Tag: SuccessFactors

At Montclair Advisors I work with many different types and sizes of software firms that are jumping into the SaaS business model for the first time.   Here are a few tips that I would tell a new client who is looking to get into the SaaS business in 2012.

Think “Whole Product”

A SaaS offering is more than just software, it is also the services to get the product up and running, training, support, the infrastructure and security.

For most SaaS firms, they really view their platform as synonymous with their company’s overall brand, which includes more than just the technology. This brand promise is a product experience that is smooth and consistent. It also takes into account issues like business continuity and being able to quickly restore systems and data after an outage. This also means that SaaS offerings must understand and how to properly manage security and compliance concerns for large, complex customers.  In some cases this promise needs to do a high level of monitoring and even anticipate and correct problems before they occur.

When considering the professional service component of a SaaS offering, there should be extra focus on efficient provisioning and on-boarding of new customers. It is important to make this initial experience quick and easy in order to improve the customer’s overall time-to-value. By combining many customer-facing functions like support, training and service into a Customer Success team is also another popular way of trying to deliver a positive ‘whole’ product experience.

Focus on Adoption and Consumption

The economics of SaaS requires both a high rate of new customer sales combined with a better than 90% renewal rate for the financial model to work. The trick that the really fast growing SaaS firms have discovered is that up-selling additional capacity and cross-selling new products not only increases top line revenues but also improves overall Customer Acquisition Costs (CAC) and business margins.

The objective in any software company should always be to build a satisfied customer-base, but in the SaaS model you can’t stop there, it is important get customers to actively use and adoption the product. When a product is easy-to-use, intuitive, being used every day, and built on a solid platform, then it can become viral. Viral products like DropBox, Yammer and Salesforce.com’s Chatter can throw off high marginal add-on sales, that can boost a SaaS company’s revenues very quickly. This type of product consumption is important for all SaaS company’s even if the use of their product may never go viral.

It’s All About Growth

Many new SaaS firms spend a lot of time and capital building out their products, which makes sense. Often they underestimate the amount of effort and focus required to build a high growth sales and marketing machine. Because it is hard initially to jump start the recurring revenue model, it is important to develop a highly productive sales methodology, usually based on a ‘land and expand’ approach. For the most successful SaaS companies (SuccessFactors, Salesforce.com, Workday), an aggressive Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) is imperative to building a profitable company.  Many of these firms, even though they are large, are still growing at 30-50% per year.

In order to build this sales and marketing engine, it requires a meaningful investment in lead generation, a sales organization that separates hunters from farmers and has a set of metrics that are tracked at least weekly. For ISV’s that are moving to a SaaS model, don’t co-mingle the SaaS and non-SaaS sales teams. Each sales team should be very focused on selling a single type of product or a single function. For example, having a SaaS team that focuses on selling only new SaaS deals, another is only doing renewals or up-selling.

Because products and markets are different, it is important to constantly be testing lead generation, pricing, packaging and sales processes in order to find the best one that works for your business. If something doesn’t work, stop doing it, and pivot to another idea. The best SaaS companies are always testing and trying to improve their revenue generation processes.

Optimize Cost of Goods Sold

Most SaaS executives are focused on their COGS and how best to optimize them. This is why many early SaaS firms use free open source software and Infrastructure-as-a-Service providers to build out their platforms, or outsource components of their business to partners to save money. The best way to optimize COGS is to reduce the number of people required to on-board, provision and operate your SaaS platform. It is better to automate as many of your processes as possible, which not only saves precious capital, but also can often improve the overall scalability of the business.

One the best examples of this type of automation is with the popular commercial SaaS storage solution DropBox [Check out this video]. They have built a service that is easy to use, self-provisioning and needs no human intervention. This is why they were able to on-board 40 million new customers during the last 12 months with a net increase of only 7 people across their entire company! This is where SaaS companies can become very profitable and grow very quickly.

Another area that can really impact COGS is related to the 30-day trials associated with most SaaS software. Without a scalable platform that has a sufficient level of automation, the launching, management, tear down and re-provisioning of resources will all be done by an ever growing team of professional services or IT professionals. Best practice is to leverage a multi-tenant platform and automate everything possible.

Strive for Independence

For ISV’s who are either transitioning to or launching a new SaaS offering, it is important to seriously consider keeping the new SaaS organization separate from the main business. I have seen many ‘shared service’ models where different groups share sales, operations, demand generation, services and even support and they experience a lot of challenges. The SaaS business model in many ways is unique and conflicts with most traditional software business practices.

For example, professional services in most software companies is a revenue-center and they are always looking for ways to generate additional projects and revenue. At a SaaS company, the professional services team is doing the opposite.  A SaaS services team is trying to minimize their level of involvement with the customer, and the less services involved in setting up a SaaS product, the better. This would be a difficult group to manage if you have both a revenue quota and are also trying to minimize revenue associated with SaaS accounts.

