Here is our updated Public Company SaaS interactive spreadsheet.  Enjoy!

The broader SaaS market (I would include PaaS and Cloud Computing) have been really interesting this year and here are some of the notable news items that have caught my attention over the past couple of months:

Mergers & Acqusitions

SuccessFactors buys CubeTree for $50M… Interesting move into the collaboration space

IBM buys CastIron … Nice compliment to their Cloud Infrastructure offerings.  Is Boomi next?

… then IBM buys CoreMetrics.

Salesforce.com buys JigSaw for $142M! … Surprised that they would pay up for a content company.

CA buys Nimsoft for $350M … gets into the SaaS infrastructure management market.  Good company.

SAP buys Sybase for $5.8B …  not sure about this one?  A diversion to deflect attention away from BBD?

RedPrairie buys SmartTurn … traditional SCM provider begins their move to SaaS.

VMWare looking at EngineYard … interesting since Amazon funded this Ruby-on-Rails PaaS startup.

Fundings & IPO’s

Marketing Automation: Marketo raises $10M Series D, led by Mayfield.

Enterprise Collaboration: Yammer raises $10M Series B, led by Emergence Capital.

Financial Analytics:  Host Analytics raises $15M Series C, led by Next World Capital.

Cloud Business Intelligence:  Cloud9 Analytics raises $8M Series C, led by Mayfield.

Recent SaaS/Cloud IPO’s include Convio, SPS Commerce and Financial Engines.

New Products and Launches

Broadvision launches Clearvale … Ning for the enterprise.

Plateau launches PaaS platform for Talent Management

Mercer partners with PeopleClick Authoria, first combination of HR consulting content with Talent Management technology platform

VMware and Force.com partner, launch VMForce.

Lawson launches ERP Cloud offering on Amazon AWS … too little, too late?

Recently Profiled SaaS Companies by Montclair Advisors

Birst, CentralDesktop, Cloud9 Analytics, GoodData, Marketo, Netsuite and WOLF Frameworks.

There are definitely a lot going on in the SaaS and Cloud Computing markets and we will continue to cover newsworthy events and profile leading players throughout 2010.

Since everyone is interested in SaaS funding and valuations I thought it would be helpful to tell you about an interesting Cloud Computing investor panel I attended at the recent All About the Cloud conference in SF. The session was moderated by Jason Green from Emergence Capital Partners and was joined by Gary Hromadko from Crosslink Capital, Mark McNay from William Blair and Evangelos Simoudis from Trident Capital.

So what did they have to say?

The market has finally changed for the better

2009 was all about survival and the venture community did less than half the investments than in a typical year.

This year is now about growing again and current investments are more focused on companies that have weathered the economic downturn. Their investments are focused on changing the slope of these types of company’s growth curves, by concentrating more on sales and marketing.

SaaS and Cloud companies are leading the way

Consumers have been driving the adoption of easier to use Cloud-based solutions like eBay, iTunes, Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. They are viral and can reach critical mass very quickly because there are low barriers to adoption.

With SaaS, the recession has really pushed the advantages of a subscription business model and moving from CapEx to OpEx software investments. It’s like leasing your car rather than buying it.

Lean start-ups are definitely in. Almost all early stage software investments in 2009-10 are Cloud-based because it takes a fair amount of capital to fund SaaS firms and it takes a long time for them to reach profitability. One interesting comment was that later stage on-premise companies are now being asked about what their SaaS/Cloud strategy is for the future, because without it, they may find funding might be difficult.

What the VC’s are looking for

SaaS 1.0 focused on a company’s income statement, expenses and cash flows than GAAP reported financials. One important measurement is a company’s incremental contribution margins (gross margins), which is critical for SaaS. Companies needed to balance capital efficiency with building a business that can scale.

Investors are looking for unique business processes that can only be built or automated through SaaS or the Cloud. Emergence latest investments are pure Cloud-based companies that have viral qualities like YouSendit, the files sharing company and Yammer and the enterprise micro-blogging firm, both of these companies are viral enterprise solutions. Yammer has more than 70,000 customers with at least 1 user and is signing up between 7-10,000 users a month and 10% are turning into paying customers. Crosslink invested in Carbonite, a backup and recovery company, has high margins and is the only other independent player in the category with Mozy, who is owned by EMC. They felt that scarcity of competitors and their ability to manage Customer Acquisition Costs were important in establishing the company’s value.

