At Montclair Advisors I work with many different types and sizes of software firms that are jumping into the SaaS business model for the first time.   Here are a few tips that I would tell a new client who is looking to get into the SaaS business in 2012.

Think “Whole Product”

A SaaS offering is more than just software, it is also the services to get the product up and running, training, support, the infrastructure and security.

For most SaaS firms, they really view their platform as synonymous with their company’s overall brand, which includes more than just the technology. This brand promise is a product experience that is smooth and consistent. It also takes into account issues like business continuity and being able to quickly restore systems and data after an outage. This also means that SaaS offerings must understand and how to properly manage security and compliance concerns for large, complex customers.  In some cases this promise needs to do a high level of monitoring and even anticipate and correct problems before they occur.

When considering the professional service component of a SaaS offering, there should be extra focus on efficient provisioning and on-boarding of new customers. It is important to make this initial experience quick and easy in order to improve the customer’s overall time-to-value. By combining many customer-facing functions like support, training and service into a Customer Success team is also another popular way of trying to deliver a positive ‘whole’ product experience.

Focus on Adoption and Consumption

The economics of SaaS requires both a high rate of new customer sales combined with a better than 90% renewal rate for the financial model to work. The trick that the really fast growing SaaS firms have discovered is that up-selling additional capacity and cross-selling new products not only increases top line revenues but also improves overall Customer Acquisition Costs (CAC) and business margins.

The objective in any software company should always be to build a satisfied customer-base, but in the SaaS model you can’t stop there, it is important get customers to actively use and adoption the product. When a product is easy-to-use, intuitive, being used every day, and built on a solid platform, then it can become viral. Viral products like DropBox, Yammer and Salesforce.com’s Chatter can throw off high marginal add-on sales, that can boost a SaaS company’s revenues very quickly. This type of product consumption is important for all SaaS company’s even if the use of their product may never go viral.

It’s All About Growth

Many new SaaS firms spend a lot of time and capital building out their products, which makes sense. Often they underestimate the amount of effort and focus required to build a high growth sales and marketing machine. Because it is hard initially to jump start the recurring revenue model, it is important to develop a highly productive sales methodology, usually based on a ‘land and expand’ approach. For the most successful SaaS companies (SuccessFactors, Salesforce.com, Workday), an aggressive Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) is imperative to building a profitable company.  Many of these firms, even though they are large, are still growing at 30-50% per year.

In order to build this sales and marketing engine, it requires a meaningful investment in lead generation, a sales organization that separates hunters from farmers and has a set of metrics that are tracked at least weekly. For ISV’s that are moving to a SaaS model, don’t co-mingle the SaaS and non-SaaS sales teams. Each sales team should be very focused on selling a single type of product or a single function. For example, having a SaaS team that focuses on selling only new SaaS deals, another is only doing renewals or up-selling.

Because products and markets are different, it is important to constantly be testing lead generation, pricing, packaging and sales processes in order to find the best one that works for your business. If something doesn’t work, stop doing it, and pivot to another idea. The best SaaS companies are always testing and trying to improve their revenue generation processes.

Optimize Cost of Goods Sold

Most SaaS executives are focused on their COGS and how best to optimize them. This is why many early SaaS firms use free open source software and Infrastructure-as-a-Service providers to build out their platforms, or outsource components of their business to partners to save money. The best way to optimize COGS is to reduce the number of people required to on-board, provision and operate your SaaS platform. It is better to automate as many of your processes as possible, which not only saves precious capital, but also can often improve the overall scalability of the business.

One the best examples of this type of automation is with the popular commercial SaaS storage solution DropBox [Check out this video]. They have built a service that is easy to use, self-provisioning and needs no human intervention. This is why they were able to on-board 40 million new customers during the last 12 months with a net increase of only 7 people across their entire company! This is where SaaS companies can become very profitable and grow very quickly.

Another area that can really impact COGS is related to the 30-day trials associated with most SaaS software. Without a scalable platform that has a sufficient level of automation, the launching, management, tear down and re-provisioning of resources will all be done by an ever growing team of professional services or IT professionals. Best practice is to leverage a multi-tenant platform and automate everything possible.

Strive for Independence

For ISV’s who are either transitioning to or launching a new SaaS offering, it is important to seriously consider keeping the new SaaS organization separate from the main business. I have seen many ‘shared service’ models where different groups share sales, operations, demand generation, services and even support and they experience a lot of challenges. The SaaS business model in many ways is unique and conflicts with most traditional software business practices.

For example, professional services in most software companies is a revenue-center and they are always looking for ways to generate additional projects and revenue. At a SaaS company, the professional services team is doing the opposite.  A SaaS services team is trying to minimize their level of involvement with the customer, and the less services involved in setting up a SaaS product, the better. This would be a difficult group to manage if you have both a revenue quota and are also trying to minimize revenue associated with SaaS accounts.