The other reason I often recommend creating an independent group for transitioning ISV’s is that the overall rate and pace of SaaS companies is quite different than traditional software firms. SaaS firms develop products more quickly, sales processes are faster, deployments are more rapid and this mismatch in speed creates a lot of stress when traditional ISVs try to adopt this rate and pace.

It is also important to continue the care and feeding of the core business and realize that is also a critical success factor. By allowing this type of co-existence you can move at the right rate and pace, while continuing to build and run your core business.

There are many other tips and tricks to starting your SaaS business.  Feel free to email me at kevin@montclairadvisors.com and I have some other materials that can be helpful for those who are new to the SaaS model.

As it turned out I was right about 50% of my predictions last year, so here’s my educated guesses for what is going to happen to the SaaS market in 2012:

#10  Oracle will buy Netsuite.

I know this isn’t much of a surprise since Larry Ellison owns approximately 65% of Netsuite, but with the RightNow acquisition, this type of move makes more sense as part of coordinated Cloud acquisition strategy.

#9  SaaS IPO window remains open.

There are a number of SaaS firms who have either filed, like Eloqua, or are seriously considering going public in 2012, like Workday, Dropbox, Box, and Guidewire.  This window can be opened even wider by successful IPO’s from companies like Yelp and Facebook.  The only problem is that there are over 100 companies who have already filed to go public in 2012, so it might be difficult for smaller SaaS firms to do their IPO.

#8. Master brands will continue to chase SaaS offerings.

IBM just purchased DemandTec and SAP bought SuccessFactors, while Oracle bought RightNow.  This is a big change from 2010 when most of these companies were not interested in the Cloud or SaaS.  All of these master brands have tried to build their own SaaS businesses, but I think they have now finally realized that SaaS is a business model, not just new technology.  The smart firms will keep their SaaS businesses and their core license businesses separate and not try and merge them.  Good luck.

#7. Workday will have a monster IPO.

There is no doubt that the 2012 IPO of Facebook will set all sorts of records but for enterprise software, I think Workday will be one of the biggest on record.  The company just took in $85 million in funding over the past few months, in what was termed an IPO preview round. Workday could raise as much as $500 million in an IPO, which would force the big ERP players to start building out their SaaS businesses as a defensive strategy at the bare minimum.

#6. SaaS starts to go global.

I was involved in an Oracle SaaS webinar a couple of weeks ago for an audience in Europe and the response was really impressive.  I initially thought that most of the registrants would be from the UK, the Netherlands, Germany and Scandinavia.  Actually there were attendees from almost every country in Europe.  I have also started to hear about strong SaaS interest in Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, Japan, China and many other countries.  2012 will just continue to build on the SaaS market’s growing global momentum.

#5. Salesforce continues to expand beyond CRM.

During 2011 Salesforce purchased several firms that added new capabilities to their platform including DimDim (collaboration), Radian6 (social analytics), Model Metrics (mobility) and then they bought Rypple in December, which launched them into the Human Capital market.  I predict that Salesforce will add several other HCM tuck-in acquisitions (JobScience, Jobvite), financial applications (FinancialForce, Zuora), or even supply chain management (Glovia OM, Kenandy).

#4. IT Management and Security SaaS offerings emerge.

Companies like CA have been successful in launching their new Nimsoft ITM SaaS offering during 2011, but there are also many other firms that are beginning to gain momentum with their new SaaS offerings as well. This is a very big market opportunity to replace existing legacy infrastructure and security offerings. Companies to watch include Service-Now, Trustwave, Splunk, PingIdentity and Proofpoint.

(Note: CA/Nimsoft and PingIdentity are Montclair Advisors clients)

#3. SaaS continues to be social.

With Jive going public during December 2011, they are just the most recent example of SaaS social applications gaining market acceptance.  Salesforce has been very successful with their Chatter and Radian6 offerings.  Independents like Yammer, SocialCast, Lithium and CentralDesktop will continue to see increased demand for their social/collaboration platforms.

#2. More big VC rounds for SaaS firms.

2012 will continue to see VC’s put a lot of money to work with leading SaaS companies.  We saw some major investments during 2011 including Box ($81 million), Dropbox ($250 million), HubSpot ($32 million), Marketo ($50 million), Workday ($85 million) and Zuora ($35 million).  This trend will continue in 2012 and companies will be putting a lot of money to work to build out their platforms and distribution capabilities.

#1. Storage is a major story for 2012.

As more and more data is stored in the Cloud, consumers and businesses are looking to all different types of on-line storage services.  During the year that Apple launched its iCloud small business and music storage service, we also saw major funding rounds for SaaS companies including Dropbox and Box.  We even saw a new IPO from Carbonite that provides a small business/consumer Cloud back-up service.  This is definitely a segment of the SaaS market to keep an eye on in 2012.