The panelists also said they are looking for companies that have a rigorous focus on metrics like Customer Lifetime Value and Customer Acquisition Costs. In fact CAC appears to drive business value because it has a lot to do with capital efficiency and the company’s ability to grow their business.

Exits, IPO’s and Valuations

Economy has recovered and CEO’s are ready to start taking on more risk, and it’s a real change in psychology because we are at the beginning of a macro trend that will last more than 10 years.

This is evident by more than 100 M&A transactions last quarter including high profile deals like IBM buying CastIron, Salesforce buying Jigsaw for $142M, Successfactors buying CubeTree for $50M. The current environment is right for deals, especially as SaaS is gaining enterprise momentum with recent deals like SuccessFactors’ mega deal with Walmart for 1.6M users. Transactions like Jigsaw, CubeTree, and CA’s purchase of 3Tera and Nimsoft for $350M all indicate a return to a healthy M&A atmosphere, that will probably last for the next 12-18 months.

Oracle and SAP won’t be aggressive on the M&A front until they come to the realization that they can’t build Cloud solutions internally. Because many SaaS companies have now crossed the $25-30M in recurring revenues threshold, these firms may become quite attractive to these larger ISV’s looking to make the move to the SaaS business model.

But these acquirers don’t want to take on the burn associated with many start-ups so it will be important to stay close to breakeven and you may have to sacrifice growth for profitability. Since the access to capital is still tight, start-ups will have to try and collect cash upfront and continue to tune their business models to improve cash flows.

Companies that seem to own a category have perceived scarcity value which will result in a premium on any transaction, especially if they are perceived to own a segment franchise. VC’s and acquirers are looking for a minimum of 40% CAGR to get a premium valuation.

On the other side of the liquidity front, the IPO window for SaaS companies is beginning to open up and firms like SolarWinds and LogMeIn have now been joined by SPS Commerce and Convio. At least before the recent stock market downturn, these companies had traded up by 15% since their IPOs.

The panel seemed to believe that the market is definitely getting better and that is good news for SaaS and Cloud Computing companies looking for funding or an exit!

After our post on January 26th we got several great comments about the cost of starting a SaaS company.  It definitely takes a commitment to build a true SaaS company, especially when you consider some the following facts about the 15 public companies that I tracked in my high level analysis:

• Average Start-up Capital Required:                                   $44M
• Average Time Required from Start-up till IPO:                 7 years
• Average Capital Required per Year till IPO (Burn):             $6.8M
• Average IPO Proceeds:                                                    $76M
• Additional Capital Raised After the IPO:                           $243M
• Average Total Capital Raised:                                          $363M
• Average Market Capitalization:                                      $1,262M
• Companies Who are Profitable:                                            8

The costs of getting a SaaS start-up off the ground are substantial but only about half of the firms we tracked actually started out as a pure SaaS company.   These other Cross-Over firms started out as either Application Service Providers (ASP’s) or were traditional On-premise ISV’s that move to SaaS through a combination of organic migration or through a series of acquisitions.  Companies like Concur, Kenexa, Taleo and Ultimate Software have all transitioned to SaaS from an on-premise heritage.

Montclair Advisors - SaaS Start Up Costs - Pre IPO

The shortest time to go from start-up phase to an IPO was 4 years and the longest was 13 years.  Most of the firms we tracked were founded between 1997 to 1999, which was prior and during the Internet Bubble.

When these firms went public they raised a range between $30M (LivePerson and Ultimate Software) to over $150M (DealerTrack and NetSuite), but on average they raised about $75M.  All the firms then went on to do additional capital raises from $32M (LivePerson) up to $750M (DealerTrack) but on average each raised $243M!   The total capital raised, when considering both pre IPO, IPO and post IPO capital raised, these firms raised between $100M (LivePerson and Ultimate Software) to close to more than $500M (DealerTrack, Salesforce.com and SuccessFactors).

Montclair Advisors - SaaS Start Up Costs - Post IPO

After going public, this SaaS market basket of companies have done well as a group.  The majority of the firms are profitable, which makes for solid cash flow performance, revenue visibility and overall stability of the company’s stock, for the real SaaS firms.

