitive Cloud-based ERP solution.
Interestingly this type of move might be triggered by Oracle buying Netsuite or Workday going public.
Although Private Clouds might be a viable alternative for enterprises who are looking to leverage the economics of the Cloud, for software companies this type of approach will only provide short term ‘Fake SaaS‘ types of solutions. This type of business model of hosting single-tenant software was known as Application Service Providers (ASP’s) and none of these companies that emerged about 10 years ago were able to find a business model that really scaled profitably. Private Clouds will offer a short term technology transition steps for software companies who are moving away from just offering traditional on-premise software but this trend will really start to fade by later next year.
At Dreamforce ‘10 Salesforce.com announced that they are launching their new Database.com offering, a Database in the Cloud. What was interesting about this news is that Salesforce is really just reselling a private-label version of Oracle’s database technology. For Salesforce this is a unique way to take proven Oracle software, designed for on-premise deployment, and create a true subscription-based version of this product. No doubt that Salesforce will need to do some work to create a massive multi-tenant version of an ORACLE database and then deliver it as a service, but they are already doing this today through their Force.com platform. This could be a significant new revenue stream for both companies and look for other SaaS firms to try OEM’ing their software as a way to improve their CAGRs in 2011.
This should be an interesting year as the economy improves and the SaaS market really begins to gain some serious momentum. It should be a fun time to be in the Software business again.
Kevin Dobbs, Montclair Advisors, LLC
By Kevin Dobbs
The last few months have been quite active in the SaaS market and here are some things that caught my attention:
Who would have believed that we would be seeing Initial Public Offerings after our recent recession but new offerings include SciQuest (NASDAQ: SQI), Qlik Technologies (NASDAQ: QLIK), Ancestory.com (NASDAQ: ACOM) and Financial Engines (NASDAQ: FNGN). There are a number of upcoming IPO’s including Talent Management provider Cornerstone OnDemand.