The buying habits of software buyers over the past couple of years has really shifted. The way software was sold in the recent past was by promoting its revenue-producing benefits or the Return On Investment (ROI). This changed when the Great Recession hit the broader software market and buyers started thinking less about ROI and more about reducing or controlling their overall operational costs.

Between 2008-2009 this was a natural reaction by most businesses because their revenues began to dry up and they needed to reduce costs, payrolls and other investments in order to survive.   This was when SaaS all of sudden made a lot of sense to software buyers because:

  • They could try the software before they bought it
  • Pay for the software through a subscription, usually out of the company’s operating budget
  • Only buy the software functionality they were going to use
  • The SaaS provider paid for and managed all of the required infrastructure
  • It was possible to get the software up and running very quickly

During this period of time most SaaS companies sold their products based solely on their Total Cost of Ownership or TCO benefits.  It was possible to make a strong case around shifting the software buyer’s costs from their capital budgets to their operating budgets, and this was attractive since most businesses were focused on conserving their cash.  This is why leading SaaS firms like Salesforce.com and SuccessFactors enjoyed very strong Compound Annual Growth Rates, usually in excess of 40%, even during the depths of the Great Recession.

A subtle benefit that buyers started realizing was that purchasing a software service was that all of the required software support and management costs like facilities, hardware, power and even staff, were no longer needed.  So companies could take fixed costs associated with facilities, infrastructure and staff and make them a variable expense by purchasing SaaS.  This is a powerful benefit because if the economy is bad then it is easy to dial down the costs and use less of the service and if things get better, then it is easy to add more capacity or functionality.  This shifting of fixed expenses to variable expenses continues to be popular among software buyers even now, given the instability in the economy.

As more businesses continue to look for ways to streamline their costs and improve overall agility, SaaS products are a nature enabler but buyers are starting to become more skeptical of blanket TCO savings claims.   Smart SaaS firms classify their product’s cost savings and business benefits in more of a tiered business justification framework that allow the software buyers to more easily build their own internal business cases.  By structuring costs and benefits in this way they have been able to retain their credibility during the sales cycle.

Here is an example of a simplified tiered cost/benefit structure for a SaaS product purchase that we have used with several of our software clients.  Costs are classified into hard costs, or as CFO’s refer to them as ‘real costs’ and then there are soft costs which are more productivity-based benefits.   Then there are strategic benefits that are not necessarily cost-based but provide additional benefits at a higher level.  Some of these may actually be revenue opportunities or ROI-based benefits.

Hard Cost Savings
  • Headcount
  • Facilities
  • Hardware
  • Power
Soft Cost Savings
  • Improved user productivity
  • Faster cycle times
  • Better reporting
  • Transactional accuracy
Strategic Benefits
  • Move fixed costs to variable costs
  • User adoption and engagement
  • Improved collaboration

CFO’s at companies that are buying software often follow a similar type of internal justification framework for purchases even of SaaS products.  The key is not to lead with an ROI-focused sales approach but more with a lower cost of operations and some additional benefits approach.

Remember that most companies are also looking for ways to free up capital that can be re-purposed towards innovation.  In fact, the larger the buyer, they probably have a lot of fixed IT costs and they are looking for creative ways to move some of these frozen capital investments over into new revenue producing projects.   As growth flattens out across the economy, all companies will need to come up with new products and services that will create a new demand stream that will increase growth rates.  [Think iPad]  Leveraging SaaS solutions is not only a great way of reduce existing operational costs, but this type of investment can also act as a catalyst for new innovation and growth opportunities.   Is an attractive theme for C-Level buyers in today’s market.

In summary, most organizations buying software today are not very focused on the ROI-types of benefits that were commonly sold during the last ten years.   Keep in mind that even a pure-TCO sales approach will be attractive to most buyers who continue to look for ways to lower or control operational costs.   The real winning formula to position your SaaS solution in a way that combines the TCO-saving theme with the ability to free up new funds for innovation.  This approach is even more potent when the SaaS product can actually be an innovation catalyst for creating new products and services.  The good news is that SaaS solutions can be positioned just for cost control (TCO), improvements in operational efficiencies, even increasing revenues (ROI) as well as a catalyst for innovation.

Depending on who you listen to, things are either recovering slowly, or we are slipping back into a recession. It can be argued that for most software companies, if you are selling a SaaS-based solution then it shouldn’t affect your business very much. In fact, as the economy gets tighter for buyers, SaaS solutions even make more sense for forward thinking businesses who are focusing on innovation and cost controls.

During the Great Recession we saw that traditional software companies experienced a net decline in their revenues and in some cases their revenues went down by nearly 50% year-over-year between 2008-2010. In big part this was because traditional software customers no longer had available the necessary capital dollars to spend on their perpetual license-based products and the banks were no longer lending.

