Smart SaaS

Ten Ways to Tame The High Cost Of SaaS Customer Acquisition

While walking through the exhibit area of Salesforce.com’s recent Dreamforce event in San Francisco, I was struck by large number of enterprise customers present and the low number of enterprise applications being marketed. I started to think about my experience earlier in the year helping my prior company successfully secure their Series B funding and why the word “enterprise” generates an immediate negative reaction with many venture capital firms when it comes to investing in SaaS providers offering enterprise solutions? When making the venture capital rounds earlier in the year to secure this additional funding, I was surprised by the polarity of views on enterprise applications for SaaS. One group of VC’s defined SaaS applications from a commercial market perspective … high transaction volume, low sales touch and low cost per transaction. To this group, SaaS and enterprise software were mutually exclusive. The other group of VC’s understood the higher costs associated with selling SaaS for complex enterprise requirements and saw the potential rewards. We successfully completed the funding with a group of VC firms in the later group. Their message to us was clear, we believe in the value of your business model but you must lower the cost of acquiring new customers.

The commoditization of SaaS is clearly happening in the small to medium size business market and for some enterprise market companies with relatively simple solution requirements. SaaS solution examples like Intuit’s Quicken Online and their new website building service are examples of the high volume, low sales touch, low customer acquisition cost business model. Some SaaS services offer free trials like Salesforce.com or open source downloads of their applications like Adaptive Planning to help move the prospective buyer cost effectively through the sales cycle. The sales “touch” of this style of selling is typically sending additional information via email, using web seminars and using telesales representatives to close the deal and complete the transaction. For prospective customers who need a straight-forward application that requires little or no professional services assistance for implementation, the cost of customer acquisition can be lowered significantly. It’s very understandable why some VCs only want to invest in the commoditization of SaaS with its high-volume and low-cost of sales. Can the lessons learned in this process of commoditization be applied to SaaS based enterprise solutions targeting companies with complex application needs or implementation requirements?

The answer is yes… and no. Certainly, the days of high touch enterprise style selling in the SaaS marketplace are not over yet but change needs to happen. Enterprise companies with sophisticated business requirements want to evaluate SaaS solutions but need a “high touch” approach to working with the software vendor. This typically involves lengthy requests for proposals, face-to-face meetings with executives, users and IT, customized demos, pilot programs and site visits to the vendor’s data center or reference accounts. I am sure that selling Salesforce.com to Dell or Successfactors to Siemens was not accomplished with just a free trial, web seminar and telesales rep. The challenge is in how to effectively start moving these more complex sales towards a lower customer acquisition cost business model. Here are ten ideas to reduce customer acquisition cost for a SaaS vendor to consider when selling into the enterprise market …

1) Develop, document and articulate a high impact solution methodology that can provide a prospective enterprise market customer with a clear roadmap on how the SaaS application integrates into their business requirements. A solution methodology typically involves documenting how real world business processes map to the SaaS solution and how the SaaS solution can be successfully implemented without the need for extensive consulting.

2) Use web marketing effectively to improve the quality, quantity and impact of information for the enterprise company buyer. Answer the prospect’s questions before they ask them using Flash based graphical displays, testimonials, videos, structured demos, FAQs and case studies. Web based training materials can be very instrumental in helping a company though the evaluation process.

3) Leverage social networking techniques and processes to allow prospective customers to tap into the collective knowledge of your customer base to help them through the purchase process. Of course, this implies that you are maintaining very high levels of customer satisfaction and you can filter information as needed. Suffice to say, there’s an inverse relationship between customer acquisition costs and customer satisfaction.

4) Use web conferencing technology as an alternative to on-site visits. The quality of web conferencing for both audio and video has improved dramatically over the past few years while dropping in cost. Using web conferencing to stage demos for more than one prospect also helps to reduce selling costs.

5) Organize group visits to data centers or training facilities. A large enterprise company that I worked for a few years ago would stage CIO conferences that included a visit to their data center so they could reduce the number of one-off site visits. This also allowed prospective buyers to meet and network with key vendor staff and existing customers.