The most valuable company, based on their Market Cap is Salesforce.com at more than $8B and there are at least 4 other SaaS firms with valuations over $1B (Blackboard, Concur, NetSuite and SuccessFactors).  When comparing the amount of capital raised to the market valuation, the 5 best performing firms are Salesforce.com (.09), Ultimate Software (.13) , Concur (.19), RightNow (.22) and LivePerson (.31).

Montclair Advisors - SaaS Start Up Costs - Market Caps

This year, as the economy improves, promises to launch a few new SaaS IPOs and we will continue to track this core group as well as a larger group of Hybrids and Cross Overs and will periodically report back with our findings.

When speaking with entrepreneurs and investors about the investment required to start up a new Software-as-a-Service company, I often refer back to this list.   At Montclair Advisors thought this would be a handy reference for those looking to start a SaaS company during 2010.

Looks like you might need a money tree to start a SaaS company, but for those that reach critical mass and go public, there is a tremendous payback.  This is information has been gathered from various sources including Wachovia, CrunchBase and Google Finance.

In Charles Darwin’s landmark work on the Theory of Evolution, he stated that “…Natural selection acts only by taking advantage of slight successive variations; it can never take a great and sudden leap, but must advance by short and sure, though slow steps.” Based on what has been happening with our economy over the past six months, the Human Capital Management software world is going to be forced to do a quick evolution.

Times are tough; just consider the global economic slowdown over the past three years. In 2007 it was the sub-prime mortgage crisis, in 2008 it was the Banking crisis and in 2009 we are beginning to see the Human Resources crisis.

This is very different environment for HR professionals than the old War for Talent era that was discussed by industry experts over the past five years; this current crisis is more related to a dramatic reduction in jobs in the economy and unemployment approaching 10%. Human Resources related budgets and headcount have been cut way back in an effort to stem the financial tide. Unfortunately most companies were not ready to eliminate anywhere from 5-30% of their workforces overnight. Not only were they not prepared for this change but they probably don’t completely understand what the future impact of their actions will be for their workforces. These dramatic changes have left HR in a precarious position looking forward because they have little in the way of staff or resources but their charter remains the same.

HR’s Rapid Evolution

As someone who sold HCM software for the last 12 years, it was always part of the sales pitch that the HR organization is always expected to do more with less. Now that the environment has really changed, when senior executives now say to HR, ‘do more with less,’ they really mean it.

Just like in natural selection, the HR survivors need to evolve. So in this brave new world, you no longer have the level of resources that that you have taken for granted for years. Resources like IT support, capital dollars in your annual budget, a team of people to work on projects and time. You may ask, how do I evolve? With dramatically less people, budget and basically the same responsibilities, you need to automate as much of your workload as well as your personal interactions. In this new world, the human touch is going to be at a real premium when it comes to HR.

Well - now that you are completely depressed, let’s review some ideas on how you can be an HR survivor. Did you know that most companies have up to 200 different HR suppliers, depending on the size of your company? Do you really need all of them? Since you are now in a zero sum budget exercise, start looking at your operating expenses as one big pot of money and start determining what is essential and what is optional. As you start your process, you need to free up budget to fund critical automation projects that can enable HR to continue to push along its strategic objectives. This may actually be a process that your IT business partners might actually be willing to help you with, since they are feeling HR’s pain like never before.

Natural Selection

So as you start thinking about your natural selection budget project, you should start to build out your game plan by trading out your old software for new software. My general conclusion about software is simple, old software is bad and new software is good.

Let me explain…

Many of the current Human Capital Management software providers evolved from PeopleSoft. PeopleSoft was the leading HR software provider in the market for nearly twenty years and spawned a complete suite of Enterprise Resource Planning applications including benefits administration, payroll and other HR applications. When PeopleSoft was purchased by Oracle in 2005, Oracle became the dominant provider but they appear to have no clear future plans for their HR software. So you need to continue to pay maintenance for old software, which keeps getting older.

When thinking about natural selection for HR software, think about the clear disadvantages in the current environment for your old school software provider:

• Software requires a large capital investment. This might be really difficult to get funded in our current environment, no matter how critical the software is to your company’s objectives.

• Implementation projects are both long and complex. Lots of investment to support customization and an expensive team of consultants who will live on-site for months or years. The consultants have to install your software in your data center, which will require a significant investment in hardware and infrastructure.