These traditional software companies had also hastened their revenue decline by raising their annual maintenance rates, which put more pricing pressure on their customers at a time when they could least afford it. So their customers started taking a hard look at SaaS solutions as potential alternatives to traditional on-premise software.

Recession Accelerates SaaS Adoption

It wasn’t that SaaS solutions hadn’t been around for many years, it was that for many large software buyers, they hadn’t felt comfortable with software that was being managed by another companies. There were a lot of questions: Where was their data being housed, was it safe, what if they can’t handle our requirements? These were legitimate questions but many SaaS value propositions began to win over these large, skeptical customers:

  • You could try their software before you buy it
  • Get can get this software up and running quickly
  • Only buy the functionality that you need
  • If you don’t like their software, for any reason, cancel your subscription
  • The software’s performance and availability is guaranteed
  • Pay though a subscription, a big lump sum payment is not required
  • No more upgrades, this type of software is always current
  • Less or even no staff required to manage their software
  • Lower total cost of ownership

These types of on-line solutions started resonating not only with the small and medium-sized company buyer but also with the very large, global enterprises as well. Over the last couple of years we have seen well-known organizations like Siemens, Walmart, Flextronics, Thomson Reuters and even the US government adopt SaaS and Cloud-based solutions.

It’s About Innovation Not Reducing Costs

Businesses during the last recession were primarily trying to reduce costs, which resulted in large scale layoffs. These firms were trying to ‘do more with less’.  This was the reason that many of these companies continued to buy software because they not only wanted to streamline operations, but also they needed to continue to innovate their business.

By deploying the latest in software technology, these innovative companies are looking to move into new markets, provide state-of-the-art tools to their employees, and optimize their supply chains.   This required them to get smarter about their businesses, markets and competitors, and solutions like SaaS-based business intelligence products were also really in high demand.  Given the flexibility and affordability of SaaS products compared to their on-premise predecessors, it is no wonder that most SaaS companies grew at more than 30% year-over-year even during the worst part of the recession.

There are SaaS solutions for almost every enterprise need including ERP, Financials, CRM, Marketing, Human Resources, Talent Management and even specific specialized vertical solutions.  Click on this link to access Montclair Advisors Public SaaS Index to see which firms offer leading SaaS solutions.

In the next 12-18 months we may be either headed for very slow growth in the economy or even another recession, but SaaS companies will continue to grow quickly because most companies are still looking for ways to lower their total cost of operations and improve their ability to innovate and increase their overall competitiveness.  As long as SaaS providers continue to deliver on their Cloud-based value propositions, they will experience rapid growth even if the economy continues to be tight throughout 2012.

SuccessFactors – SuccessConnect 2011

Montclair Advisors did a SaaS business profile in April 2009 and recently participated in the company’s SuccessConnect 2011 in San Francisco, where we were able to hear from key members of their management team about recent news and a business update.

New Branding

SuccessFactors had changed their focus about two years to be corporate performance management focused. Darryl Dickens their new chief marketing officer announced that although Business X is still the core positioning, they wanted to reach back out to the HR buyer. Their new tag line is now more HR friendly; ‘It’s time to love work again.’ (… and by the way, I like the new branding).

With the new branding SuccessFactors wanted to re-focus their messaging around being a proven, visionary Cloud-brand for HR and business performance solutions. This new branding means there is a new logo, website, and icon system.

Part of the strategy behind the re-branding has to do with the new products and capabilities now available across the SuccessFactors product portfolio including collaboration (CubeTree), learning (Plateau and Jambok), reporting and analytics (YouCalc and Infohrm) and HRMS like Employee Central. The new brand is a laminate designed to put a logical wrapper around the suite, which can help to rationalize product bundles, pricing and packaging.

Employee Central 2.0

As customers have grown more comfortable with the Cloud, those who have older versions of PeopleSoft are now looking for alternative options for their core HR systems, and that is where Employee Central fits in. The Employee Central solution has been built for the BizX suite to integrate talent management, analytics, collaboration as well as employee services. Employee Central 2.0 was made GA in March 2011.

Most talent management providers have shied away from offering a system of HR system of record. SuccessFactors sees a real opportunity to integrate their offerings as well as a potentially large market for new Cloud-based HRIS offerings. As Workday offers not only core HR solutions but also talent management applications, both of these firms are chasing a growing replacement market in the SMB and enterprise markets.

Employee Central offers a basic system of record but stops short of a full HR and payroll system. SuccessFactors has decided to partner for payroll with Patersons, Ceridian and Meta4.