6) Focus on cutting the cost of lead and opportunity generation. It’s all about conversion rates…. lead to qualified sales opportunity, sales opportunity-to-close. For SaaS-based applications designed for defined markets, target marketing to specific market segments can be much more effective than broad-based marketing to diverse market segments. The velocity of conversions from responses to leads or leads to opportunities has definitely slowed through the course of this recession. Improving the conversion rate from leads to opportunities by using lead scoring and lead nurturing techniques can significantly improve the ROI of marketing programs.

7) If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it. Taking a disciplined approach to using CRM, analytics and marketing automation to measure, monitor and manage sales and marketing results is key to cutting customer acquisition costs. If you don’t know what your pipeline metrics or your customer acquisition costs are, I doubt if you will be able to manage them effectively.

8) Know a duck when you see one, particularly when it comes to enterprise sales. Actively manage the sales cycle and accurately access the reality of each sales situation. Chasing enterprise deals that are not properly qualified will most likely not close and will dramatically increase your customer acquisition cost.

9) Drive your order processing costs down. Make your pricing and contractual models easy to access and understand. Complex pricing and contracts beg for long and costly negotiation cycles. Utilize SaaS focused billing solutions from companies like Dreamforce exhibitor Zuora to help simplify the process and reduce costs. One company that I spoke to at Dreamforce told me that their internal cost to process an individual order exceeded a thousand dollars.

10) Automate as much of the implementation and data integration process as possible, articulate an implementation methodology and make configuration an end user process. This is a significant challenge for SaaS based enterprise solutions because implementations are typically complex and there is a large quantity of data that most be extracted from an in-house system, transformed and loaded into the SaaS solution. Without an efficient process or tool set to simplify implementations, the cost of sales goes up because the sales cycle is extended to explain and build confidence that the prospect’s requirements can be successfully met.

Implementing any number of these ideas will help to lower customer acquisition cost. Years ago, Salesforce.com successfully competed against Siebel Systems in large enterprise accounts by following a number of the ideas mentioned above. They showed that a complex enterprise application could be sold and delivered more cost effectively using SaaS than its licensed based counterpart. Companies like Salesforce.com and Successfactors did not turn their back on enterprise sales with its implicit high customer acquisition costs but instead adapted their sales model to lower customer acquisition costs by leveraging a balanced approach to telesales and field sales, web marketing, social networking and their most important asset… satisfied and successful customers. I doubt that selling a SaaS based application to an enterprise company with complex requirements will ever become a true commodity sale but customer acquisition costs must continue to managed and reduced. As customer acquisition costs are reduced, I am confident that VC community interest in SaaS-based enterprise solutions will soon increase.

This week’s Smart SaaS blogger is Gary Damiano.
He can be reached on LinkedIn or at gedamiano@gmail.com.

View all

Tags

Comments

  1. Great post Kevin- I’m definitely going to include it in This Week in SaaS.

    Just a quick thought- in Google reader the photo credit could confuse people who actually wrote the artice IMHO….

    Hope you’re well.

    Justin

  2. Tim

    Great Article.

    Tim

  3. This is really nice article. If you think objectively most of what you are saying here applies to non-SaaS business model as well (with one or two exceptions).
    I would like to add two more items to your list

    11) Building Eco-system of partners and working with partner channel is very critical for managing costs of acquisition in SaaS business model. Consideration for building eco-system upfront has to be in place from day one of SaaS business model. Salesforce.com, Intuit.com, NetSuite.com did this very well (in my opinion)

    12) Focusing on getting multi-year deals upfront will also help in overall customer acquisition cost (indirectly) as you don’t have to go through motions of renewals every so often (in reality though, in SaaS business model you are fighting to earn/keep customers business every month, week or day depending upon terms of your contract).