• Massive software upgrades. Whether it is moving from PeopleSoft 8 to PeopleSoft ? or to the latest version of SAP, these upgrades are expensive and require a lot of internal support resources and a big hardware investment.

• Lack of flexibility. The older software providers typically have rigid products, which make it tough to make even basic changes to features, reports or anything else. This is also a big disadvantage of buying all your HR software from a single vendor, like Oracle or SAP.

• Don’t play well with others. Ideally all of the software works together to make it easier to configure workflows, data elements, reports, and analytics because your data is sitting in a lot of different systems. If your software isn’t open to working with other systems, it can get really expensive, and you don’t have any budget to glue everything together.

Now you can see why old software is bad… and why they may be going the way of the dinosaur in the next 5-10 years. That’s right, even Oracle and SAP. Remember MSA and McCormick & Dodge!

What attributes should you be looking for in your future surviving HCM software suppliers?

These survivors have these clear market advantages:

• Software-as-a-Service. You have probably heard this term but it is simply when the software company rents you the software and you subscribe to their service the next 3-5 years. Because of this approach to delivering software as a service, SaaS firms are forced to be more cost-efficient because they get paid over time. SaaS software is delivered to your users through the Internet, which means your IT department doesn’t have to have to buy or support any software or hardware – this can save your company a lot of money.

• Long-term relationships. Because you rent the software, your SaaS provider has a vested interest in keeping you happy because you will want to continue to renew your subscription to the their software. Unlike old software firms who would sell you their software and disappear, SaaS firms are encouraged to stay close their clients and listen to your input.

• Incremental changes. It was not only the expense but also the tremendous organizational disruption associated with large software upgrades that customers really dislike about the old software model. SaaS clients enjoy a ongoing stream of transparent upgrades, that fix bugs, add features and their software literally evolves over time.

• Less extra costs. Since SaaS providers host their software in their own data centers, your company doesn’t need any IT staff to support their software or infrastructure (servers, firewalls and security) typically required to run HR applications.

• Configuration. SaaS firms offer more flexibility in the way they set up your software. Unlike the older software firms that bring a cast of thousands to customize and install your software, SaaS companies can set up an initial version of your software in minutes or hours rather than in months. Then once they understand your business needs, the software can be configured without custom programming. This approach saves you both time and money.

• Open for business. In this new world it will be difficult for any company to purchase every type of HR software from a single provider, so it is important for software to communicate and share information with many different software packages. This sharing will enable you to automate as many HR tasks as possible, allowing you to do more with fewer resources over time.

Slow Evolution of HCM Software

A little known fact is that the original Software-as-a-Service provider is Automatic Data Processing. They have been delivering payroll and HR services as a service, for nearly fifty years. Their offerings started out as a basic payroll service and their internal software just helped them to deliver their service more efficiently to their clients.

In the 1990’s, the next generation of on-line solutions appeared - where on-premise software was transitioned to being hosted in providers’ data centers (commonly referred to as Application Service Providers). A number of HR ASP software providers emerged including: Employease, PeopleSoft eCenter, and Workscape.

Then about ten years later, the conversation evolved from just hosting traditional software and a new model emerged - on-demand software, that provided a pay-as-you-go pricing model along with streamlined upgrades and new support processes. Some of these on-demand providers included: Authoria, Kenexa, SumTotal, Stepstone and Ultimate Software.

Then just a few years ago SaaS providers started to gain momentum. These firms really looked at delivering their software truly as a service and never delivered it on premise, sold in the traditional way. The HR SaaS providers always delivered their software over the Internet, with a modest amount of services, no upgrades, per-employee-month pricing and self-service support. Many better known HR SaaS providers include SuccessFactors, Taleo and Workday.

The next generation of HCM software might be based on Cloud Computing, where the SaaS providers no longer own their data centers and use providers like Google or Amazon.com to deliver world-class infrastructure support at on a pay-per-transaction fee. This approach could drive down costs, complexity and make a wide range of traditionally expensive HCM software much more affordable for small and medium-sized businesses.

Darwin Speaks

The HCM software market has undergone a number of wide ranging transformations over the last thirty years. We come back to the premise of old software is bad and new software is good. Old software is bad because it is expensive to maintain, modify and upgrade. Software teams that have the experience of working on traditional software but now working at new companies where they are using modern techniques might find it difficult to make their software better, faster and cheaper.