The other reason I often recommend creating an independent group for transitioning ISV’s is that the overall rate and pace of SaaS companies is quite different than traditional software firms. SaaS firms develop products more quickly, sales processes are faster, deployments are more rapid and this mismatch in speed creates a lot of stress when traditional ISVs try to adopt this rate and pace.

It is also important to continue the care and feeding of the core business and realize that is also a critical success factor. By allowing this type of co-existence you can move at the right rate and pace, while continuing to build and run your core business.

There are many other tips and tricks to starting your SaaS business.  Feel free to email me at kevin@montclairadvisors.com and I have some other materials that can be helpful for those who are new to the SaaS model.

As it turned out I was right about 50% of my predictions last year, so here’s my educated guesses for what is going to happen to the SaaS market in 2012:

#10  Oracle will buy Netsuite.

I know this isn’t much of a surprise since Larry Ellison owns approximately 65% of Netsuite, but with the RightNow acquisition, this type of move makes more sense as part of coordinated Cloud acquisition strategy.

#9  SaaS IPO window remains open.

There are a number of SaaS firms who have either filed, like Eloqua, or are seriously considering going public in 2012, like Workday, Dropbox, Box, and Guidewire.  This window can be opened even wider by successful IPO’s from companies like Yelp and Facebook.  The only problem is that there are over 100 companies who have already filed to go public in 2012, so it might be difficult for smaller SaaS firms to do their IPO.

#8. Master brands will continue to chase SaaS offerings.

IBM just purchased DemandTec and SAP bought SuccessFactors, while Oracle bought RightNow.  This is a big change from 2010 when most of these companies were not interested in the Cloud or SaaS.  All of these master brands have tried to build their own SaaS businesses, but I think they have now finally realized that SaaS is a business model, not just new technology.  The smart firms will keep their SaaS businesses and their core license businesses separate and not try and merge them.  Good luck.

#7. Workday will have a monster IPO.

There is no doubt that the 2012 IPO of Facebook will set all sorts of records but for enterprise software, I think Workday will be one of the biggest on record.  The company just took in $85 million in funding over the past few months, in what was termed an IPO preview round. Workday could raise as much as $500 million in an IPO, which would force the big ERP players to start building out their SaaS businesses as a defensive strategy at the bare minimum.

#6. SaaS starts to go global.

I was involved in an Oracle SaaS webinar a couple of weeks ago for an audience in Europe and the response was really impressive.  I initially thought that most of the registrants would be from the UK, the Netherlands, Germany and Scandinavia.  Actually there were attendees from almost every country in Europe.  I have also started to hear about strong SaaS interest in Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, Japan, China and many other countries.  2012 will just continue to build on the SaaS market’s growing global momentum.

#5. Salesforce continues to expand beyond CRM.

During 2011 Salesforce purchased several firms that added new capabilities to their platform including DimDim (collaboration), Radian6 (social analytics), Model Metrics (mobility) and then they bought Rypple in December, which launched them into the Human Capital market.  I predict that Salesforce will add several other HCM tuck-in acquisitions (JobScience, Jobvite), financial applications (FinancialForce, Zuora), or even supply chain management (Glovia OM, Kenandy).

#4. IT Management and Security SaaS offerings emerge.

Companies like CA have been successful in launching their new Nimsoft ITM SaaS offering during 2011, but there are also many other firms that are beginning to gain momentum with their new SaaS offerings as well. This is a very big market opportunity to replace existing legacy infrastructure and security offerings. Companies to watch include Service-Now, Trustwave, Splunk, PingIdentity and Proofpoint.

(Note: CA/Nimsoft and PingIdentity are Montclair Advisors clients)

#3. SaaS continues to be social.

With Jive going public during December 2011, they are just the most recent example of SaaS social applications gaining market acceptance.  Salesforce has been very successful with their Chatter and Radian6 offerings.  Independents like Yammer, SocialCast, Lithium and CentralDesktop will continue to see increased demand for their social/collaboration platforms.

#2. More big VC rounds for SaaS firms.

2012 will continue to see VC’s put a lot of money to work with leading SaaS companies.  We saw some major investments during 2011 including Box ($81 million), Dropbox ($250 million), HubSpot ($32 million), Marketo ($50 million), Workday ($85 million) and Zuora ($35 million).  This trend will continue in 2012 and companies will be putting a lot of money to work to build out their platforms and distribution capabilities.

#1. Storage is a major story for 2012.

As more and more data is stored in the Cloud, consumers and businesses are looking to all different types of on-line storage services.  During the year that Apple launched its iCloud small business and music storage service, we also saw major funding rounds for SaaS companies including Dropbox and Box.  We even saw a new IPO from Carbonite that provides a small business/consumer Cloud back-up service.  This is definitely a segment of the SaaS market to keep an eye on in 2012.