    While I have worked extensively with Sales and Marketing teams, my background is in products, when I think about your commentary here, I can’t help but think about how significantly Product Architecture/Product strategy is linked with what you are saying (in SaaS business model). In SaaS business model degree of dependency between product strategy/architecture and sales/marketing models (costs) is very high. Here is what I mean by that…
    In your points above you mention that Automating Implementation or reducing cost and overheard associated with order processing… this requires that product teams design product ground up to be self service, this also requires that billing and order processing functionality be embedded in product stack.

    Offering free trials as a part of lead gen process requires that cost to serve a prospect is really low…. forcing product teams to design products which are multi-tenant and efficiently sharing hardware/software resources.

    As mentioned earlier, in SaaS business model you are fighting every day/week/month to earn and keep customers’ business. This requires that product teams listen to customer requirements and release product features for use by customers at regular intervals which are far more often(monthly to quarterly) than traditional enterprise business model (yearly). Thus, if product teams fail to deliver product features and innovation at the speed of business, your renewals are likely to suffer (and probably cost of renewals is likely go up).

    Vish Agashe
    http://www.twitter.com/VishAgashe
    http://www.linkedin.com/in/VishAgashe

  4. Hi Vish,

    Great comments. It is always a challenge to take an existing product and build a low cost CAC engine to support it, especially when it comes to trials. So I agree, having the product teams in early understanding these CAC requirements is important to building a profitable business.

    BTW Gary Damiano was this week’s blog contributor (thanks Gary)

    Kevin

  5. GaryD

    Thanks Vish and Kevin

    I totally agree with you on the importance of building an effective and efficient partner channel. From experience, this is easier said than done but if you can build a partner channel that can conduct the sales cycle independently, it can go a long way to decrease the cost of customer acquisition. Smart companies figure out how to support their partner channel as an extension of their sales team by providing marketing program participation, sales support materials and sales training on an ongoing basis.

    On your second point, I am surprised by the resistance of SaaS companies to multi-year deals particularly when it comes to enterprise solutions. The belief that multi-year SaaS deals leave “money on the table” is the result of an incomplete understanding of the cost of customer acquisition. SaaS customers are quickly learning that they can renegotiate their subscription terms when a contract is set to expire. I have watched SaaS companies spend considerable sales and management resources securing contract renewals. You can add that cost of resource to the overall cost of customer acquisition.

    regards,
    GaryD

  6. Thanks Kevin.

    Nice article and a very useful debate from all.

    I guess a key factor is the realistically addressable market, (not to be confused with Total Aspirational (sic) Market). In many cases the market is more bounded, particularly outside the US and therefore vendors need to ensure they have ways to extract appropriate (ie higher) value, and therefore need to spend time educating the customer of the value proposition and coaching them on how to sell internally.

    Nick

    (On the board of http://www.limehousesoftware.com – a SaaS based document publishing system primarily focussed on government sector; UK, USA and Australia/NZ)

  7. As a fellow webdesigner , I’m very glad to find that another individual brought up this topic.

    Many people out there just don’t grasp the concept of what all is needed in our industry, and I think also we’re many times not appreciated enough
    or taken for granted. Never the less I’m glad to see that you feel the same way I do , thanks so much for this post!

  8. Telesales is actually good for promoting your affiliate products both online and offline situations.~*`

  9. Sales training is really necessary to properly promote those products that needs to be sold in short amount of time.,;’

  10. DD

    Good read !. Thanks for posting.

    How do you think SaaS Companies should handle the crux of providing Integration services (and other related IT services) for individual cients. Should SaaS companies focus on just selling their SaaS service and say No for any other services OR accept it so as to not leave money on the table ?

    Thanks for your inputs !

  11. Hi DD,

    I think that SaaS companies should always think in terms of a whole product solution, which means solving broader questions like integration for the customer. By addressing this issue proactively, it will build a stronger bond with your customer and create a more sticky solution.

    Good solutions like Cast Iron (IBM) and Boomi (Dell) are nice SaaS-based integration solutions that can address these type of product challenges.

    Kevin

  12. Pingback: SaaS Marketers need to learn from Service Marketing

  13. Pingback: SaaS Marketers Need to Learn from Service Marketing | Leomoo.com

Leave your comment

Get connected

Email Subscribe