As you think of your portfolio of HCM software providers, maybe Darwin could help. And if Darwin were alive today, and knew about Human Capital Management software, I think he could put many of your company’s providers into these categories:

• Endangered – they are doing some of the right things to turn themselves into survivors but haven’t turned the corner just yet. These are the providers you need to keep a close eye on, just in case they become extinct.

• Extinct – those providers who are on the downside of innovation, living off of your precious maintenance, old architectures, delivered on premise and probably won’t be around for the long term.

• Survivors – those software firms who are worthy of your investment and will be in the market for the long term.

Company: SuccessFactors
Started: 2001
Located: San Mateo, California
Geography: Global
Market: On-Demand Performance and Talent Management

Products: Goal Management

Performance Management

Compensation Management

Learning and Development

Succession Planning

Recruitment Management

360 Degree Reviews

StackRanker

Employee Profile

Business Performance Accelerators

Mid-Size Business Solutions

Small Business Solutions

Individual Manager Solutions

Key Customers: Advo, Allianz SE, Cadbury Schweppes, Hilton, Kimberly-Clark, Gen-Probe, PETCO, and Rexel

Website: SuccessFactors

Blog: Performance and Talent Management Blog

Podcast: People Performance Radio – US Edition

Recent News:

SuccessFactors Drives Business Performance in Asia Pacific with Number of Customers Up 160% since 2006; Empowers Goal of Tens of Millions of Users in Emerging Markets

Top Analyst Firm Positions SuccessFactors in ”Leaders” Quadrant in 2009 Report on Employee Performance Management Software

Orange Deploys SuccessFactors to 13,000 Employees in the UK

I asked Lars Dalgaard, SuccessFactors’ Chief Executive Officer a few questions about his business and his view of the SaaS market in 2009.

Did you start out as a Software-as-a-Service company?

Absolutely. Since the beginning, we built SuccessFactors as an on-demand platform in the cloud from the ground up. The underlying technology platform is called the SuccessFactors Web Component Engine, and it’s the basis for all SuccessFactors’ applications. The Web Component Engine was built on a multi-tenant architecture with a single-code base incorporating expertise gained from working with more than 2,600 customers worldwide. The platform includes a set of reusable technology components such as a business process template designer, workflow engine and data permission model. It’s the foundation of SuccessFactors’ Performance and Talent Management Suite and enables us to quickly innovate and create new applications to drive business performance for our customers.

Why do your customers buy from SuccessFactors?

By using the latest research, the smartest technology, and the most secure systems on the planet, SuccessFactors works every day to help companies achieve tangible and measurable results, lower costs, and align their organizations.

Since day one, SuccessFactors has been focused on customer success and our on-demand platform helps us do this quickly – getting customer-driven product evolution and frequent enhancements up-and-running when they need it. We also deliver innovative, customer-driven new features on an iterative monthly basis, allowing customers to continuously increase the value they receive from us.

By listening to what our customers want and then taking action immediately to deliver what they need, we’re providing the ultimate level of customer service while providing fun, easy-to-use, user-centric software that creates real business value for our customers and encourages better adoption companywide.

What do you see as the key trend emerging in the SaaS industry?

• It’s going to accelerate. Hard economic times force innovation and companies are keeping a close eye on the bottom line, so this is going to speed up the pace that companies adopt lower cost of deployment SaaS offerings, delivered via Cloud Computing

• SaaS and Cloud Computing will continue to innovate and be easier to use. We are going to see more companies making SaaS as easy to use as Google, Amazon and a slew of other consumer applications and Web sites. Driving adoption and everyday usage will continue to be very important.

• Customer service is HUGE. Today companies care most about doing more with less and keeping their existing customers DELIGHTED. They had to do this before but now it’s critical – they can’t afford to lose customers. We interact and work closely with our customers on a daily basis – a paradigm shift from the legacy, on premise software sales model of selling multi-million dollar license deals and then reengaging the customer five years later. Companies with lots of customers and smart strategies are pouring everything into keeping customers DELIGHTED and the SaaS model makes the product more relevant, flexible, and scalable to the customers’ needs.

What is your outlook for 2009?