Over the past few months SaaS companies have continued to announce very large funding rounds as they are demonstrating the power of their subscription-based business platforms. Many of these firms are deciding to do large private rounds before filing to go public. Here is a quick round-up of some of these firms:

The company has raised an amazing series B round of $250 million. Dropbox is the Cloud storage company that is very popular with mobile phone and iPad users. They have about 70 employees and have secured more than 40 million customers in the past 12 months. This round put the company’s market valuation at close to $4 billion. This is probably the largest B round we have seen and may have been done as an alternative to doing an IPO.  Sounds like a Facebook type of story because like Mark Zuckerberg turned down a significant acquisition offer from Google, and apparently the DropBox founders, Drew Houston and Arash Ferdowsi, turned down a nine-figure offer from Apple in 2009.

Workday or “PeopleSoft 2.0″, has been making consistent progress towards a 2012 IPO and announced at their recent Workday Rising conference in October that they had just closed an $85 million dollar round of funding. Like Dropbox, Workday has now raised about $250 million. With this lastest round, the company is now valued at $2 billion. What was interesting is that unlike most private fundings, which are usually led by venture capital firms, this round was lead almost exclusively by institutional investors like T. Rowe Price, Morgan Stanley, Janus and Fidelity. As co-CEO Aneel Bhusri put it “In some ways, it’s an early debut of an IPO.” Workday claims they are on track to do about $320 bookings during 2011, which is more than 100% CAGR from 2010.

Another major Cloud storage company, Box.net, resisted a $600 million dollar offer from Citrix and just closed an $81 million round with Bessemer Venture Partners, NEA, Salesforce.com and SAP and existing investors Draper Fisher Jurvetson and Andreesen Horowitz. After this round the company’s valuation is $600 million. The company has about 7 million users and is leveraging a very successful ‘freemium’ go-to-market model.

With competitor Eloqua already in IPO registration to raise $100 million for their Revenue Performance Management (RPM) platform business, Marketo isn’t far behind. The company announced last week that they had just raised another $50 million in a round led by Battery Ventures along with Institutional Venture Partners, InterWest, Mayfield Fund and Storm Ventures. Marketo’s estimated size of around $15 million in in 2010, should double in 2011, but they are probably a little small to do an IPO at this point. Obviously the venture community thinks this RPM area around marketing and revenue optimization for SaaS is quite hot right now.

As part of their IPO registration, Jive Software just raised another $40 million prior to their public offering. Sequoia Capital and Kleiner Perkins Caulfield & Byers purchased stock through preferred warrants. Jive is provides an enterprise social business platform. Currently the company is on a $80 million run-rate but still not profitable and has raised close to $100 million overall.

Enterprise subscription commerce and billing provider Zuora also announced a large round of funding last week. The company raised a Series D round of $35 million from Index Ventures, Greylock along with a personal investment from Workday co-CEO Dave Duffield and their existing investors. To date the company has now raised $82 million. Zuora plans to use these funds to aggressively expand their distribution activities internationally, specifically in Europe.

The common thread for all of these companies is that they have businesses that are growing rapidly and have built very scalable platforms. With the IPO window open, but the public markets are still uncertain, we will probably see more of these type of IPO-preview type of funding announcements as SaaS firms continue to gain momentum in the market.

Workday 13 Update

Workday provided a preview of the latest product update, Workday 13 at the end of April.  This appeared to be a major release of functionality across their entire ERP suite including Workday HCM, Workday Payroll, Workday Initiatives (Work Management), Workday Financial Management, Workday Spend Management as well as some new user experience capabilities.

This was the first update we have received in about two years so it was really impressive to see how much progress the company has made not only with their products but also with their overall business.  Here are some key facts:

• 200 customers and more than 130 of them are live
• Flextronics have over 100,000 employees using their systems
• Over 1,000,0000 employees are using their various products across their customer base
• Targeting an IPO for the second half of 2012
• Releasing about 3 updates per year, compared to 1 every 18+ months for their ERP competitors

Workday HCM

As I mentioned, the last time I saw a Workday product demonstration, they didn’t very much in the way of talent management functionality but that has really changed. They now have compensation planning, performance management, succession planning and competency management.  They have wrapped these capabilities in a robust in-line analytics and decision support framework.  This framework includes pre-packaged reports and some really slick user interfaces for workforce management.  This screen shot is of their 9-box interface for their succession planning product.  What I thought was really cool is how they have integrated their position management and organization charting capabilities right into this 9-box interface for their Talent Matrix.  These capabilities look very competitive to most of the other leading SaaS TMS players in the market.

For capabilities that they don’t currently have in the their talent management products like recruitment they will continue to partner with leading specialists like StepStone (now Lumesse) who acquired MrTed and Taleo.

For learning management they have built an intelligent interface into Plateau (recently acquired by SuccessFactors).

When they demonstrated the Workday 13 product, the one thing that popped out at me was the user experience and how engaging it was.  The user interface appeared to quite flexible, allowing the user to drill down, or across to access important information, as well as the use of compelling charts, graphs and dashboards.  I thought it was interesting to see how an object oriented architecture can really impact the overall usability of your SaaS products.

