Depending on who you listen to, things are either recovering slowly, or we are slipping back into a recession. It can be argued that for most software companies, if you are selling a SaaS-based solution then it shouldn’t affect your business very much. In fact, as the economy gets tighter for buyers, SaaS solutions even make more sense for forward thinking businesses who are focusing on innovation and cost controls.

During the Great Recession we saw that traditional software companies experienced a net decline in their revenues and in some cases their revenues went down by nearly 50% year-over-year between 2008-2010. In big part this was because traditional software customers no longer had available the necessary capital dollars to spend on their perpetual license-based products and the banks were no longer lending.

These traditional software companies had also hastened their revenue decline by raising their annual maintenance rates, which put more pricing pressure on their customers at a time when they could least afford it. So their customers started taking a hard look at SaaS solutions as potential alternatives to traditional on-premise software.

Recession Accelerates SaaS Adoption

It wasn’t that SaaS solutions hadn’t been around for many years, it was that for many large software buyers, they hadn’t felt comfortable with software that was being managed by another companies. There were a lot of questions: Where was their data being housed, was it safe, what if they can’t handle our requirements? These were legitimate questions but many SaaS value propositions began to win over these large, skeptical customers:

• You could try their software before you buy it
• Get can get this software up and running quickly
• Only buy the functionality that you need
• If you don’t like their software, for any reason, cancel your subscription
• The software’s performance and availability is guaranteed
• Pay though a subscription, a big lump sum payment is not required
• No more upgrades, this type of software is always current
• Less or even no staff required to manage their software
• Lower total cost of ownership

These types of on-line solutions started resonating not only with the small and medium-sized company buyer but also with the very large, global enterprises as well. Over the last couple of years we have seen well-known organizations like Siemens, Walmart, Flextronics, Thomson Reuters and even the US government adopt SaaS and Cloud-based solutions.

It’s About Innovation Not Reducing Costs

Businesses during the last recession were primarily trying to reduce costs, which resulted in large scale layoffs. These firms were trying to ‘do more with less’.  This was the reason that many of these companies continued to buy software because they not only wanted to streamline operations, but also they needed to continue to innovate their business.

By deploying the latest in software technology, these innovative companies are looking to move into new markets, provide state-of-the-art tools to their employees, and optimize their supply chains.   This required them to get smarter about their businesses, markets and competitors, and solutions like SaaS-based business intelligence products were also really in high demand.  Given the flexibility and affordability of SaaS products compared to their on-premise predecessors, it is no wonder that most SaaS companies grew at more than 30% year-over-year even during the worst part of the recession.

There are SaaS solutions for almost every enterprise need including ERP, Financials, CRM, Marketing, Human Resources, Talent Management and even specific specialized vertical solutions.  Click on this link to access Montclair Advisors Public SaaS Index to see which firms offer leading SaaS solutions.

In the next 12-18 months we may be either headed for very slow growth in the economy or even another recession, but SaaS companies will continue to grow quickly because most companies are still looking for ways to lower their total cost of operations and improve their ability to innovate and increase their overall competitiveness.  As long as SaaS providers continue to deliver on their Cloud-based value propositions, they will experience rapid growth even if the economy continues to be tight throughout 2012.

by Kevin Dobbs

Montclair Advisors, LLC

When advising software clients who are interested in moving to a SaaS business model, one of the areas I really dig into is how are they selling to new customers. Most of us in the SaaS community realize that carefully tracking your Customer Acquisition Costs or CAC, is a critical component in building a successful and profitable company, but I think it is equally important to understand how traditional software sales  and marketing models and SaaS models differ.

Traditional Software Sales & Marketing Model

Over the past 25 years there has been a traditional way to market and sell enterprise software which has been based on key principles such as:

• You need a Large direct sales force including a large support team, or as I used to call them, ‘The Cast of Thousands‘
• Front loaded compensation plans that pay out when deals are sold
  
• High average sales prices, including services, that would almost always be over $500,000
• Long sales cycles, usually 6-12 months, with pursuit costs averaging around $70,000 for every deal the company played in
• Win rates are in the 30-50% range
• Average face-to-face selling time that is around 15%
• Pipeline building using a combination of in-person events (seminars, tradeshows, user group meetings), telemarketing teams (inbound and cold calling) pounding the phones and a lot of paid marketing campaigns
• Lead pipelines that appeared full but always seemed to lack the appropriate level of qualified opportunities
• First generation CRM systems and reports that were produced periodically using Excel

Brings back the good ol’ days doesn’t it.  Many software firms are still using this model and they are finding out that it doesn’t work very well in the new world of Software-as-a-Service sales.  Some of the reasons it doesn’t work is that software buyer preferences are definitely changing, but one big issue is it is very expensive to operate this type of model, especially when you get your revenues paid out over time.

SaaS Sales & Marketing Model

There are several important differences in the SaaS model that make the traditional software sales and marketing model less than effective;

• SaaS customers pay a subscription based on users or usage of the software service over time, usually over three years.  After the recession, this has become the new normal for software sales
• More focused solutions that usually have Average Sales Prices that are typically lower, so reps need to sell more deals to hit the same quota targets
• Key metrics like customer satisfaction, renewals, up-selling and cross selling are even more important for SaaS than they were in the past
• Sales method is more of a “penetrate and radiate” approach
• It takes a long time to build up a recurring revenue stream

Given these differences, then what should your SaaS Sales & Marketing model look like?  Here are some ideas to consider when building out your SaaS sales and marketing plans for 2011 that can help you to build out a low-cost but high-efficiency sales and marketing machine;

Marketing

• Hire experienced marketing leadership and professional
• Evolve a good list of key influencers and industry contact and communicate with them frequently
• Develop a clean prospect database
• Mix paid and free social networking programs
• Build a vibrant customer community and market to them with products like Lithium
• Leverage social media like LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter to generate interest and leads
• Use Web 2.0 marketing tools like Marketo, Eloqua, Pardot and try drip marketing
• Track everything (see the last Smart SaaS post)

Sales

• Hire experienced SaaS sales leadership and reps
• Your SaaS sales team should be more low touch than your traditional sales team
• Experiment with telesales even with high end enterprise products
• See is using an indirect channel makes sense for your business, if managed correctly these distribution partnerships can dramatically lower your sales costs
• Carefully track your lead hand off between marketing and sales, make sure leads are not falling through the cracks
• Track everything

Metrics like Customer Acquisition Costs and the Magic Number can help your sales and marketing teams see how effective their programs are and can provide insight when to invest and when to continue developing your repeatable sales model.  I would also encourage you to learn more about Mark Leslie’s Sales Learning Curve, because it offers a more scientific approach to cost-effectively building out your SaaS sales team.   Best-in-class firms that have profiled in this blog have adopted many of these techniques to build a scalable but cost-careful sales and marketing organizations.

Stay tuned for Tip #6 Package for Viral Adoption

Continue reading…