Our customers are putting increased focus on their top talent and high performers to make sure these people are motivated and engaged ­– a critical strategy during today’s economic downturn. SuccessFactors is giving them the tools to really hone in on who’s doing great work, while also providing the clarity to help them make tough business decisions. The War for talent has not ended. A company’s top performers are still being targeted by competition.

There has been a lot of discussion about the strength and resilience of the SaaS model during uncertain economic times. We get that. But what is more crucial is that companies really need to focus on energizing, retaining and keeping their best people motivated. It’s not a ”nice to have,” it’s a must have. Currently, companies are spending about 70 percent of operating expenses on their people. Companies need to be ahead of the curve, and SuccessFactors helps provide ways to make better business decisions in today’s tough economy.

Thank you to Lars Dalgaard and Jennifer Gazin for contributing to this profile.

I listened to an interesting panel discussion at the Opsource, SaaS Summit a few days ago and I thought I would share what I heard.

Venture capital panelists were from Intel Capital, Emergence Capital Partners, CrossLink Capital and Hummer Winblad Venture Partners and Merrill Lynch.

New Investments

Seems like there was no agreement from the panel about what stage of investment was the most popular given the downturn.   There were several Series A and Seed investments that were mentioned including Crowd Factory and Zuberance.  One bright spot for investors was the fact that OpenTable has filed for an IPO, which would be a good step in the right direction given 2008’s anemic IPO performance.

Zombie Venture Capitalists

Most of the panelists had done some investments in the past six months but it is clear that SaaS entrepreneurs need to be on the look out for Zombie VC’s, who are still operating but are no longer making investments.  These walking dead  have their lights on, they have websites, and cash to support existing investments but no longer have enough cash to add new portfolio companies.  In writing this post I even discovered that peHUB publishes a list of these Zombie VC’s.  If they haven’t made any new investments during 2008, then I would be careful about wasting any time with these firms.

Flat is the New Up

One phrase that was uttered more than once is that ‘Flat is the New Up’.  Although when it comes to Software as a Service…  it appears that ‘Up is still Up’.  Even in 2008, most publicly traded SaaS companies have bounced back from their lows by an aggregate of 20%, which is much better than the S&P 500.  Apparently Wall Street likes SaaS companies and now are valuing them at 3 to 3.5 times their recurring revenues, unfortunately at the beginning of 2008 that number was closer to 8x.  Keep in mind that this is better than a lot of public firms that are currently trading at their cash values.  Other Wall Street analysts are valuing SaaS firms at 12x their cash flow but it is difficult to understand if there is a consistent valuation metric that firms or investors should be using.

Another interesting development is that Venture firms are now forced to value their private portfolio the same way they would value a portfolio of publicly traded stocks due to new accounting regulations (FASB 157).  Based on the discussion this new regulation, it will only create more company valuation compression on top an already tough market for portfolio companies.

What Does a Good Investment Look Like?

So what are the VC’s looking for in an attractive investment in this market?  Apparently the same things they were looking for in the past; a game changing idea, the team, the product and a big market.   If you are a software company you better be offering a real SaaS solution or be leveraging the Cloud Computing to even be considered.

They are also looking for new portfolio companies to be more conservative about spending their precious cash.  There is now an overt trade-off between the rapid growth rates of the last five years and capital efficiency to provide a longer runway for portfolio companies.  The panelists indicated that they would like to see their new Series A companies, for example those who might raise $4 million, to survive at least for 18-24 months before going out for their next round!  With the difficult market dynamics it is important for SaaS firms to form a strong syndicate when raising capital because your next round will be an insider round.

The panel indicated that they are looking for operating executives who know how to manage cash and scrub expenses.  Another observation was that many of the early stage companies that they are seeing now are much more mature and well run than they were just a few years ago.

There also won’t be any more Salary.com (NASDAQ: SLRY) IPO’s of $15 million companies.  IPO candidates will need to be $50 to $70 million in revenues and ideally profitable before filing their S-1.

For public SaaS companies you are going to see a slow down in the rapid growth rates we were seeing from companies like Salesforce.com (NYSE: CRM) and SuccessFactors (NASDAQ: SFSF).  Public markets want to see profitability first and growth now comes second.  Momentum stocks, those with high growth rates were trading at 8-9 times revenues, like Salesforce and SuccessFactors, are giving way to slower growth companies that are profitable and are given a multiple on cash flows.