Workday Payroll

For an ERP system it is very useful to provide a payroll solution to tie into.  Workday’s product has been built from the ground up to be a SaaS-based payroll solution.  Workday Payroll was launched in 2009 and supports US based payroll requirements.  The news for Workday Payroll is a new partnership with OneSource VHR for payroll co-sourcing services such as payroll settlement, tax and garnishment administration.  These are common requirements for organizations with very large workforces.

Workday 13 still offers integrations into third-party payroll providers and payroll aggregators such as Patersons and ADP.

Workday Mobility

Seems like every HR software company is now offering a mobile application for users.  The news in this area was the announcement of limited availability of Workday for the iPad.  Again, one of Workday’s strengths is user interface design and this product is no exception.  The product is not intended for heavy transactional use but more for the executive or manager that wants to easily browse through talent profiles, monitor their Chatter-like personal Workday Workfeed or gain insight into their workforce by running a report or analytics.   The general availability for Workday for iPad is planned for Workday 14.

Overall, I thought that the Workday 13 release contained some useful improvements and the product is really impressive.  Given their 3 times a year release cycle, they will continue to innovate at a brisk pace which will be difficult for the traditional ERP competitors to keep up with.  Also, their laser focus on usability will also become a huge differentiator when looking at incumbent solutions, as long as Workday can deliver the necessary functionality and security that enterprises are going to continue to demand.

Mercer HR Outsourcing and Consulting Briefing

Mercer provided an update on their HR outsourcing, talent management and consulting products and services for 2011. Mercer is a major player in the overall Human Capital Management and Health and Benefits markets with total revenues at $3.5 billion, 27,000 customers, and over 4 million employees using their solutions. Here is a quick take on some of the interesting things that they are up to.

Mercer Outsourcing

Mercer’s global outsourcing leadership provided an update on their business that includes their Total Benefits and point solutions outsourcing offerings. The company has made an important shift from the broader HRO market to focus more on their strength around Total Benefits Outsourcing or TBO. Mercer’s outsourcing clients make up 80% of the US Fortune 500, so they are very strong at the high-end of the market.

In a recent announcement Mercer is now partnering with SAP in Germany for their pension administration. This partnership will allow SAP to deliver a robust pension solution to their large German and multi-national customers including organizations like Dow, Rockwood Holdings and J.P Morgan.

Mercer has made a major investment in building out a very high quality offshore processing center in India, their Global Operations and Shared Services center over the past 2-3 years. The key to making this offshore capability work is that Mercer isn’t just outsourcing benefits work to a partner, the GOSS employees are Mercer employees and part of their core delivery teams. Today this service center handles only back office and delivery functions, at a much lower cost than could be achieved from US-based resources. This positions the company to offer lower cost TBO solutions to mid-market sized organizations. Mercer also doesn’t offshore their call center or employee-facing functions to India at this time, due to possible concerns from their customers, these functions are still handled by US employees.

Mercer’s Americas operations provided an overview of their business which is primarily based on their TBO platform. Mercer’s Health and Benefits business capabilities include defined contribution, defined benefits, health and benefits and absence management. Their TBO business typically services clients with at least 7,500 employees and more than 80% of their new clients are leaving existing benefits engagements with other industry providers. Unlike competitors, Mercer’s Americas TBO business has very high customer retention rates, in excess of 95%.

Human Capital Connect

Recently launched their integrated Performance and Rewards solution built on top of PeopleclickAuthoria’s SaaS-based talent management platform. This solution has been infused with Mercer’s rewards best practices as well as a link to their ePRISM compensation management technology. Mercer clients and prospects like the idea of leveraging the company’s extensive embedded intellectual capital, integrated into a leading a TMS SaaS platform to help them deliver faster and better HR transformations.

The initial uptake on the offering has been a little slower than they planned but are now seeing stronger momentum and should be able to announce some new wins in the second half of this year.

Mercer WIN

Mercer’s Information Products team previewed their upcoming product called the Workforce Information Network that is a new rewards analytics platform that accesses Mercer’s vast warehouse of compensation and job family information. Mercer has compiled comprehensive data from more than 20 million employees and 8,000 organizations globally.

The Mercer WIN offering is now in beta, with 50 charter clients, and the company is planning to expand the offering to service up to 10,000 users by the end of 2011. The plan for 2012 is to broaden the available data sources to include survey data from other providers along with other Mercer data, that will them to deliver libraries of benchmarks for pricing, reporting and survey submissions. These tools will allow their clients to deliver more competitive pay programs segmented by regions and against their peer groups. Over time this data can be shared among other Mercer offerings including ePRISM and with the Human Capital Connect product set.

This potentially is a very interesting subscription service based on a large data asset that Mercer has been sitting on, that could be made available to all of the company’s clients over the next few years.