Plateau

The biggest news was that SuccessFactors purchased SaaS-based talent management provider Plateau Systems in April 2011 for $290 million in cash and stock. This was the largest acquisition to-date for SuccessFactors and marked the first time that the company had purchased a talent management application instead of an add-on technology. Plateau has a large and satisfied customer-base of both commercial and federal accounts.

Doug Dennerline, SuccessFactors new president (ex-Salesforce.com) was very clear that they were planning on getting very close to Plateau’s customers and assure them that they will allow them to do what makes the most sense for their businesses. Unlike the other learning-related acquisition, Jambok, Plateau offered an enterprise-class Learning Management System with a world-class customer-base. Plateau not only adds revenues and customers but also provides an interesting SaaS architecture and platform that SuccessFactors may be able to leverage to service their their very largest customers.

With this business combination, SuccessFactors is now one of the largest HCM SaaS providers based on total revenues, customers and numbers of users.   After all of these acquisitions, it is clear that the company now has many different growth engines moving into 2012.   Based on our briefing with the very seasoned SuccessFactors management team, it will be interesting to see how they are able to integrate all of these offerings and manage all of these potential business opportunities.

Workday Human Resource (HR) Management, Financial Management and Payroll Software On Demand

Workday 13 Update

Workday provided a preview of the latest product update, Workday 13 at the end of April.  This appeared to be a major release of functionality across their entire ERP suite including Workday HCM, Workday Payroll, Workday Initiatives (Work Management), Workday Financial Management, Workday Spend Management as well as some new user experience capabilities.

This was the first update we have received in about two years so it was really impressive to see how much progress the company has made not only with their products but also with their overall business.  Here are some key facts:

  • 200 customers and more than 130 of them are live
  • Flextronics have over 100,000 employees using their systems
  • Over 1,000,0000 employees are using their various products across their customer base
  • Targeting an IPO for the second half of 2012
  • Releasing about 3 updates per year, compared to 1 every 18+ months for their ERP competitors

Workday HCM

New capabilities include compliance functionality related to the new US healthcare regulations which will touch benefits, employee data as well as compensation.  These HCR regulatory changes also have a major impact on workforce cost so Workday is also delivering functionality related to better managing salary data for benchmarking, compensation and overall manager decision support.

As I mentioned, the last time I saw a Workday product demonstration, they didn’t very much in the way of talent management functionality but that has really changed. They now have compensation planning, performance management, succession planning and competency management.  They have wrapped these capabilities in a robust in-line analytics and decision support framework.  This framework includes pre-packaged reports and some really slick user interfaces for workforce management.  This screen shot is of their 9-box interface for their succession planning product.  What I thought was really cool is how they have integrated their position management and organization charting capabilities right into this 9-box interface for their Talent Matrix.  These capabilities look very competitive to most of the other leading SaaS TMS players in the market.

Workday's Talent Matrix n-Box

For capabilities that they don’t currently have in the their talent management products like recruitment they will continue to partner with leading specialists like StepStone (now Lumesse) who acquired MrTed and Taleo.

For learning management they have built an intelligent interface into Plateau (recently acquired by SuccessFactors).

When they demonstrated the Workday 13 product, the one thing that popped out at me was the user experience and how engaging it was.  The user interface appeared to quite flexible, allowing the user to drill down, or across to access important information, as well as the use of compelling charts, graphs and dashboards.  I thought it was interesting to see how an object oriented architecture can really impact the overall usability of your SaaS products.

Workday Payroll

For an ERP system it is very useful to provide a payroll solution to tie into.  Workday’s product has been built from the ground up to be a SaaS-based payroll solution.  Workday Payroll was launched in 2009 and supports US based payroll requirements.  The news for Workday Payroll is a new partnership with OneSource VHR for payroll co-sourcing services such as payroll settlement, tax and garnishment administration.  These are common requirements for organizations with very large workforces.

Workday 13 still offers integrations into third-party payroll providers and payroll aggregators such as Patersons and ADP.

Workday Mobility

Seems like every HR software company is now offering a mobile application for users.  The news in this area was the announcement of limited availability of Workday for the iPad.  Again, one of Workday’s strengths is user interface design and this product is no exception.  The product is not intended for heavy transactional use but more for the executive or manager that wants to easily browse through talent profiles, monitor their Chatter-like personal Workday Workfeed or gain insight into their workforce by running a report or analytics.   The general availability for Workday for iPad is planned for Workday 14.

Overall, I thought that the Workday 13 release contained some useful improvements and the product is really impressive.  Given their 3 times a year release cycle, they will continue to innovate at a brisk pace which will be difficult for the traditional ERP competitors to keep up with.  Also, their laser focus on usability will also become a huge differentiator when looking at incumbent solutions, as long as Workday can deliver the necessary functionality and security that enterprises are going to continue to demand.