Customer Acquisition Costs

When building your SaaS business model, it is important to assume that for every dollar of recurring revenue you will probably need to invest $.50 to $1.00 in your Customer Acquisition Costs (CAC). It is important than ever to have an active program of testing various CAC channels and tactics to maximize your investments.  Then you need to have a smart statistical framework that you can explain to your investors.

Smart firms like EchoSign and YouSendIt are creating leads virally by infecting their customers and they are finding that they are finding 1/3 to 1/2 of all of their leads are generated organically.   It is also important to leverage distribution channels, especially companies that have access to large customer bases like Salesforce.com, Google, and Intuit.  Take more of a focused approach to your customer acquisition efforts by targeting a vertical market and use the power of your customer referrals because ‘word of mouth’ is the least expensive and most effective lead generation engine.  Keep in mind that your sales process needs to be as easy as possible, in other words it needs to be ‘friction-less’.  When your prospects sign up for a trial, it only takes a few minutes and weeks and they can do it without any involvement from your company.  Give them a free trial, a sandbox a free version.

So I came away from this panel discussion with the following advice for companies looking for funding in this environment:

1. You need to still need to have a great idea, product and team but you might need to have reduced risk for your potential investors.
2. Demonstrate your company knows how to stretch a dollar as far as possible.  Fewer employees is better… think Craigslist.
3. Show traction.  Number of transactions, members, customers, revenues, profits.
4. Shop carefully for your potential investors and don’t waste time with Zombies.

When most companies think about moving towards a Software-as-a-Service business model they often just change their pricing model.  You know the drill, instead of charging a big perpetual license fee upfront with some services and then an annual maintenance fee, you switch over to a SaaS agreement that is structured quite differently; with the subscription being spread over the term of the agreement and some upfront services to get started.

Don’t get me wrong, changing your pricing is a big deal if you are a traditional software company.  By changing your pricing dynamic you are moving from a Capital Expense (CapEx)  to an Operating Expense (OpEx) orientation, this is a dramatic change!  It’s even a bigger deal if you are a publicly traded software company.  But the overall SaaS business model is really all about monitoring and measuring metrics, ratios and statistics.

I ran into a very interesting company recently, OpEx Engine,  that has done extensive benchmarking of SaaS and technology companies, and has complied a library of operational metrics for over 50 public and privately held software firms. Lauren Kelley, OpEx’s CEO is an ex- Art Technology Group (ARTG) executive who realized that smart technology  people were looking for these types of real-world benchmarks and operating metrics. Lauren’s team has spent the last two years accumulating a lot of really value information.  I can’t tell you how many times I have looked for good comparative metrics on how much companies typically invested in sales and marketing, research and development and G&A when building out a business model.  For instance, did you know that of all of the publicly-traded SaaS companies that DealerTracker (TRAK) has the lowest R&D investment as a percentage of their revenue? (4.9%)  Did you also know that Salesforce.com (CRM), Omniture (OMTR), NetSuite (N), and SuccessFactors (SFSF) all spend more than 50% of their revenues on sales and marketing? That’s an easy one but you should definately check out the free information that Lauren provides on her site.

There are many other metrics that are needed to successfully run a SaaS company but one of the most important is your overall cost of sales and marketing.  Understanding what your true Customer Acquisition Costs is a critical SaaS business performance indicator.  I was recently at the SIIA On Demand Conference in San Jose where I heard Josh James, the CEO at Omniture present his sales and marketing modeling methodology, that he has dubbed the ‘Magic Number’ for SaaS companies.   Since it would probably justify a completely separate post, all I can say that this is a really innovative way to determine if your % of sales and marketing spend is either too much or too little.  Phil Wainewright wrote a great piece on the Magic Number - When to spend cash in a SaaS business - which is definitely worth reading.  What Omniture has done really well is to figure out the overall profitability of their clients, market saturation, marketing effectiveness and the number of Quota Bearing Sales Reps (QBSR’s) that are required to grab market share. It’s cool.

Other sources of good SaaS market information and metrics are:

TripleTree, a boutique investment bank which conducts some solid SaaS research, Cutter Consortium, Saugatuck Technologies, and Jeff Kaplan’s firm Think Strategies.

If you hear of any other good ones, let me know.