As part of Montclair Advisors‘ SaaS strategy work with several of our clients over the past couple of years, we have learned quite a bit about the specific requirements for large and small manufacturers who are evaluating SaaS-based ERP and MRP solutions.   For many reasons, the manufacturing community has been slow to respond to the SaaS and Cloud Computing revolution.  One of the main reasons we found was that because many small factories operate in low-cost regions of our country or the world, many don’t have reliable access to the Internet, which would render SaaS solutions useless.  But things are now changing and there are a whole new set of SaaS-based ERP solutions emerging on the market.

We were pleased to review a recent blog post by Derek Singleton at Software Advice, where he does a very good job of reviewing some of the latest ERP products that have made the move to the Cloud including Epicor, Infor, NetSuite, Plex and SAP Business ByDesign.

It is a great read.

Enjoy.

Kevin

Manufacturing software vendors are making aggressive moves to the cloud. In the past year alone, four vendors rolled out full suite Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) offerings for the industry. That brings the current tally of full-suite SaaS players in the manufacturing arena to five: Epicor Express, Infor SyteLine, NetSuite, Plex, and SAP Business ByDesign.

The buzz around the cloud has manufacturers asking if a cloud solution is right for them. To help answer that question, I’ll explore the features and functionality each vendor offers, and the ideal target market for each. Many more vendors are redesigning their software for the cloud, but I thought I would spotlight the five that are already there.

First, here’s a brief introduction to the vendors.

In May of 2010, Epicor released Epicor Manufacturing Express Edition (Epicor Express), the SaaS version of their Epicor 9 product. Their SaaS offering was designed specifically with smaller job shops and manufacturers in mind. Currently, 70 of Epicor’s 9,500 manufacturing clients are working in the cloud on Epicor Express. The product is currently targeting a 20 to 30 day period to go live. That should be attainable for small job shops without complex data migration needs.

Infor moved their flagship SyteLine product to the cloud in October of 2010. Of their 70,000 customers, mostly manufacturers, 800 have put some of their solutions in the cloud. Infor takes pride in the flexibility of their .NET architecture and their ability to serve mixed-mode manufacturers. In future releases, Infor plans to expand multi-site capabilities, and expand their mobile applications.

NetSuite began pursuing light assembly and less complex discrete manufacturing customers in 2007. In June of 2010, they launched their first full-suite manufacturing offering to target mid-market manufacturers. As a pure SaaS company, NetSuite’s manufacturing clients all operate in the cloud. NetSuite currently supports multiple sites, multiple languages and currencies. In future releases, they plan to expand upon this functionality and target more complex manufacturing industries.

Plex was the first SaaS player to target the manufacturing industry with their 2001 cloud-computing debut of Plex Online. At their start, Plex targeted the automotive industry. Since then, the company has expanded into several other verticals. As a pure SaaS vendor, all of Plex’s 589 manufacturing clients are in the cloud. Future releases will focus on expanding global capabilities, and developing functionality for more vertical manufacturing markets.

The July 2010 release of Business ByDesign 2.5 marked the on-premise ERP powerhouse’s first SaaS move into the manufacturing market. The product hosts 250 customers, but we don’t have a detailed count for how many customers are manufacturers. Regardless, SAP has tremendous manufacturing domain expertise to incorporate into the product over time. In future releases, SAP will focus on expanding their functionality to cover mixed-mode manufacturing and engineer-to-order.

Read the rest of the post… click here.

It is always hard to predict the future, but here are my 10 Predictions for the SaaS market in 2011, and they might just happen:

Blockbuster Subscription Software IPO’s

A number of large consumer subscription software players including Facebook, Groupon, LinkedIn, Zynga and Skype could really open up the public markets with a major blockbuster IPO (or IPO’s) in 2011.  SaaS firms that look to get everyone’s attention with potential IPO’s next year include Cornerstone OnDemand, Workday, Marketo, Service-Now and possibly Plateau.

Major Players Merge to Form the Next Big SaaS Brand

So my prediction (which is a pure guess) is that SuccessFactors and Taleo finally get over their respective CEO ego issues and decide to merge.   Sounds a little crazy, but when you really consider their product portfolios, there might not be as much of an overlap as you might think.  SuccessFactors is basically a performance and analytics company and Taleo is a recruiting and learning (after acquiring Learn.com) company.  They both have some additional components that could be plugged into to create a more comprehensive suite of CPM and Talent Management offerings.

This would also create a combined company with a market cap approaching (SFSF + TLEO) $4B and annual revenues in excess of $400M, which would be the second largest SaaS firm in the market, and a clear leader in their space.  Another potential marriage might be Concur and Ultimate Software.

Oracle Finally Pulls the Trigger on NetSuite

It seems like most Oracle SaaS rumors involve the acquisition of Salesforce.com, and that may happen some day, but the more likely combination for 2011 is NetSuite.  Larry Ellison is a major investor in NetSuite (early investor) and own/controls more that 50% of the company’s shares.  He may come to the conclusion that he needs some real SaaS DNA inside of Oracle to help grow their Fusion business in 2011 and beyond.