Patersons Global Payroll

Montclair Advisors had done a SaaS business profile of Patersons in April 2010 and we wanted to get an update from their new CEO, Andrew Pearson. Andrew was brought into the company shortly after our profile was completed and came from SaaS collaboration provider IntraLinks where he was the Managing Director of EMEA.

With the change in management, the company has re-focused its strategy primarily around providing a robust global payroll software and services platform. This has been the company’s strength over time and they felt that this approach would open up some new ways to partner with the leading SaaS Talent Management and HCM providers if they weren’t also offering competitive products. Patersons solutions tend to be a very agile and can fit into any organization’s environment based on their infrastructure requirements. In addition, to their software platform Patersons will continue to offer customers a managed services option for their payroll processing needs.

New Partnerships

The big news was Paterson’s new partnership with Workday and how they were planning on supporting several of their larger customers who were looking for global payroll capability. Workday is focusing more on building out their financials platform in the near term and less on extending their payroll solutions, so partnering with Patersons for their Logon2 global payroll platform makes a lot of sense. The plan is to offer Workday customers not only their HCM and Talent Management solutions but also an integrated global payroll solution that allows the customer to turn off competitive payroll solutions over time. Often these types of companies may have many different payroll providers by the countries or regions that they are doing business in and by consolidating onto a single platform over time, this approach can deliver value on many different levels. This partnership was announced in January 2011.

The other big announcement that occurred after my interview with Andrew was that SuccessFactors had formed a similar partnership with Patersons’ for global payroll. Patersons will join the SuccessFactors’ partner program as a Strategic SuccessCloud Partner to provide complementary global payroll services to SuccessFactors’ multi-national customer base. The Patersons product will also be integrated into SuccessFactors’ Employee Central product, which will allow customers to streamline their payroll administration especially for multi-national operations.

Strategy

This re-focused strategy has been working with the company experiencing strong growth in excess of 40% annual growth and currently support more than 160 countries. Patersons today is concentrating on offering core ‘gross-to-net’ capabilities to 15 countries and will continue to expand their payroll platform out to up to 50 high GDP states and regions over the next few years. The only other software firm that has this level of cover is SAP but they aren’t going to SaaS anytime in the near future.

The future vision for Patersons is to offer their customers and partners a fully integrated global solution that allows large firms control over their payroll, ability to comply with governmental regulations as well as to reduce the cost of administration. For many of their target customers, who have grown through M&A, they have multiple vendors and a lot of technology, this level of complexity is driving up costs, and Patersons can help to streamline their payroll processes using both software and managed services.

The re-focusing of the Patersons’ strategy to primarily offer a SaaS-based global payroll platform appears to be gaining momentum and it appears that they are a company to watch here in the second half of 2011.

I was going to write this post earlier in the week but it seemed that everywhere I turned I saw more developments and wanted to include them.  The market is really starting to get frothy and there are many big SaaS/Cloud deals happening and companies going public with very large market caps.  Let’s take a look:

Recent Acquisitions

SuccessFactors (NASDAQ: SFSF) Acquires Plateau Systems for $290M, which was paid in half cash and half in stock.  This is an interesting move since it is the first acquisition that could be considered ‘core’ functionality when compared with other acquisitions like CubeTree (Collaboration), YouCalc (Analytics), Inform (Analytics) and Jambok (eLearning).  Plateau also has a fairly significant product portfolio overlap including compensation, performance management and succession planning, so it should be interesting to see how these offerings are consolidated.

Plateau has a very respectable customer-base with a large number of federal government customers as well as many large enterprise customers.  The company also was profitable and has some interesting Platform-as-a-Service capabilities that should be very useful for a larger SaaS portfolio.

Based on the market basket of publicly traded SaaS firms, this deal will make SuccessFactors the second largest firm in the group based on current revenues.  We estimate that at their current quarterly run-rate of $68M and Plateau’s estimated annual revenues, the combined company now is probably around $340M, which is only second to Salesforce.com.

CenturyLink (NASDAQ: CTL) Buys Savvis (NASDAQ: SVVS) for $2.5B, which is now third largest telecommunications company in the US with $18B in annual revenues.  The company had purchased Qwest earlier in the year and that deal was finalized on April 1st.   Now with the acquisition of Savvis, CenturyLink is moving into the Cloud Computing market with more than 48 data centers globally.

This is the second major deal in the Cloud Computing market of an emerging Infrastructure-as-a-Service provider, when Verizon purchased Terremark for $1.4B in January.  This should stimulate further consolidation of other providers and Rackspace may be the next target.

Salesforce.com (NASDAQ: CRM) Picks Up Radian6 for $326M for the Canadian social media monitoring company.  Radian6 helps their customers monitor ‘hundreds of millions’ of social media conversations. Salesforce believes that the acquisition will enable it to enhance all of its products, including Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, Chatter and Force.com.