SAP Throws in The Towel and Buys Leading SaaS Player

Similar to the realization that many other major traditional ISV’s will come to in 2011, that they are too far beyond in SaaS to catch up organically, SAP will buy their way into SaaS.  The Business ByDesign project for SAP, by some estimates, has cost more than $1 billion and there isn’t much to show for it.  I always thought that the Sybase acquisition was just a smoke screen to cover up how little progress has been made with BBD at their most recent Sapphire user meeting.   Like Oracle, I think SAP reaches out into the market and purchases a SaaS firm to jump start BBD.  RightNow would be an interesting choice since SAP wants to make a splash in the CRM market.

Master Brands Continue to March Towards SaaS

These big software companies are no longer just paying lip service to SaaS or the Cloud, they continue to catch up with the subscription software market transition that is happening everywhere.  All sizes of customers who were battered during the recession are no longer interested in spending a lot of capital and time that has been associated with traditional software projects and are becoming increasing comfortable with SaaS.  This shift in the Software market is massive and is going to take at least 10 years, and we are probably only in the second year (post-recession) of this shift.  Continue to look to see what SaaS moves firms like Oracle, SAP, HP, CA and Infor make in 2011.

Continued Explosion of PaaS offerings

Look at Salesforce.com’s recent moves to expand their Force.com Platform-as-a-Service portfolio with VMForce and then buying Ruby on Rails provider Heroku for over $200 million.  Beyond Force.com there are many other offerings here today and coming in 2011 including App Engine by Google, Apprenda, Azure by Microsoft, Corent, Engine Yard, Facebook, Flex by Adobe, Fusion by Oracle, Intalio, IPP by Intuit, LongJump, Nimbula, SuiteCloud by NetSuite, and Wolf Frameworks.

As long as traditional ISV’s continue to move towards SaaS, there will be a green field opportunity for all types of PaaS solutions. Look for several of these firms to be acquired in 2011 by larger ISV’s.

Salesforce.com Continues to Expand Beyond CRM

After attending Dreamforce this month, it was curious to see a number of Force.com firms offering ERP extensions starting to gain real market momentum. Companies like FinancialForce.com (they purchased Appirio’s PSE business) who are delivering a growing suite of financial and accounting applications, JobScience who continue to build out their Talent Relationship Management suite on Force.com, Less Software who is selling a targeted Supply Chain Management solution and even Remedy’s Service Desk offering, RemedyForce Cloud.   If Salesforce offers an attractive exit for any of these firms or their Force.com products, like they did with Heroku, then it might be possible to do a quick roll-up of key partners to create a competitive Cloud-based ERP solution.

Interestingly this type of move might be triggered by Oracle buying Netsuite or Workday going public.

Fake SaaS Firms That Use Private Clouds Will Loose Altitude

Although Private Clouds might be a viable alternative for enterprises who are looking to leverage the economics of the Cloud, for software companies this type of approach will only provide short term ‘Fake SaaS‘ types of solutions.  This type of business model of hosting single-tenant software was known as Application Service Providers (ASP’s) and none of these companies that emerged about 10 years ago were able to find a business model that really scaled profitably.   Private Clouds will offer a short term technology transition steps for software companies who are moving away from just offering traditional on-premise software but this trend will really start to fade by later next year.

New Revenue Streams for SaaS Firms That OEM

At Dreamforce ‘10 Salesforce.com announced that they are launching their new Database.com offering, a Database in the Cloud. What was interesting about this news is that Salesforce is really just reselling a private-label version of Oracle’s database technology.  For Salesforce this is a unique way to take proven Oracle software, designed for on-premise deployment, and create a true subscription-based version of this product.  No doubt that Salesforce will need to do some work to create a massive multi-tenant version of an ORACLE database and then deliver it as a service, but they are already doing this today through their Force.com platform.  This could be a significant new revenue stream for both companies and look for other SaaS firms to try OEM’ing their software as a way to improve their CAGRs in 2011.

This should be an interesting year as the economy improves and the SaaS market really begins to gain some serious momentum.  It should be a fun time to be in the Software business again.

Kevin Dobbs,  Montclair Advisors, LLC

By Kevin Dobbs

Montclair Advisors, LLC

One of the questions that I get quite often from firms that are starting down the path towards selling SaaS solutions, ‘should we use the same sales team to sell both our on-premise and SaaS solutions?‘ It seems like this would be easy and you should be able to definitely leverage your existing sales team to penetrate not only prospective accounts but also with existing customers.

No one wants to re-invent or re-invest in building out a new SaaS-specific sales team but this is critical to building out a successful SaaS business.  What many executives overlook is that SaaS is not just a delivery model but it is really a truly different business model.  I thought it might be helpful to use this table to illustrate those business model differences and why creating a specialized sales team is necessary.

Let’s review some of these important differences in each sales approach and how it affects the typical software sales rep:

Value Proposition: Traditional software is sold to solve a targeted business requirement and then customized to meet the specific needs of a customer.

SaaS takes a different approach.  It is usually sold with the promise of lower costs, more rapid time-to-value and ease of use.  This is accomplished using a standard system and configuration that is not tailored or customized for each customer. These are two very different value propositions and would be hard to expect every sales rep to be able to master both sales strategies.  Keep in mind that these two value propositions also appeal to two very different buyers; business buyers and IT.

Procurement:  Similiar to the value proposition, positioning the value of of a subscription purchase versus the actual purchasing of a software license are quite different.   After the recession, and part of our new normal economy, most organizations are now leading with a the requirement of subscribing to software instead owning it.  This allows customers to keep their more cash on their balance sheets and longer term, save on hiring staff to manage their internal systems inside of their own data centers.

Sales Cycles: Customers are also looking for just enough software to get the job done and are not usually looking to purchase a lifetime’s worth of functionality anymore.  They want to purchase a small piece of functionality now and then grow their relationship with their software provider over time, once they know the software works and they are comfortable with this relationship.  This means that SaaS sales cycles are going to be much shorter than traditional, on-premise software sales transactions.

Transaction Sizes:  Because of the different buying behaviors associated with SaaS from traditional software, SaaS transactions tend to be much smaller.  This means that a SaaS sales rep is going to need to close more deals, more frequently in order to make the same quota target that a perpetual license sales rep is assigned.

Pricing:  Putting together proposals are always difficult, but asking a sales rep, or even sales management, to offer both license and subscription options is really complex.  I think this is also not a great idea because it ultimately confuses the customer, since they will try and normalize the pricing for both options, which is hard to do.  Comparing a SaaS solution to an on-premise perpetual license is like comparing apples to oranges, and your sales team needs to pick one of these solutions and really learn how to sell it.

Methodologies/Touch:  Best-in-class SaaS sales organizations is a laser focus on Customer Acquisition Costs (CAC).  Living with the reality that the majority of your revenues will come in over the life of any contract, it is imperative to keep your sales costs low.  A SaaS model doesn’t lend itself to using the high-touch sales model, or engaging the ‘cast of thousands‘, to come in and get deals done.  Most SaaS firms operate a lower-touch model using tele-sales, remote demonstrations, and many automated self-service tools to assist the sales team in getting deals done quickly.

Channels: Effective use of indirect channels is another way of lowering customer acquisition costs.  Although some traditional software companies use channel partners to sell their products, it appears that the use of channels is really gaining popularity among SaaS providers.  Many SaaS firms are complimenting not only their tele-sales capablities but also using partners to deliver value-added services as well.

Demos:  Another way of reducing the cost of sales is to be more selective and smart about how customers are exposed to a software providers’ solutions.  This is usually accomplished by showing the software either using a Web-based conferencing service or some type of self-service environment.   This is quite a different approach than what was done with on-premise software, which was done in person and using a highly scripted demo.

Trials:  In the past, if a customer wanted to get their hands on the software and really use it, the only way that can be accomplished was with a Professional Services team and a conference room pilot.  Most SaaS companies allow prospective customers to play with their products by offering them a 30-day trial, after a simple self-service sign up and a quick tutorial.  This automated approach is cost effective and allows a SaaS firm to manage potentially hundreds of product trials with very little support personnel required, and this is a great source of qualified leads.

Renewals & Customer Relationships: This is another contrast between the two models. In a traditional software company the customer relationship is usually dispersed among various functions including Sales, Support and possibly Professional Services.  In SaaS firms the customer relationship and the renewal process are both very important, and usually have clear ownership, usually with the Account Management organization.

When you consider all of the differences in these two approaches to selling traditional software and software as a service, it is not reasonable to have the same reps trying to master selling both options.  The best sales reps are always focused on selling, hitting quota, and earning commissions.  Sales reps will sell what they are comfortable with and when considering a SaaS transition, it is best to create separate teams, with one that can specialize in the SaaS value proposition, solution, sales methodology and can make money on the SaaS-specific comp plan.

When firms make it simple for their reps to sell, you will get the sales momentum you are looking for in all of your lines of business.  You don’t want your sales reps to be the ‘jacks of all trades and masters of none‘, because that isn’t the formula for SaaS sales success.

By Kevin Dobbs

The last few months have been quite active in the SaaS market and here are some things that caught my attention:

• Who would have believed that we would be seeing Initial Public Offerings after our recent recession but new offerings include SciQuest (NASDAQ: SQI), Qlik Technologies (NASDAQ: QLIK), Ancestory.com (NASDAQ: ACOM) and Financial Engines (NASDAQ: FNGN).  There are a number of upcoming IPO’s including Talent Management provider Cornerstone OnDemand.