Infor and Golden Gate Capital Buys Lawson Software for $2B.  Now this is technically not a SaaS or Cloud related deal but it just is another example of the pressure traditional providers are feeling from the up and coming SaaS and Cloud providers like Netsuite, Workday and even Oracle’s new Fusion offerings.

Recent SaaS IPO’s

Cornerstone OnDemand

Cornerstone OnDemand (NADSAQ: CSOD) went public on March 16th and quickly captured a market cap of $800M, even when the company lost more than $45M.  The company offers a suite of Talent Management solutions similar to what is offered by SuccessFactors and Taleo.

ServiceSource International (NASDAQ: SREV) completed their IPO on March 25th and were valued at more than $800M as well.  ServiceSource helps companies manage their revenue streams from renewals, maintenance and subscription agreements, which is especially important for SaaS firms.

Responsys (NASDAQ: MKTG) was able to launch into the public markets on April 21st and got a very respectable market value of $2.4B.  The company offers SaaS-based software and services that help retailers and eCommerce firms build and manage online campaigns.

By Kevin Dobbs

Montclair Advisors, LLC

Now that many software companies really feel that the risks associated with a second recession are firmly in the rearview mirror, it now seems like everyone is looking to grow their businesses.

I read a great post yesterday by Bruce Cleveland at InterWest Ventures about the Value of Growth for SaaS Companies, which I thought really accurately captured a challenge that many software firms face when transitioning to a SaaS model.   This is a subject that is near and dear to me given my background as a reformed marketing executive and someone who was responsible lead generation at Oracle years ago during the Tom Siebel and Marc Benioff era.   I think it was Tom Siebel when he was running Oracle’s inside sales team that told me “I want it to rain leads from the sky!” At the time I was actually shocked because he was asking me to literally drown his sales team with qualified opportunities who wanted to buy Oracle’s database products.

As I have come to learn that he knew exactly what he was talking about and his track record demonstrates that productive sales teams deliver amazing revenue growth results.  Bruce’s post highlights that a SaaS company without meaningful growth is not worth very much and probably will fetch the low-end of the valuation curve, which is still pretty good in today’s crazy market (See last week’s post about the SaaS Bubble).   So how are high flying SaaS companies like Salesforce and SuccessFactors achieving CAGR’s in excess of 30% every year?   Check out this chart I put together on some of the leading publicly traded SaaS firms (sans Salesforce because they will skew the chart):

As you can see the companies with the higher growth rates are also the ones that have high market caps (valued more highly by Wall Street).  What is really interesting is that SuccessFactors was able to grow by almost 50% for the past three years, even through one of the worst recessions in the last 100 years.  The value of growth can also been seen by a company that recently went public, Cornerstone OnDemand, they have been rewarded with a market cap that is over $800M even though the company lost more than $40M last year.  Seems crazy right?  But they have a great organic growth story along with a major channel relationship with ADP which could also signal even faster growth in the future.

If you talk to any software sales rep they often complain about their pipeline and the lack of quality leads. Reminds me of those coveted Glengarry leads  from Mitch and Murray downtown.    So at the heart of all of these companies and their rapid growth rates is that they have all developed a core competency to generate high quality leads and build pipelines quickly.

(click on picture to see clip)

Here are some tricks that I have learned along the way that will help you to build out your SaaS lead generation strategies:

  • Use a Portfolio Approach - Depending on your product, buyers, and market there may be many ways to generate interest.  Campaign elements of a typical lead generation strategy are a combination of organic and paid web traffic, email campaigns, webinars, customer programs, social media and targeted events.   Don’t put all of your investment in a single demand generation approach, but reward the tactics that generate quality leads at an affordable price.
  • Test and Test Again - With the portfolio approach you will need to continually test your messaging, packaging, value propositions, and price points.   The best-in-class SaaS firms are continually testing and refining their lead strategies.  This is important as most SaaS marketing organizations are trying to lower and optimize their Customer Acquisition Costs (CAC).
  • Automate Where Possible -  There are a lot of great Sales 2.0 tools available today that can give you a real unfair advantage in the lead generation process.  Companies like Marketo, Pardot, Eloqua, Constant Contact, NetSuite and even Salesforce offer many tools to help you automate and analyze your marketing efforts.  I would definitely recommend implementing a lead nurturing or drip marketing program to continue to work your lower quality leads, this is a great way to build your pipeline over time with little direct human intervention.
  • Track Everything - Make sure your sales operations and marketing teams are tracking and analyzing all of your lead activities and conversion rates.  You don’t need to be overly complex, but just tracking some basic things like lead scores, lead acceptance rates, leads converting to opportunities and close rates can help your organization to fuel your high growth SaaS sales engine.

With Cornerstone OnDemand’s recent IPO (NASDAQ: CSOD) and their high valuation based on a negative EBIDTA, many are starting to ask if we are headed for a second Internet or SaaS Bubble?