• You can tell the SaaS and Software markets continue to gain momentum based on the number of M&A deals over the past 90 days including Oracle buying Art Technology Group, hardware company Dell purchased SaaS integration firm Boomi, Deltek buys government market research firm INPUT, talent management leader SuccessFactors buys analytics firm Youcalc, Taleo purchasing Learn.com for $125M, recruiting firm Kenexa acquired Salary.com and even PE-owned SumTotal Systems buying Softscape.

• Firms that are making good progress in their SaaS transitions include Callidus (NASDAQ: CALD) and Plateau Systems.

• Software companies who seem to be having more trouble with their current subscription and license models include Concur (NASDAQ: CNQR), MicroStrategy (NASDAQ: MSTR), Manhattan Associates (NASDAQ: MANH), and SAP (NYSE: SAP).

• The Venture community continues to fund SaaS and Cloud Computing firms, several who have been profiled by this blog have received funding in the last six months (congrats!) internet billing firm Zuora lands $20M, Cloud management platform RightScale grabbed $25M, multi-tenancy Cloud platform firm Nimbula raises $15M, marketing automation provider Marketo, Bill.com, social platform provider Jive Software raises $30M, Gooddata and Cloud9 Analytics.

• SaaS, Software and Cloud Computing firms have also made some interesting management changes over the past few months including; ex-Oracle president Charles Phillips (video) moved over to become the new CEO at Infor, Taleo lands a new CFO former Palm executive Douglas Jefferies, Saba has added a SaaS-experienced CMO Karen Steele, SuccessFactors brings in seasoned President from Salesforce.com - Doug Dennerline, PeopleclickAuthoria Chairman Charles Jones returns as CEO to run company and well-respected analyst Ray Wang joins Constellation Research.

By Kevin Dobbs

Montclair Advisors, LLC

When thinking about your transition to SaaS, there are many questions to consider including target customers, value propositions, packaging, pricing and how best to build customer relationships.

After conducting more than 50 Smart SaaS business profiles of all different types including pure SaaS, Hybrids and Cross-Overs, all of these companies would probably answer many of these types of questions differently depending on their type of customer, functionality, geography, vertical markets and the only way they can get useful answers is to continually test everything.   Best in class SaaS firms are always trying different pricing, packages, messages in order to optimize their businesses, like a recent firm we profiled - Clarizen.

Some resources when thinking about these types of considerations include:

Software Pricing Partners - Jim Geisman

Chaotic Flow - Joel York

SaaS Blogs

Sixteen Ventures - Lincoln Murphy

4 Pillars of SaaS - Phil Wainewright, ZDNet

In addition to testing, it is a good idea to measure everything including website traffic, marketing campaigns, product usage, customer satisfaction and a myriad of other SaaS and business metrics.  Again, the best firms track and monitor all the key business metrics in order to improve their ability to generate revenues, build market share and reduce unnecessary customer churn.  SaaS requires a very tight operational model and has moved business an art to a science and now there are an entire new class to tools to improve revenue performance and reduce costs.  Some of these next generation of tools include:

Sales Automation

EchoSign - Provides electronic signature and contract management.

InsideView - Sales business intelligence and social media platform.

JigSaw - Business information and data services.

NetSuite - CRM and ERP suite.

RightNow - CRM, call center and social platform.

Salesforce.com - Salesforce is not only a solid Customer Relationship Management system but also a great system of record for all types of sales, marketing and service information and applications. Also offers a application marketplace that provides value added extensions.  Salesforce also offers Chatter a collaboration platform to improve internal communications.

SugarCRM - Open source based CRM that provides a robust no cost solution.

Marketing Automation

Eloqua - Marketing automation platform.

Genius.com - Sales and lead automation.

MarketBright - Marketing and lead generation management.

Marketo - Marketing and revenue management.

Pardot - Business to Business lead automation.

SaaS Analytics

Birst - On demand business intelligence product.

Cloud9 Analytics - SaaS performance management.

GoodData - SaaS business intelligence product.

PivotLink - On demand business intelligence product.

Using many of these tools companies can help a SaaS firm track their business, sales and marketing performance.  The question that I often get is ‘what should I be tracking?’  There are an emerging set of SaaS-based business metrics that include Monthly Recurring Revenues (MRR), Churn, Customer Acquisition Costs (CAC), The Magic Number (MN) and others that provide very precise views into how a SaaS business is performing.  Here is a chart that details some of the more common SaaS business metrics by functional area:

Other resources to learn about SaaS metrics;

5 C’s of SaaS Finance - Bessemer Ventures

Chaotic Flow - Joel York

For Entrepreneaurs - David Skok, Matrix Partners

Haut Tech - Michael Dunham at Scio Development

My opinion about the SaaS business model is that there are a lot of new considerations about building a profitable subscription business today.  The buyers are different, there are many robust low-cost tools available, Cloud technology that can radically change your cost model and time to market as well as many other business factors, so the only real way to really tune your business for SaaS is to continually test everything!

I would be interested in your comments and hearing about what you are testing.

Stay tuned for Tip #4 Sales & Marketing on a Budget