I do agree that some of the valuations at this point are a lot higher than a reasonable person would expect, but this is probably just pent up interest in the technology sector. It doesn’t help that Facebook and LinkedIn has seriously pumped up the valuations for Internet/Social Media firms, but today’s SaaS companies are very different from the Dot Bombs of 1999/2000.

Remember these companies?

Company

Business

Market Cap

(000’s)

Web Van

On-line Groceries

$1,200

Pets.com

On-line Pet Supplies

$ 325

VerticalNet

Marketing

$5,400

Kozmo.com

Delivery Services

Private

All of these companies were built on bad business models, too much money and expectations that were out of control. And by the way are all out of business.

But not all of the Internet companies that were formed during this period were bombs; in fact there are a number of firms that are now pillars of the technology industry including these firms:

Company

Founded

Business

Ticker

Market Cap

(000’s)

Amazon

1994

eCommerce

AMZN

$76,380

Ariba

1996

eProcurment

ARBA

$ 3,140

eBay

1995

eCommerce

EBAY

$39,370

j2 Global Comm.

1995

Communications

JCOM

$ 1,340

Priceline

1997

eCommerce

PCLN

$23,790

WebMD

1996

Health Content

WBMD

$ 3,150

It would be safe to say that each of these companies struggled during and after the Dot-Com collapse but they were able to modify their models to take advantage of the efficiencies that the Internet provided. Amazon has built a business that can effectively compete against the largest retailer in the world, Walmart, even though its sales are only 1/12th their revenues.

All of these Internet Survivors had to develop a real business model that would deliver solid margins, profits and growth. They each had to assemble experienced management teams, learn how to deliver superior customer service and build trusted brands. Not easy to do, but they did it.

Fast-forward to today and we have a whole new set of Internet and Software-as-a-Service companies that have emerged and gone public including these firms:

Company

Founded

Business

Ticker

Market Cap

(000’s)

Athena Health

1997

EMR

ATHN

$ 1,560

Blackboard

1997

Education

BBBB

$ 1,280

Concur

1993

Travel & Expense

CNQR

$ 2,960

Cornerstone OnDemand(1)

1999

Talent Mgmt

CSOD

$ 855

Constant Contact

1995

Marketing

CTCT

$ 1,000

Google

1998

Search, PaaS

GOOG

$187,000

Kenexa

1987

Talent Mgmt

KNXA

$ 622

NetSuite

1998

ERP

N

$ 1,880

RightNow

1997

CRM

RNOW

$ 1,030

Salesforce.com

1999

CRM, PaaS

CRM

$16,930

Servicesource (2)

1999

Service Mgmt

SREV

$ 774

SuccessFactors

2001

Talent Mgmt

SFSF

$ 2,990

Taleo

1996

Talent Mgmt

TLEO

$ 1,430

Ultimate Software

1990

Payroll

ULTI

$ 1,490

Vocus

1992

Marketing

VOCS

$ 478

(1) CSOD IPO: March 17, 2011
(2) SREV IPO: March 25, 2011

As you can see most of these companies were founded before the Internet Bubble burst and were forced to create real business models that could deliver profits.

At Montclair Advisors, we specialize in SaaS business advisory services and we know many of these firms quite well and they all have strong management teams, growing businesses and staying power. Unlike the Internet firms that went IPO in 1999 or 2000, most of these firms have had to build up their businesses over ten or more years and are based on some form of recurring revenues.

Major differences between the companies on this list versus the early Dot Bomb firms include:

  • Proven Over Time. As you can see most of these firms are at least ten years old and have weathered the economic changes through the last two recessions.

  • Businesses at Scale. Most of these companies are over $100M in annual revenues, which means they have been successful in selling into multiple markets and geographies.

  • Recurring Revenue Streams. Anyone who has been involved with a company that has developed a subscription business can tell you how hard it is to create a meaningful recurring revenue stream. The advantages of being a SaaS software company based on subscriptions means that revenues remain consistent so there is a high degree of transparency and visibility.

  • High Degree of Customer Satisfaction. All of these companies are dependent on satisfied customers that want to renew their annual subscription agreements and purchase more services. This is quite different than the ‘drive-by’ relationships many of the early Internet companies developed with their customers.

  • Strong Management Teams. After the Dot Com crash it became much harder to file for an IPO and manage a company in the post Sarbanes-Oxley world. These next generation of Internet companies have attracted leading management expertise that knows how to innovate and rapidly scale viable businesses.

So are the valuations of companies like Cornerstone OnDemand and Servicesource, Facebook and LinkedIn too high? Are we beginning to see a SaaS Bubble? Maybe, but all of these companies have been built for the long term and will be around long after any correction, unlike their early Internet cousins Web Van or Kozmo.com.